The Southeast Asian Times
NEWS FOR NORTHERN AUSTRALIA AND SOUTHEAST ASIA
LETTERS:



Corruption and crime persists in the Philippine government
Because perpetrators are able to get away with murder
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 16 December 2017

First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 12 December 2017

The Inquirer reported that President Duterte is set to abolish an entire commission due to corruption “Rody to fire entire commission tomorrow” 10 December 2017.
Does the President naively think that giving these government officials the easy way out - assuming they are indeed corrupt by simply firing them or asking them to resign when found to be corrupt without taking the further step of prosecuting them and meting out punishment if found guilty, will solve the problem of corruption in government?
Corruption and crimes including extrajudicial killings in government persist because the perpetrators are able to get away with murder so to speak, and with absolute impunity for example, those government officials who, in conspiracy with drug lords, allowed P6.4-billion-worth of shabu to pass through Customs.
Firing or asking them to resign will not end corruption in government.
What will deter these crimes is the certainty of investigation, prosecution and eventual conviction of their perpetrators; that is, for everyone to be made aware that an investigation will be conducted without fail, with the suspected perpetrators subsequently prosecuted and those found guilty thereafter meted out the punishment due them.
The President just recently created an Anti-Corruption Commission tasked to investigate and/or hear administrative cases primarily involving graft and corruption against all presidential appointees.
Why have we not heard from this commission yet?
Besides, does the President not know that it is the system itself which allows these government officials to abuse or misuse their public office or the power entrusted to them solely for their private interest or gain? How many morally upright men, once in power, end up becoming corrupted by the system? The system is characterized by lack of transparency and lack of people’s participation in decision-making. Just imagine corruption taking place behind a stone wall. We cannot prevent it because we do not see it. But imagine the wall to be transparent. We may not also be able to prevent it if there are no mechanisms for us, the public, to intervene and participate in decision-making.
If our President is indeed serious in crushing graft and corruption in government, he should take the lead in amending our laws and administrative procedures so that these structural causes of graft and corruption will be addressed. Sadly, all he knows are facile solutions like killing crimina ls and giving the corrupt a slap on the wrist by merely firing them, which casts doubt on his sincerity in fulfilling his campaign promise of ending crime and corruption in our country.

Severo Brillantes,
Manila,
Philippines




US decision makes the Palestinian peace process
An even more difficult task to achieve
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 15 December 2017
First published in the Star, Monday 11 December 2017

Muslim countries and American allies are shocked and dismayed that US President Trump has defied their advice and gone ahead to implement his campaign pledge to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and move the US Embassy there.
As Jerusalem is a Holy City to Muslims just as it is to Jews and Christians, Trump’s decision will have a destabilising effect on the already volatile region, making the Palestinian peace process an even more difficult task to achieve.
By his stubborn behaviour of acting to please his electoral base, he has effectively destroyed whatever confidence the Palestinians and Arab nations had on the sincerity and reliability of the US as an honest peace broker for the two state solution of creating an independent state of Palestine existing alongside the state of Israel.
Trump’s decision will reverberate across the Muslim world and raise anxiety even in South-East Asia as to whether this will give the militant Islamic extremists a propaganda tool to legitimise their random jihadist attacks on innocent citizens in retaliation for what they see as US injustice to Muslims and their Holy City.
The prospects are it will embolden the extremists and make our security situation much more difficult for the police to handle.
The majority public opinion in America is that the US recognition of Jerusalem as the Israeli state capital at this juncture is not in the best interest of their country because it will throw a spanner into the peace process, prolong Muslim anger over the Israeli occupation and make Americans more at risk abroad.
It’s clear that President Trump does not care about American public opinion too.
Having seen how Trump behaves to honour his campaign promises, and keep himself popular with the extreme right of the political landscape, we hope that Americans will now realise that their military chiefs should not trust him with the nuclear button because he may suddenly wake up one morning in an angry mood and decide to fulfil another of his wishes - destroy Iran and North Korea and show leaders in other countries who insult him what he can do to them.
Trump is clearly a menace to world peace and only the American people can teach him to change his vengeful mentality.
I hope that with the recent outburst of public outrage over the widespread occurrence of sexual harassment of women by the men who had control over their career, making the women submit to humiliation for fear of losing their jobs, Americans will realise the need to make their president accountable for the allegations that several women have made against him for touching and grabbing them in an indecent manner.
The president and his close family members are also under suspicion from the FBI investigations into their links with Russians during the last elections.
As we understand it, when it comes to Russia, all Americans from the left to the right, will put their country first, no matter what they feel about their president.
We hope that when the investigations prove that Trump has conducted himself in a disgraceful manner in his sexual advances on women and has compromised the security of his country by his secret dealings with the Russians, all Americans will rise to demand that the US Congress take the appropriate steps to censure their president and put him out to pasture.
With a new president in office, we hope that the Palestinians will then have a new chance to return to the negotiating table to work out a lasting peace with the state of Israel.
With peace in the Middle East, Malaysia too will have a stronger hand in dealing with militant Islamic extremism.

Tan Sri Mohd Sheriff Mohd Kassim,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia




Proposal for extention of Martial Law in Mindanao
Comming from the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP)
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 14 December 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 12 December 2017

It is not about President Duterte’s prerogatives.
The proposal of martial law extension in Mindanao is coming from the Armed Forces of the Philippines, Philippine National Police and local government units themselves.
They know what’s best for the country’s security situation because it is their field and they have the information on what is really going on in there.
Let us set aside politics here.
Safety of our people in Mindanao is what we are all after.
If we don’t put Mindanao under martial law, groups with evil motives will feel free and confident to plot another siege there.
They would think that what happened in Marawi could be easily staged somewhere again because the focus of the government is now elsewhere.
They should feel that they are still being carefully monitored, and what they did in Marawi will not be allowed to happen, ever again.

Lindsay Cristine Antonio,
Manila,
Philippines

 


US president Trump's action
Can have serious implications in the Middle East
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 13 December 2017
First Published in the News Straits Times, Monday 11 December 2017

United States President Donald Trump has made the most foolish decision thus far in his presidency by recognising Jerusalem (Baitulmaqdis) as the capital of Israel on Wednesday night.
Such a decision will not only create chaos in the Middle East and other parts of the world, but would also affect the battle against terrorism.
Militants and terrorists will certainly use this unilateral recognition as an excuse to cause more violence.
Trump needs to be smart when it comes to international and diplomatic relations.
It is not like running a company, which he used to do before becoming president.
A simple action by him in his capacity as the leader of a country can have serious implications for people, especially in the Middle East.
He needs to be more cautious and think deeply before taking any action, especially one as serious as this.
When its comes to the conflict between Palestine and Israel, the US president needs to be just and exercise a higher standard of professionalism to solve the protracted disagreement peacefully and satisfactorily as it involves highly sensitive issues concerning race and religion.
Trump cannot make a unilateral decision on his own without consultation with and getting the agreement of relevant parties. Recognising Jerusalem as the capital of Israel will not solve any problems. Instead, it will lead to many problems in the future, and Trump will have to bear the responsibility for all the consequences.

Dr Muzaffar Syah Mallow,
Senior Lecturer,
Faculty of Syariah and Law,
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

 


Tendering a forged medical certificate
For sick leave application is a serious misconduct
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 12 December 2017
First published in the Star, Thursday 7 December 2017

There must be complete trust and confidence between an employer and an employee.
Dishonest acts to defraud the employer - such as tendering false academic certificates to support a job application or promotion, falsification concerning work, falsification of medical certificates to support sick leave claim, telling lies to cover up work errors or for other reasons, being untruthful on the reasons for leaving previous jobs, withholding information on past criminal conviction and disciplinary action – are workplace misconduct.
Falsifying or faking certificates to support a job application is a criminal offence.
A single dishonest or deceptive act of an employee may warrant dismissal if the conduct deals with a serious enough matter.
Making false entries in the official records or certifying receipt of goods which were never received are examples of serious acts of dishonesty that would entail dismissal.
This is so because dishonesty inevitably reflects on the fitness of the employee to continue in office. Dishonesty of a less serious nature, such as submitting a falsified medical certificate to support the sick leave application, unless it is a repeated offence, may not warrant dismissal from service but would be punishable by a warning or suspension from service for a certain period.
An employee who tendered false certificates to secure a job is taking a serious risk of immediate dismissal once the fraudulent deceit is uncovered after months or even years of employment.
Likewise, a misrepresentation on qualification and skills is sufficient to warrant dismissal even if this was uncovered after a lapse of several years, irrespective of the employee’s satisfactory work performance.
Again, tendering a forged medical certificate to support the sick leave application is a serious misconduct.
In Ibrahim Bin Ab dul Hamid v Malaysia Airline Systems Bhd (MAS), the employee was dismissed from his job after the domestic inquiry panel found him guilty of tendering a forged medical certificate purportedly issued by Hospital Putrajaya.
During the trial, the employee admitted that he had bought the said medical certificate. The Industrial Court found that the company had a valid reason for terminating the employee due to his dishonest and fraudulent conduct.
Even obtaining sick leave or medical leave on false pretences of being ill and then using the leave to do other errands is workplace misconduct. This would also include making false representation to the company as to the reason for leaving the company’s premises during working hours.
The action of employees affects the implied trust and confidence as employers expect their employees to be honest and trustworthy.
In Azali Elias v Crown Jewel Hotel [2013], the claimant, who was supposed to be on sick leave, was seen participating in a football game.
The company dismissed him for abusing the company’s sick leave policy.
It must be noted that when the medical certificate was issued to the employee, it was assumed that he was sick and unfit to work and thus, would not be fit to be involved in sports activities.
In short, an employee is expected to act with complete honesty and integrity, no matter what position the employee holds in an organisation.
Once an employe
e exhibits dishonesty or a lack of integrity, the trust and confidence reposed in him by the employer can no longer subsist and it justifies the employer discharging the employee from employment as his act was detrimental to the best interest of the company.

Prof Dr Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed,
Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws,
International Islamic University Malaysia,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia

 


Look what happened in 1986
When Cory Aquino declared a revolutionary government
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 11 December 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 6 December 2017

Mendiola has been a melting pot of shared and even unshared voices.
Last week, I was there when Mula sa Masa Duterte Movement was shouting for revolutionary government.
At the same time, opposition groups shouted anti-Duterte sentiments.
To the supporters of “RevGov.”
I hope you know what you are fighting for.
It is unconstitutional and might result in the withdrawal of the international community’s diplomatic recognition of the Philippines.
In our country’s history, no constitutionally elected president has ever junked his constitutional legitimacy in order to install himself as an “extra-constitutional president.”
Look what happened in 1986.
Cory Aquino declared a revolutionary government after the military, supported by civilians on Edsa, ousted Ferdinand Marcos.
To the leftists, I hope they also know this: As far as I witnessed in Mendiola, emotions were just the basis of most militants without examining the implication of being too hardcore with their twisted belief of a Maoist-Lenin ascendancy.
Far from the noble cause of fighting what is just, a lot of them are merely bandwagoning.
They warn about absolute dictatorship, but I do not think we are going toward that political climate.
There is no such thing as an overwhelming demented belief that the only way to save our failing state is to raise its head to the summit of tyranny.

Juanito E Damaso,
Retired principal,
Manila,
Philippines



As Jesus Christ said in John 8:7:
Let the man who has no sin be the first to cast a stone
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 10 December 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 4 December 2017

Government officials from the lowest village councilor to the highest elected official of the land are public properties.
Such being the case, they are expected to work for the public’s interest - not against it.
I have watched and followed past and present goings-on in Congress, where many representatives appear like “Mr. Clean” probing or, as some quarters say, persecuting fellow officials who are either critics of President Duterte or simply in the firing range just because they were appointees of the past president.
These unlikely undertakings involving government personalities with their own record of graft charges, if not convictions, will never help refine the image of the said chamber.
For they reek of malice and political vindictiveness, hence, bereft of credibility and moral ascendancy.
As Jesus Christ said in John 8:7: “Let the man among you who has no sin be the first to cast a stone at her.”
This applies to the ongoing impeachment proceedings against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.
Who among the lawmakers can look St. Peter in the eye and claim innocence on the use of the previous Priority Development Assistance Fund or the national budget?
Keep throwing stones at others as you may, but just be very sure that your hands are clean.
Or else, your showing would simply smack of arrogance and hypocrisy.

Mark E Paras Jr.,
Manila,
Philippines




Chinese language to unseat English
Not anytime soon
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 9 December 2017
First published in the Star, Thursday 7 December 2017

On December 3, The Star published an article, “Sway of the Chinese language”, detailing the rising popularity of learning Chinese.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, US President Donald Trump’s granddaughter and billionaire investor Jim Rogers’ daughter are among some of the famous people or their family members brushing up on their Chinese language skills.
Tourists from China are splashing their cash all over the world. In some countries such as Thailand and Malaysia, the Chinese can also go cashless by making their purchases through Alipay.
Meanwhile, economists predict that the GDP of China, currently the world’s second largest, would surpass the United States’ within 10 years.
As the economic value of the Chinese language grows, it will unseat English to become the world’s leading language.
Or so we are told....
But if history is a clue, this may not happen so soon.
In the heyday of the Roman Empire, as the great Julius Caesar and his successors conquered the Mediterranean, Latin became the dominant language of the European continent.
The Roman Empire began to disintegrate in the fifth century. Latin, however, remained relevant for many centuries to come. (The Eastern Roman Empire, also known as Byzantine Empire, survived into 15th century, but its capital was in Constantinople, and its official language was Greek.)
In year 1215, the unpopular King John of England, pressured by rebel barons, issued Magna Carta.
The document established for the first time the principle that everybody, including the king, was subject to the law.
It is considered one of the first steps taken in England towards establishing parliamentary democracy.
The Magna Carta was initially written in Latin.
In year 1687, Sir Isaac Newton published three papers which were collectively known as Principia Mathematica.
These works form the foundation of classical mechanics. Principia Mathematica, like the Magna Carta, was written in Latin.
That was more than 12 centuries after the demise of the Roman Empire.
In ancient times, Malay language was the lingua franca of the Malay Archipelago. Then the Western powers came, created the modern states of Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei and Indonesia. Post-independence, Javanese, who make up 40 percent of Indonesia’s population, dominate the republic’s politics and economy. Somehow, Bahasa Indonesia is based on Malay rather than Javanese.
By 2050, China will become the world’s largest economy.
The US will drop to second place. In the third spot, as economists believe, will be India. Like Malaysia, India was a British territory.
And like our country, English, the language of the former colonial master, is still widely spoken.
By mid-century, the combined GDP of English-speaking and English-as-second-language nations, which include US, India, Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, the Philippines, Singapore and Malaysia, will likely be larger than that of China.
I do not doubt that Chinese language will get more important every year, and I encourage everyone to learn it if conditions allow. However, it would be foolish if we, in the advent of “China’s Century”, neglect English.

Chew Kheng Siong,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia




Russian embassy in the Philippines
Refutes Russian militant presence in southern Philippines
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 8 December 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 6 December 2017

Having read “Foreign fighters seen in North Cotabato” in Philippine Inquirer 19 November 2017, I was most surprised to see that the author, Edwin Fernandez, put Chechnya on the list of countries whose nationals were among foreign militants that took part in the attack on Marawi last May 23.
This statement is wrong on so many levels that an explanation is in order to prevent similar mistakes in the future.
Let us begin with the simple fact that Chechnya is not an independent country and, as such, not a subject to international law. It is a constituent unit within the Russian Federation and therefore on the international level, people from Chechnya are Russian.
Furthermore, representatives of the Department of National Defense (DND) have issued several statements confirming that no Russian citizens were present during the attack on Marawi. The Inquirer, on the other hand, has been known to specifically emphasize the presence of Chechen, which would be very difficult to determine since if the people in question were actually present in Mindanao, they would carry Russian documents identifying them as citizens of Russia.
I assure you that if DND were to determine the presence of Russian citizens among the militants, they would most definitely have approached the embassy and such facts would have been very thoroughly investigated both by the Russian and Philippine sides. For now, however, neither the DND nor any other Philippine agency has contacted us regarding the matter, which makes one question the credibility of those reports of Chechen fighters in Marawi and wonder why the Inquirer would publish such questionable information.
Please kindly refrain from publishing material that distorts the current international situation and cast a shadow on friendly relations between Russia and the Philippines.
The embassy would gladly provide advice on the current state of relations between our countries or the Russian position on any international issues.

Natalia Naumova,
Press attaché,
Embassy of the Russian Federation in the Republic of the Philippines,
Manila,
Philippines

 

 


Malaysia has the opportunity to lead the world
When it comes to the treatment of animals
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 7 December 2017
First published in the Star, Monday 27 November 2017

Malaysians consume chicken meat and eggs on a daily basis yet hardly a thought is given to the horrendous conditions in modern livestock raising systems known as ‘factory-farming’.
Malaysia is largely self sufficient in poultry meat production with over 81 percent of the local domestic demand for meat and more than 111 percent of the country’s demand for eggs met by the local poultry industry.
However few are aware of the way in which most eggs are produced by hens crammed in small wire cages, sometimes in tiers in dimly lit sheds, without access to sunlight or natural surroundings, and so denied the ability to exercise even the most basic natural instincts.
The extreme confinement denies or seriously restricts the birds’ freedom to express patterns of behaviour.
Deprivation of basic needs and behaviour such as walking, turning, exploring, interacting with or avoiding others, or being able to lie in peace and comfort endanger the physical and psychological health of animals.
Under such unnatural confinement the birds are under enormous stress resulting in feather pulling and pecking.
Beak trimming or de-beaking in poultry management is done to prevent such acts of frustration.
They are bred as egg producing machines, the aim being to obtain the optimum production from each bird regardless of its real welfare.
And what happens to hens that no longer can produce eggs after about two years in the battery cages?
They are then sent to slaughter to be turned into chicken soup and emulsified chicken products such as frankfurters and bologna and in canned products such as soups, sauces, stews and gravies. A tragic end for a hen who spends its
life producing eggs to feed the masses.
The other purpose of a chicken is to produce excessive flesh for the meat industry called broiler chickens. They are crowded by the thousands and confined along with their waste on a small piece of land. Though not confined in cages, they also experience a crowded confinement, poor air quality and stressful handling.
In addition to intense confinement, they are subjected to massive doses of antibiotics. They have the potential of exposure to various viruses and bacteria via the manure and urine in their environment.
When finally grown large enough, the birds are packed tightly into crates, stacked high on top of each other onto trucks, and transported over many miles through all weather extremes, typically without food or water, to the markets for slaughter.
Consumers are unaware about cruel practices under the veil of secrecy that has protected animal abusing industries for a long time. These industries operate outside the public spotlight because the way they treat animals would not be condoned by those concerned about animal welfare.
Malaysia has the opportunity to lead the world when it comes to treatment of animals. Yet we are behind other developed nations shows how clearly change is needed.
It is about time the Ministry of Agriculture look into a enacting a Farm Animal Act prohibiting the rearing of birds in cages, crates or other forms of intensive confinement that violates the Animal Welfare Act 2010, with acceptance of best practices and continuance for changes in regulation with animal welfare being a strong driver for increased regulation.
Change is needed, not only for animals but for farmers who need to be able to plan for the future with certainty and confidence.

S M Mohamed Idris,
President,
Sahabat Alam Malaysia.
Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia


Refute of Philippines shoot-to-kill order
Does not apply to armed rebels
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 6 December 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 4 December 2017

We would like to correct your banner story titled “Duterte shoot-to-kill order illegal - Robredo” December 1, 2017 written by Vince F. Nonato, Philip Tubeza, and Nikko Dizon.
The first paragraph of the article states: “President Duterte’s shoot-to-kill order, even if aimed at suspected armed rebels, is not in accordance with the Constitution, Vice President Leni Robredo said on Thursday.”
This misrepresents what the Vice President said as she did not refer to armed rebels, as a transcript of the said interview attests.
We underscore that terrorism is a crime against the Filipino people and must be dealt with in a wholistic manner, including use of force when necessary.
The Vice President was emphasizing that the proper process prescribed in the Constitution and our laws should be followed when force is to be used by the government.
It was not a categorical statement that all use of force is illegal.
The due process enshrined in the law for those suspected of violating it is there for a purpose: to make sure that the allegations are correct and to make sure that the penalties given are fair.
The Vice President reiterates that strong institutions like the Philippine Constitution are critical in protecting peoples’ lives and society’s wellbeing.
She calls on every Filipino to nurture, strengthen, and protect institutions to maintain peace and order in the country.

Philip Francisco U. Dy,
chief of staff,
Office of the Vice President,
Manila,
Philippines



Blinded belief in Communist Party of the Philippines
Making a fool out of all of us
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 5 December 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 1 December 2017

I find it absurd when some uninformed Filipinos find President Duterte’s
Proclamation No. 360, “Declaring the termination of peace negotiations with the National Democratic Front-Communist Party of the Philippines-New People’s Army” a disappointment while caring nothing about the attacks, extortion and other atrocities these Maoist rebels commit.
If they find the termination of peace negotiations with the NDF-CPP-NPA
horrendous, then I don’t know how they are supposed to make sense of the deaths
and destruction of properties and communities brought forth by them.
Most Filipinos don’t have any idea how hard it is to thrive in far-flung
provinces and communities like ours while facing threats of violence and attacks
made by these communist rebels.
They don’t know how painful a struggle it is not to enjoy one’s life to its fullest potential as we are compelled to periodically relocate just because some Maoist rebels and bandits are destroying and plundering barangays and other innocent lives.
But then, I can’t blame the uninformed majority for having misplaced confidence
toward the NDF-CPP-NPA and its organizational units. I find this “blinded
belief” owing to the communists’ success in making a fool out of all of us when
they conducted and disguised themselves in a manner that would make them appear
as the “champion” and “hero” of the oppressed and the poor. In previous decades,
both thriving and struggling “Juan dela Cruz” believed that they had been
fighting only for magnanimous causes such as the so-called “liberation of the
masses,” “equality,” and “progress.” Consequently, most Filipinos fail to see
the NDF-CPP-NPA’s true colors and the deceit it continuously employs in order to
justify the attainment of its selfish objectives, which obviously never
really included Filipinos’ welfare in the first place.
As someone who has witnessed the NDF-CPP-NPA’s atrocities despite decades of
peace talks spearheaded by the government, I do believe it is high time
to put an end to these communists’ existence.
The NDF-CPP-NPA is but a mere scintilla of this peace-loving and progressive
country. We should not let this amalgamate of unscrupulous criminals ruin the
aspirations of our present and future generations and hamper the peace and
development, which our far-flung communities equally deserve.

Raymundo Cuntapay,
Manila,
Philippines



Call for Filipino-only owned corporations
To extract minerals
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 3 December 2017
First Published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 1 December 2017

Many of the problems that hound the mining sector, including the recent ruckus
over the lifting of the ban on open-pit mining, can be solved by a proposed new
law: the Alternative Minerals Management Bill (AMMB).
The measure, crafted in consultation with environment NGOs, indigenous peoples,
and mining-affected communities, provides the answer to the controversies and
issues surrounding mining today.
The House of Representatives’ committee on natural resources has wrapped up the Technical Working Group discussions on the bill, and it will be up for second reading in the plenary.
The AMMB, or the proposed Philippine Minerals Resources Act, will repeal the
Mining Act of 1995 so that the people affected by mining projects can share the
power to participate in the approval of mining permits through the creation of a
multisectoral mineral management council.
The bill changes views on mineral resources, from simply profiting from their
extraction to actually benefiting from them.
The extraction should fuel the country’s industrialization through the development of manufacturing and downstream mineral industries.
Correcting one of the flawed provisions of the Mining Act, the bill will not any more allow the extraction of ore minerals for export.
Under the AMMB, only Filipino-owned corporations will be allowed to extract
mineralsa - complete opposite of the current mining law that allows large-scale
mining, mostly operated by multinational corporations.
The criteria for areas where mining is prohibited are clear.
The no-go areas include those declared no-mining zones by the local government; densely populated, especially residential areas; head waters of watershed areas; those with potential acid mine drainage; critical watershed; critical habitat; disaster-prone areas;
geo-hazard areas; key biodiversity areas; prime agricultural lands; old growth
natural or primary and secondary forests; watershed forest reserves; and
wilderness areas, among others.
The bill intends to protect small island ecosystems, such as Manicani Island in
the Leyte Gulf, from mining.
Residents of Manicani have camped outside the Department of Environment and Natural Resources offices to oppose the new application of Hinatuan Mining Corp.’s mineral production sharing agreement on Manicani, which expired last October. 27.
The communities bear the brunt of the destruction and harm caused by these
mining projects.
Aside from instituting clear-cut conditions on the mining that will be allowed, the AMMB allows allocation to local communities from the mining taxes collection.
Based on the figures of the 2016 Extractives Industry Transparency Initiative
report for fiscal year 2014, only 17 percent of total revenue payments goes to
the local government.
This amounts to P1.8 billion of the P11.1-billion total revenue collection from mining.
A provision in the proposed bill is the increase of the excise tax on minerals
from the current marginal rate of 2 percent.
It is not surprising that revenues from mining and mineral products account for a mere 2.4 percent of the country’s total excise tax collection.
The Philippines is the fifth most mineralized country in the world, yet mining
contributes only 1.1 percent of the gross domestic product, 0.4 percent of total
employment, and 0.6 percent of the government’s total revenue collection.
The landscape of the mining industry is definitely inequitable and unjust.
The harm and destruction caused by mining on the environment, the people, and the economy are not worth the supposed benefits.
I hope that my colleagues in the legislature will hear the cry of neglect and
destruction.
It is time to replace the current system while we still have time.

Rep. Teddy Baguilat,
Lone District of Ifugao,
Philippines

 


ASEAN for ASEAN's
In ASEAN lanes at ASEAN airports
The Southeasr Asian Times, Saturday 2 December 2017
First published in the Myanmar Times, Wednesday 27 November 2017

As part of ASEAN solidarity and identity, Myanmar set up ASEAN lanes for visitors arriving at Yangon International Airport’s Terminal 1 early this year.
Nay Pyi Taw wants to implement the ASEAN Charter, which stipulates that all member countries should set up an ASEAN lane to facilitate people-to-people exchanges within the group.
So far, most of its members have arranged exclusive lanes for ASEAN citizens, but Malaysia is the only country that strictly enforces it.
Any ASEAN visitor arriving at its airports must only queue up in an ASEAN lane, even though at certain times the line in it could be longer.
Likewise, non-ASEAN visitors who line up in the ASEAN lane must move to a foreign passport lane if caught.
Malaysian immigration officials are strict and outspoken. In contrast, other ASEAN members, such as Thailand and Vietnam, allow foreign visitors to get in any lane, even the one reserved for ASEAN citizens.
Thai Immigration officials never turn away queuing visitors even though the sign in their lane says “ASEAN passport holders only”.
At Yangon International, there are three ASEAN lanes, but they are not properly labelled.
The word “ASEAN” is displayed on a TV monitor in front of the immigration counter, but tourists appear to mistake it for an advertisement for ASEAN.
It is imperative to have clear signs that reserve the ASEAN lane for ASEAN visitors.
The airport authorities should inform non-ASEAN passport holders about these special lanes.
Recently at 8pm, I waited for nearly 70 minutes at passport check-in at Yangon International because foreign passengers were lined up in the ASEAN lanes (nos. 11-15). Airport officials made no attempt to tell non-ASEAN passport holders to get in the proper lane.
The ASEAN Charter states clearly that all member countries should have ASEAN lanes to increase public awareness of ASEAN identity.
This is the least that a member country can do to help realise the goals set forth in ASEAN Vision 2025.

Mayangone township,
Myanmar




Land reclaimation justified
In Singapore not Port Dickson
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 30 November 2017
First published in the Star, Friday 24 November 2017

It is shocking, indeed illogical, that the state government is prepared to pour in a large chunk of its development resources to reclaim a piece of swampy no-man’s land in Port Dickson for its proclaimed objective to “build more dwellings and create tourism products”.
The project is ill-conceived, to say the least.
Everybody knows land reclamation is a very costly business and justified only in extreme situations of land scarcity, as in the case of Singapore.
This is not the situation in Port Dickson, which has miles of pristine and beautiful beaches and large tracts of vacant land dotted only with numerous untenanted houses, apartments, condos and even bungalows and ugly skeletons of failed construction projects stretching from south of the town to the border with Melaka.
As a tourist destination, Port Dickson attracts a lot of weekend visitors but few staying tourists despite its close proximity to bigger towns and more populated cities.
What Port Dickson needs is not more land, especially reclaimed land, to construct more buildings that would eventually become white elephants, but rather investment projects to re-invent, resuscitate and re-validate the existing structures and further improve and intensify development along the coastal strip from the town to Pasir Panjang, connecting Melaka.
The state government is in a position, with the money allocated to reclamation, to do this to make PD a truly attractive vacation destination for holiday seekers from the rest of the country and overseas too.

Josen,
Subang Jaya,
Malaysia



Observance of Thanksgiving
New to the Philippines
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 30 November 2017
First Published in the Philippines Inquirer, Monday 27 November 2017

Here come the supermalls again, splurging on one-page ads in broadsheets proclaiming days of preparation and observance of “Thanksgiving.”
Since when did the Philippines have Thanksgiving Day?
I am a very senior citizen and I never saw any Thanksgiving Day celebration in the Philippines.
My parents had American teachers and they never even mentioned any Thanksgiving Day to us.
Christmas and New Year, yes, but Thanksgiving?
Never heard of it.
And that goes also for Halloween.
Both of these days are not and have never been a part of Philippine tradition and custom.
Our big malls have only one purpose in trying to impose Thanksgiving Day and Halloween on the populace: money!
These malls are just plain greedy for money that they would purposely bombard falsehoods on Filipinos.
The United States has an official Thanksgiving Day on the fourth Thursday of each November through a proclamation signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1941.
The day is not just for the often-stated history that the pilgrim colonists and the Wampanoag Indians celebrated a bountiful harvest way back in 1621 (something that many American Indians do not believe in) and for other more serious reasons for celebrating like the end of the American Civil War when President Abraham Lincoln decreed that it be kept as a celebratory day.
The other nation I know that has an official Thanksgiving Day celebration is Canada but they hold it on the second Monday of October.
India, China, Malaysia and South Korea have their own thanksgiving day for celebrating a good harvest but they also have some folklore attached to the celebrations.
What folklore or harvests are the retail companies trying to impart to Filipinos? Greed for money is no folklore.
Of course these malls will harvest tons of money!

Rocky B. Denoga,
Manila,
Philippines




Similarities between Imelda Marcos in the Philippines
And Grace Mugabe in Zimbabwe
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 29 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 27 November 2017

This is in connection with the editorial, “‘Deja vu’ in Zimbabwe” Tuesday 21 November 2017
The similarities between the events that happened in the two countries are glaring.
To cite just a few:
Both countries had been under brutal dictatorial rule by their presidents who wanted to rule for life.
The wives of both presidents wanted to succeed their husbands.
The wives were notorious for their luxurious tastes that were bankrolled by the countries’ coffers: “Imeldific” in the Philippines and “Gucci Grace” in Zimbabwe.
The enforcers of the two presidents’ iron rule were/are lawyers who served as justice and defense ministers: Juan Ponce Enrile in the Philippines and Emmerson Mnangagwa in Zimbabwe.
Their opponents have been killed, imprisoned or missing.
Plunder has transformed both countries from bread baskets to basket cases.
Both presidents were deposed in bloodless and peaceful revolutions.
But the similarities end there.
Former Zimbabwe vice president Mnangagwa, who was removed from office by deposed president Robert Mugabe over the latter’s plan to have his 57-year-old wife Grace succeed him, will become president instead.
Enrile did not succeed Marcos despite failed attempts by some of his allies in the military to unseat Cory Aquino in seven coup attempts.
Like Filipinos after the 1986 people power revolt, Zimbabweans sang and danced with joy as Mugabe’s resignation was read. Marcos fled to Hawaii but did not resign.
Though they have reasons to rejoice, there are some who expressed misgivings as to how Mnangagwa will lead his country.
His hands were bloodied by the thousands who were killed as the enforcer of Mugabe’s brutal, dictatorial and wicked 37-year rule.
John F. Kennedy’s dire warning that “one form of… control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny,” rings loud.
While there is hope for optimism, Zimbabweans have to wait and see what the future has in store for them.

Ramon Mayuga,
Manila,
Philippines




Impeachment of Chief justice Maria Lourdes
Attempt to undermine independence of Philippine judiciary
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 28 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 24 November 2017

The House of Representatives committee on justice created very dangerous precedents in ruling upon two important issues raised in impeachment proceedings on November 22 against Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.
The first issue is the committee’s denial of the right of nonmembers of the committee to participate in the impeachment proceedings, rationalizing hidden means and ends by arguing mainly that allowing nonmembers would unduly impede the facilitation and purpose of the committee system and thus defeat the speedy disposition of the case.
This position goes against the basic principles of bourgeois democracy.
It is a suppression of the inherent right of each House member to represent their constituents in very important legislative matters.
Rather than an impediment to the committee system, open participation at the level of the committee deliberations actually facilitates and ensures optimum performance by the entire legislative branch of their constitutional tasks.
It allows the committee to appreciate all points of information and various perspectives.
The second issue is the committee’s decision to refuse the Chief Justice’s counsels to represent her in the proceedings, and to conduct cross-examination of witnesses on her behalf.
This action is a complete disregard of a person’s basic right to counsel.
The right to counsel is a fundamental right accorded to every person not only at the time of trial, but during the investigation of the case at the first instance.
These brazen acts only expose not only the supermajority’s intent to railroad the process, but also to cover up what appears to be the baselessness of the impeachment complaint itself.
Founded on arguably flimsy and trivial grounds and hearsay evidence, the Sereno impeachment complaint, stripped of its pretensions, is at the end of the day, essentially nothing but an attempt by the Duterte administration to undermine the independence of the judiciary.
It also presents an ominous threat to the citizens that if this Congress could disregard and stifle the basic rights of even high ranking public officials whose independence is beneficial to all, whether elected or appointed, the rest of us is fair game in this absurd game of thrones.

Ephraim B. Cortez,
Secretary general,
Manila,
Philippines



Ease of doing business in Thailand
Easier before the coup
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 27 November 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 22 Novemeber 2017

The junta is flapping and crowing about Thailand having moved up on the World
Bank's Index, "Ease of Doing Business for 2018", from 46th to 26th, a giant leap of 20 paces. Hmm...
But it didn't tell us that before the coup we ranked 18th on the index. Here's
the rundown of the rankings, year (followed by rank): 2006 (20), 2007 (18), 2008
(15), 2009 (13), 2010 (12), 2011 (19), 2012 (17), 2013 (18), 2014 (18) -- the
coup was that year, 2015 (26), 2016 (49), 2017 (46), 2018 (26).
Note that in 2014 we ranked 18th, then came the coup by "salivating patriots"
and we dropped to 26th, then nose-dived to 46th before crawling back to 26th
place again.
To make my point clear, the junta is like a kid who was ranked 18th in the
class, then dropped to 46th, then went up to 26th and bragged about improving by
20 places. Pathetic!

Somsak Pola,
Samut Prakan,
Bangkok,
Thailand


 

 

Communist Party of the Philippines labelled as terrorists
After US president Trump's visit to Philippines
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 26 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 24 November 2017

It is worrisome to contemplate that shortly after US President Donald Trump’s meeting with President Duterte last week, several unpleasant pronouncements were announced by the latter.
Just days ago, Mr. Duterte made sudden shifts in relation to his prior statements of resuming talks with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines.
Not only did he cancel the talks, he likewise raised the conflict to a new level by openly accepting the United States’ listing and recommendation of labeling the Communist Party of the Philippines and New People’s Army as terrorist organizations.
After this, Mr. Duterte openly threatened the arrest of all progressive individuals and likewise branded legal democratic organizations as terrorist groups, using the clichéd branding that the latter are mere fronts of the CPP-NPA.
We could not but condemn US meddling in the country’s internal affairs, especially after significant achievements in the past have already been reached in relation to the process of building peace.
Equally condemnable is Mr. Duterte’s hypocrisy in calling himself a “leftist” or “socialist” president when in fact he is unleashing the full force of state fascism.
Mr. Duterte’s open claim to fascist rule is seriously worrisome.
His more than a year of populist rule is actually tainted with charges of state brutality and fascism.
Three wars have been waged since then: war on drugs, war on terror, and war on insurgents.
The number of extrajudicial killings, tortures, harassments, displacements, lootings, and other human rights violations has reached an unprecedented level that Mr. Duterte is fearlessly criticized as someone using the same draconian methods of Marcos yet even far brutal than the former dictator.
And the truth of the matter is that the most vulnerable in this open state aggression are the poor.
Hence, as church people inspired by the principles of the Second Vatican Council, and the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines, we remain as a “church of the poor.”
It is the imperative of our faith to fight state repression, to defend the poor, and build God’s kingdom on earth where justice and righteousness flow.

Regletto Aldrich Imbong,
Board secretary,
Archdiocesan Commission on Social Advocacies,
Promotion of Church People’s Response,
Manila,
Philippines

 


Thai lese majeste law
Not violated in Ajarn Sulak's case
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 25 November 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Tuesday 21 November 2017

Re: "Time to drop Sulak charges", Editorial, Bangkok Post November 15.
The two retired army generals who filed a complaint against Ajahn Sulak
Sivaraksa should realise that it is possible that they have no case against the
revered teacher - since commenting on the event that happened 400 years ago has
nothing to do with violating the lese majeste law.
Suffice it to say that Ajarn Sulak, in this particular case, is clearly a prisoner of conscience.
Release him, please.

Chavalit Wannawijitr,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 


Why did it take so long to replace
Malaysia's Environmental Quality Act of 1974
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 24 November 2017
First published in the Star, Wednesday 22 November 2017

All Malaysian patriots would surely welcome the Government’s proposed new Environmental Protection Act (EPA), which would replace the Environmental Quality Act 1974.
Indeed, it would give new hope for our environment, which has been showing dangerous and even deadly evidence of rapid deterioration.
Natural Resources and Environment Minister Datuk Seri Dr Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar and his environment-friendly team must be commended for their strenuous efforts in pushing for this new legislation against destructive pollution which has been going on for so long, so widely and so carelessly all over our country, leaving us despondent.
The new law therefore gives us all fresh hope in the future of our environment and country.
But why did it take so long to materialise?
Were vested interests or politics or sheer indifference responsible for this delay in introducing a more effective law to combat pollution much earlier?
We have to give credit to civil society for urging the Government to act more forcefully against environmental criminals.
And to be fair, the Government also deserves appreciation for finally wanting to adopt tougher laws against polluters.
Will the new law come through and actually work?
The proof of the pudding will be in the eating. Public expectations have now been considerably raised and the Government must thus deliver.
Firstly, we earnestly hope the Attorney-General’s Chambers will approve and improve the 91 sections of the EPA, which includes 41 more provisions.
Let’s hope there will be no watering down of the effectiveness of the proposed law.
Secondly, we hope the new law will be updated to meet the new norms of the United Nation’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals and the global best practices. This will ensure that our laws are up to date.
State governments have to give their full support to this new law.
If they are reluctant to do so, then the whole legislative process can be badly delayed.
If this happens, the rakyat will hope that the highly influential Council of Rulers will step in to advise the state legislatures to be more progressive to save the day and Mother Earth as well.
Under the proposed law, the National Physical Development Council together with the National Land Council will be empowered to approve or reject high-impact projects.
This move will certainly make the difference as, at present, the Department of Environment can only give advice, and these tend to be ignored.
This has led to natural disasters such as floods, landslides, river silting and coastal erosion.
The new law will remove the approving authority, power and influence of the state and local councils.
The proposed Environmental Management Tools would make it compulsory for industries and developers to self-regulate.
This is a clever move as we cannot expect environment officials to be everywhere to catch prospective polluters red-handed.
Armed with just their smartphones, members of the public and environmental organisations can provide vital assistance to the authorities to arrest polluters fast and at little or no cost.
This would be the opportunity for civil society to give concrete support to combat pollution.
Will civil society take the challenge?
I am confident it will.
We have all suffered from rising pollution and the deteriorating environment in our beloved country.
Posterity will suffer even more if we don’t tackle pollution more firmly and aggressively now.
Thus, the Federal Government’s proposed new anti-pollution law is therefore most welcome.
We hope that with even more improvements from the AG and NGOs, this new law will be passed and implemented with a strong political will.
We also sincerely hope that our society will be fully consulted and their views diligently taken into account when finalising the new environmental law.
The rakyat must be assured that there is new hope finally for our environment with the early passing in Parliament of this law and they would have more confidence and faith in the future.

Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam,
Chairman,
Asli Center for Public Policy Studies,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia

 



Call for socio-economic reforms
In the Philippines
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 23 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 21 November 2017

It wasn’t only world leaders that gathered at the recently concluded Association
of Southeast Asian Nations and East Asia summits in the Philippines, but there
were also mass movements from across the country.
Thousands of peasants,
workers, urban poor, indigenous peoples, students and professionals gathered at
the nation’s capital to assert our national sovereignty and resist the imperialist domination of our land.
Among the contingents from Southern Tagalog who joined the protests were
progressive groups under Bagong Alyansang Makabayan-Cavite, where patriots and revolutionaries like Rogelio Ordoñez and Armando Teng were born.
Braving police truncheons and water cannons, they echoed sentiments of the Filipino people clamoring for genuine change under the proimperialist Duterte administration.
Like most of our countrymen, the Caviteños suffer chronic poverty and gross
inequality while a handful of foreign capitalists prosper through the Cavite
Economic Zone.
Despite the increasing commercialization of the province, the masses remain poor and downtrodden as slum communities face constant threat of eviction and demolition.
Corruption, on the other hand, has penetrated all levels of government.
This was the case of Gardenia Valley Subdivision in Bacoor City until the residents and the local chapter of Gabriela Women’s Party ousted the notorious syndicate that had been in control of the subdivision for years, leaving the homeowners’ association deeply in debt.
No real development is possible until President Duterte shifts gear and pursues
socio-economic reforms that will benefit the broad majority, not just the few,
and lay the foundation for a just and lasting peace.
But as long as the government remains deaf to the demands of the Filipino people, we can expect more of these protest rallies - bigger and more creative than ever.
As the popular Buklod song goes: “Habang may tatsulok at sila ang nasa tuktok, ’di matatapos itong gulo.”

Daniel Aloc,
Gardenia Valley,
Molino,
Philippines



Philippine president accused of kow towing
To Chinese premier
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 22 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 20 November

I saw the picture of President Duterte bowing to Chinese Premier Li Keqiang in a
ceremony in Philippine Inquirer Thursday 16 November 2017 and was mortified.
He was bowing like a subordinate or a lowly servant to a dignified master.
All of China must be laughing at us, and especially all of Japan, and the rest of East and Southeast Asia.
The general custom, as I understand it, is for an inferior to bow to a superior
the lower his rank or social standing, the deeper his bow. The superior
responds with a slight and quick bow. There are important nuances. Equals lower
their heads to equal levels.
The Philippine president is a head of state. China’s premier isn’t.

Atis Altamirano,
Manila,
Philippines



Condemnation of use of sonic weapons
During ASEAN summit in the Philippines
The Southeast Asian TImes, Tuesday 21 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 17 November 2017

We at Agham - Advocates of Science and Technology for the People - strongly condemn the Philippine National Police’s (PNP) use of sonic weapon Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) against participants of the mobilization coinciding with the Asean Summit.
This brutal attack is a manifestation of the increasing fascism of the Duterte administration and its readiness to use dangerous methods to suppress people calling for their demands.
Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) is a sonic weapon which indiscriminately emits a loud sound way above the average human limit for hearing without damage at 85 decibels.
Its intense, high-pitched sound is proven to have health consequences, causing potential ear damage or permanent loss of hearing to activists, bystanders and members of the police force alike.
The PNP’s (PNP) indiscriminate use of such device placed all within hearing range of it in serious potential harm.
The use of Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) is patterned after “US-style fascism” to suppress the people by
whatever means.Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) was first used to disperse a protest in 2009 during the G20 Summit in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where victims sustained permanent hearing loss, tinnitus (ringing of the ears), barotrauma, ear pain and disorientation
when the Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) was activated without warning.
It is the people’s right to voice out their legitimate demands against the
anti-people agenda of the United States, China, Russia and other imperialist
countries in Asean.
For 50 years, Asean has served as a platform for these nations to keep control of their neocolonies, where the member-countries enter into multilateral and bilateral agreements on trade and security at the expense of sovereignty.
In concrete terms, Asean is one of the mechanisms that has led to the current
state of the country’s import-dependent and export-oriented economy where we
become a source of raw materials and cheap labor and a market for surplus
products.
At a time when science and technology is being used against us, we will
strengthen our collective action and raise our voices against President Duterte
and US President Donald Trump’s fascism and militarism.
We will continue to struggle for justice and genuine change, and for science that serves the interest of the people.

Dr. Giovanni Tapang,
Chair,
Advocates of Science and Technology for the People,
Manila,
Philippines





American expats say of the Philippine president
We are watching and we will desist
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 20 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 16 Nov 2017

With US President Donald Trump’s visit to the Philippines our country of residence we, as American expats, would like to make our voices heard.
We are outraged and deeply concerned with the leadership of our country.
On Trump’s watch, corruption and racism have spun out of control and we refuse to allow these things to be normalized.", "articleBody":
"With US President Donald Trump’s visit to the Philippines - our country of residence - we, as American expats, would like to make our voices heard.
We are outraged and deeply concerned with the leadership of our country.
On Trump’s watch, corruption and racism have spun out of control and we refuse to allow these things to be normalized.
Through his business dealings and properties abroad such as Trump Tower Manila, our nation’s wellbeing may be deeply compromised given his apparent reluctance to offload his interests and holdings in ways that will ensure no conflict of interest. Through his refusal to make public his income tax returns, he has kept the American public in the dark as to what his motives might be.
He has left little doubt that his policy is not made with our best interest in mind. Many of us have multiethnic families that transcend borders.
We understand very well that America is a richly diverse country and benefits profoundly from being so.
During his campaign,
Trump once referred to the Philippines as a terrorist nation and said of its people: “We’re dealing with animals.”
We stand in solidarity with our Filipino family in America and abroad.
We defy the racist and sexist rhetoric that Trump has dragged into our mainstream dialogue.
We demand that our elected officials represent ALL Americans.
Trump has sought to denigrate Special Counsel Robert Mueller in a brazen attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the investigation of possible Trump campaign collusion with the Russian government.
We call upon our representatives in Congress to protect the institutions that defend Americans from a compromised and authoritarian government.
We further call upon all our public representatives, at every level, to fight the xenophobia and tribalism that are designed to divide us along ethnic lines and to distract from increasing market capture, inequality of income, and concentration of wealth and opportunity for the benefit of the selected few whom Trump truly represents. We want Trump to know that we defy his message and his corruption by using our sacrosanct rights as voting Americans.
We are watching and we will resist.

Jeremy Slagle,
Lisa Pagkalinawan
Donald Goertzen
Manila,
Philippines

 




Philippine presidential spokesman
Accused of inability to reason properly
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 18 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, 15 November 2017

"Harry Roque’s flagrant non sequitur", "articleBody": "His appointment as presidential spokesperson appears to have affected Harry Roque’s ability to reason properly. Knowing him for his well-crafted, logical and tenable public statements, I was aghast that even before he actually took his oath of office for his new job, he already started to sound like a rabid follower of President Duterte who does not hesitate to resort to fallacy when and if he thinks this will protect and promote the administration; Let’s take his answer to accusations that Mr. Duterte is a human rights violator during an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour: “The President is a lawyer and was a public prosecutor for 10 years. I would say that it was never his intention to conduct a war on drugs that would violate the Constitution and fundamental human rights.”
This is a non sequitur.
It is just like saying that a priest could not be guilty of sexual offense because he is a priest and had been in the priesthood for 10 years.
Or that since the purpose of the police is “to serve and protect,” it is not possible
that a policeman could be involved in any crime especially if he has been a
policeman for some time already. Roque’s logic also wrongly assumes that Mr. Duterte lived by his professional oath and was exemplary in his conduct
as a prosecutor.
Where was Roque when Mr. Duterte said during a press conference on August 21, 2016, that as a prosecutor, he had planted evidence?
And even granting that that was one of the President’s outlandish jokes and that he was, after all, a model prosecutor, Roque’s statement assumed that Mr. Duterte could not have changed since then. Roque’s proof that his principal is not
a human rights violator is also like saying that a brilliant lawyer who graduated from and taught for 15 years in arguably the top law school in the land and is expected, therefore, to be a paragon of sound reasoning could never be guilty of a flagrant non sequitur such as this.

Rommel Mendoza,
Manila,
Philippines



Call for Malaysia
To establish an ombudsman
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 18 November 2017
First published in the Star, Wednesday 6 November 2017

The public congratulate Chief Secretary Tan Sri Dr Ali Hamsa for setting up a committee to monitor the implementation of programmes and projects under Budget 2018.
We would also welcome the inclusion of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission on this monitoring committee to combat corruption and leakages like the wastage of budget allocations.
But there are many questions to ask about the roles of this committee.
Will this committee only monitor the implementation of the Budget 2018 projects and programmes?
Should it not be clearly stated that this committee should be a permanent monitoring committee to oversee the implementation of all budget projects and programmes in the future?
Would this implementation committee also monitor the physical maintenance of past projects?
As we all notice, many government offices, facilities and programmes have been relatively neglected.
Maintenance in many government buildings have become inefficient, leaving some unsafe.
Will this implementation committee review and monitor the maintenance of government buildings?
Will the committee ensure that previously approved policies and programmes would also be monitored to ensure that delivery is done according to the original goals set for them?
Or have they gone off the track and are still being funded every year without too much scrutiny?
The Chief Secretary and the Civil Service will gain more support if this issue is clearly made known to the public.
While the implementation of budget projects can be monitored for effective and timely completion, what about the monitoring of the quality of service these projects provide to the public?
Can the implementation committee also monitor the quality of service and report back to the public?
The public has gradually become conditioned to accepting poor quality service in some government departments and offices.
The public often take poor government services as a given.
Unlike in the business sector, the public cannot avoid doing business with inefficient civil servants especially those who issue licences, permits, tax concessions and exemptions.
Passports are now provided so much faster (pic) but can the same be said of many other government services?
As we are aiming to become a developed country by 2020, is it not timely to establish the post of ombudsman?
The Chief Secretary’s new implementation committee could start even before the year’s end with its pioneering and laudable mission to monitor implementation.
But could the Government appoint an ombudsman and approve staff for his office to receive and independently advise the implementation committee and Parliament on all public complaints?
This move will serve the public interest in a more balanced, efficient and empathetic manner and earn much more public appreciation.
The rakyat will warmly welcome the innovative initiative by the Chief Secretary to set up this new implementation committee comprising some of the top officials in our country.
Public expectations for less corruption and expenditure wastages will now rise considerably.
We will now hope for faster and more efficient services to the public.
This desire for better quality in government services will also be raised by the realisation that the Govern­ment has been generous in providing civil servants with more rewards for their loyal service to our beloved country.

Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam,
Chairman,
Asli Center for Public Policy Studies
Kuala Lumpur




There is a concerted plan to sanitize, trivialize and ignore
The evils of Marcos and martial law in Philippine textbooks
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 17 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 15 November 2017

These are the many errors to be found in Education Secretary Leonor Briones’
response to my article “Kuri-kulam” Sunday 17 September 2017
Briones said: “While Philippine history, as a subject, is no longer part of the
junior high school curriculum, discussions of events in Philippine history,
especially on martial law, are ‘naturally integrated’ in several subjects,
among them Southeast Asian political landscape in the fourth quarter of Grade 7, and contemporary politics of Asia in Asian history (also taught in Grade 7), which focuses on the rise of dictatorship in Southeast Asia, e.g., Suharto and Sukarno of Indonesia, Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore, and Marcos of the Philippines.”

None of what Briones stated with regard to “martial law,” “Marcos” or
“dictatorships” appears in the Department of Education’s (DepEd) K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum Guide of May 2016 for Grade 7. None appears in “Asya: Pag-usbong ng Kabihasnan,” the textbook recommended by the DepEd for the use of Grade 7 students in their subject Asian History.
Briones categorized the former prime minister of Singapore Lee Kuan Yew as
belonging to a group of Southeast Asian dictators.
Mr. Lee must be turning in his grave!
I wonder what his son Lee Hsien Loong, the present prime minister of
Singapore, who was in the country for the Asean Summit, must feel, knowing that
this atrocious and slanderous idea is being taught and imprinted onto the minds
of young and impressionable Filipino learners and students by no less than the
education secretary. Lee Kuan Yew was never a dictator like Sukarno, Suharto and Marcos!
Lee Kuan Yew was the longest-serving prime minister in modern world history -
for good, obvious reasons.
He virtually raised the city-state of Singapore from scratch. His strict, no-nonsense and mildly authoritarian but clean, efficient and incorruptible style of governance led to the evolution and transformation of that small island into Southeast Asia’s most prosperous and progressive nation.
Marcos’ dictatorship, by contrast, set in motion the process of the Philippines’
degradation and devolution, which eventually led us to where we are now: at the
bottom of a cesspool out of which we cannot hope to escape.
There’s a world of difference between the two - the former created, and the latter devastated and destroyed. It is unfortunate that this piece of fake news emanated from our education secretary, who should know better than to call the great statesman a dictator like Sukarno and Marcos.
Instead, Briones should have included in her rogues’ gallery of Southeast Asian
dictators that Grim Reaper of the killing fields of Kampuchea, Pol Pot, under
whose bloody Khmer Rouge regime a quarter of the entire population of Cambodia perished.
“Pilipinas: Bansang Papaunlad,” the first book I cited in “Kuri-kulam,” is a
public school textbook, proven by the fact that it is mentioned 14 times in the
DepEd Curriculum Guide as a “learning material” for the use of Grade 6 pupils of
public elementary schools in their subject Hekasi (Geography, History, Civics).
In this book, Philippine history ended on July 4, 1946, with the Declaration of
Philippine Independence. As a result, martial law and the Marcos dictatorship
are topics that have no way of being discussed in this book. It contains many
factual errors as well.
Thus, it is a grossly defective public school textbook.
While the other nine books I mentioned were indeed published by private
publishers, the DepEd cannot escape the fact that private textbook publishers
and their authors base the content of what they write solely and entirely on the
DepEd Curriculum Guide.
They may not write based on their whim, caprice, or the windmills of their mind.
Briones’ admission that “Philippine history is no longer part of the high school
curriculum,”
plus the existence of the 10 deficient and defective textbooks I
cited in “Kuri-kulam” which are presently being used by Grade 6 pupils studying
in both public and private schools, affirm my assertion that martial law and the
Marcos dictatorship are topics that are not discussed at all in both grade
school and high school. Kulang, ’di ba? (Lacking or deficient, isn’t it?)
Therefore: “Kurri-kulang-kulang!”
There is indeed a concerted plan to sanitize, trivialize and ignore the evils of
Marcos and martial law in Philippine textbooks. Briones should look into this if
she is responsive and responsible, rather than deny it. I take umbrage at what
the secretary implied when she said: “Antonio Calipjo Go’s assertions are
nowhere near the truth.”
That is tantamount to calling me a liar.

Antonio Calipjo Gp
Manila,
Philipines




Call for Philippine president Duterte
To give the environment top priority
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 16 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 14 November 2017

Dear President Duterte and the Filipino people:
With wind speed of 315 kph, Supertyphoon “Yolanda” caused destruction in the Visayas when the global temperature was 0.8°C. At 1.5°C, the wind speed could be twice as strong - maybe 600 kph.
With such a speed, one could be in Manila from Legazpi which is 600 km away in just one hour!
Will any structure be left untoppled with a 600 kph typhoon?
God forbid!
The scientists of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States and the Met Office of the United Kingdom have predicted that in nine years’ time or year 2026, the global temperature would be reaching 1.5°C.
While almost all the governments around the world have signed up in the 2015 Paris Agreement, concrete actions have not been as fast and for most people, the response has been slow - “business as usual” - perhaps due to ignorance, selfish interests or simply inertia.
For us, Filipinos, we cannot simply wait for what would happen in the next nine years.
The Philippines is one of the most vulnerable countries due to global warming. Yolanda has etched that in our consciousness.
The earthquake in Mexico, the hurricane in Puerto Rico and many more are enough signs to urgently respond to the call of Pope Francis for “ecological conversion.”
The action of 100 million Filipinos, individually and collectively, can contribute a lot to reverse global warming. But time is precious and we have to plan now to make our country carbon negative like Bhutan.
Under your leadership, Mr. President, let us make the environment our first priority.
We should start with a 360-degree paradigm shift from our present world view that treated the environment simply as a resource to be exploited.
The indigenous people experienced the earth as a mother that gave life and in turn, they took good care of the earth and lived simply using the earth’s resources with moderation.
A symbiotic relationship indeed! Similarly, St. Francis of Assisi even called the earth sister and mother, the sun as brother, and water as sister.
Influenced by that world view of indigenous people who kept the forests intact for centuries, we should automatically embrace a simple lifestyle, too.
This would also mean controlling our appetite for unlimited consumption.
Imagine how much electricity and water can be conserved when 100 million Filipinos become ecologically conscious.
We have to aggressively promote conservation of our forests and protect biodiversity of which we are so much blessed with but, unfortunately, we are losing our native species very fast and depleting the resources that belong to future generations of Filipinos.
The government with its vast resources has to make the environment its first priority and promote conservation of forests and biodiversity in our mountains and seas.
It has to close coal plants in due time, put an end to open-pit mining immediately and invest on renewable energies.
The review of environmental laws and their strict implementation are needed while the “build, build, build” policy has to be reduced drastically to what is just necessary.
What is the use of spending billions of pesos to build structures that can be wiped out in a few hours with a supertyphoon?
The mainstream and social media, schools, churches and organizations have to be involved in creating a paradigm shift among the 100 million Filipinos so that they get involved in whatever way each one can to protect the environment.
We should create a groundswell of eco warriors to secure our one and only country.
Again, Mr. President, make the environment the first priority of your government and convince the Asean countries to do the same.

Fr. Pete Montallana,
Chair,
Save Sierra Madre Network Alliance Inc.
Manila,
Philipines




Philippine presidential spokesman
Uses threat of retaliation as tool of communication
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 15 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 13 November 2017

At a time that many Filipinos are calling out to “stop the killing, start the healing,” a positive-minded response would have been toward promotion of truth and clarity.
But the presidential spokesperson talks in terms of “throwing stones” and “throwing back hollow blocks.”
To do otherwise, however, would be out of character for this administration.
The previous spokesperson showed equanimity in dealing with the lack of clarity, lack of rational thought, and almost incomprehensible language.
Now the new spokesperson, a former law professor, uses threat of retaliation as tool of communication.
There was a time the title “professor” and even the description “former professor” - especially “UP professor” - commanded respect.
What happened?
There was also a time “human rights lawyer” conveyed a near-heroic or even near-saintly quality in a person.
Regarding this matter, I won’t ask what happened.
An example was set long ago:
A lawyer took on multiple Marcos-era human rights cases, especially those involving media persons, and immediately climbed from relative anonymity to being high profile.
Eventually, he gained very high executive power and, later, high legislative power. All the while, the media admired him.
What happens now?

Atis Altamirano,
Manila,
Philippines




Arcane book knowledge
And practical street smarts are not the same
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 14 November 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post , Thursday 9 November 2017

While we all would agree that nepotism and corruption are issues that should be
addressed in any nation's police reform efforts, Thailand's recent proposal to
have academics "supervise" and "recruit" new police cadets should probably not
get a passing grade.
As a foreign and internationally recognised research student, I feel compelled
to highlight a critical shortcoming in the plan as was reported by the Post.
It stems from the difference between theory and practice.
Academics with law degrees may seem to have all the answers on paper, but they have repeatedly shown they know little of the realities lurking outside their air-conditioned lecture halls.
I ask you, how often have these academics been in a foot chase?
Have they ever arrested anyone?
Have they ever been shot at?
Have they ever stepped outside their Mercedes Benz and even set foot in so much as one of Bangkok's slums?
The Royal Thai Police have hard lives out in the hot and smog-filled sois of
Bangkok.
The last thing that any of them need is some privileged, 24-year-old
so-called "scholar" from a hi-so university barking out theoretical solutions to
real-world problems. Arcane book knowledge and practical street smarts are not
the same.

Jason A Jellison,
Bangkok,
Thailand



Filipino students call for ban
On US president Trump visit to Philippines
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 13 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Daily Inquirer, Friday 10 November 2017

In the coming days, US President Donald Trump is expected to visit the
Philippines for the East Asia Summit.
As the youth, students, and future of this nation, we strongly oppose this visit.
US imperialism has brought nothing but wars and destruction in its neocolonies such as ours.
In the Northern Mindanao region alone, lives have been displaced in ways much
worse than ghosts and mythical tragic stories.
The US-instigated war on terror has affected and displaced over 600,000 Maranaw in the Marawi crisis.
In Agusan del Sur, Misamis Oriental and Bukidnon areas, the “lumad” were driven off, harassed, arrested, and even killed due to corporate aggressions in their land.
Even the vendors of Cogon market in Cagayan de Oro are battling the unjust and
inhumane demolition of the Road and Traffic Administration or RTA, which
prioritizes “clean and orderly roads” rather than the meager living of farmers
and urban poor.
All these socioeconomic and political problems are caused by neoliberal policies
that rule our country.
The aggravating crisis and unabated price hike of basic commodities are brought by this neoliberal globalization. Oil deregulation law, jeepney phaseout, tax reform program, privatization of basic industries like water and electricity supply, tuition and other school fee increase and K-to-12 program in education are the faces of neoliberal policies.
There is more to come with the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement or Edca, which allows the installation of US military facilities in Lumbia Airport in
Cagayan de Oro.
The presence of the US military will also open the market to prostitution like what happened in Olongapo/Subic that will endanger our women and children. Knowing that the United States is launching wars all over the world, we face grave threats of going into wars that are not even ours.
We are their victims - we are the ones deprived of our basic rights in exchange of
their profit from hospitalization to education, and other social services.
All these problems are a manifestation of how this “puppet government” conspired with its “imperialist boss” to exploit the nation and the people.
We shall not forget how our ancestors heroically fought for our land.
We shall not honor any foreign intervention much more US imperialism that preys on the poverty and hunger of the people to continue its hegemonic rule.
To let them take over our lands is a betrayal to our ancestors and heroes.
We condemn the government’s failure and neglect of its responsibility toward the
Filipino people.
We challenge the youth and students, and other progressive and concerned
individuals to stand with us.
Be one with our call to ban Trump.
Let us show the No. 1 imperialist power in the world our greatest indignation and opposition.

Kristine Cabardo,
Chair, League of Filipino Students,
Northern Mindanao Region,
Manila,
Philippines



Philippine presidential spokeman
Has the president to back him up
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 12 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 10 November 2017

I knew that when I decided to accept the position of presidential spokesperson,
I would make an easy target, given my wide girth and my background as a lawyer
who has taken up many unpopular causes.
But I did expect that whatever criticisms may come my way - especially those from
respected media institutions - I would get a fair shake.
After all, even the law on libel requires that opinions and inferences still reasonably draw from established facts.
Such however may not be said of your paper’s editorial “Damaging the Court”
8 November 2017.
First, your editorial alleges that my questioning of Ronnie Dayan during the
congressional inquiry on the proliferation of drugs in the New Bilibid Prison
was “salacious” and “sexually charged.”
My line of questioning had to do with Sen. Leila de Lima’s statement excusing
her immoral and illegal affair as a consequence of her “frailties” as a woman.
Hence my question whether Dayan took advantage of her “frailties” in having the
relationship.
Not only does it smack of sexual harassment - hiring a driver and having an affair with him two months later - but reducing such a transgression as a “frailty of a woman” is an affront to those fighting for gender equality.
That one statement of De Lima is a disservice to every woman who said she was
one with her.
It is too convenient an excuse especially for a practitioner of law who has
possibly violated Republic Act No. 6713 (Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards
for Public Officials and Employees), RA 7877 (Anti-Sexual Harassment Act of
1995), and RA 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act).
As far as my other statements were concerned, “salat” was mentioned by Dayan
thrice in describing how he handled a package of money from Kerwin Espinosa:
“Sinalat ko at mukhang pera.”
Moreover, Dayan admitted to getting De Lima to appoint certain personalities to certain positions.
That is how I got to “nagsamantala” in that he took advantage of his influence
to get what he wanted.
The official transcripts will bear me out, but these finer details got lost in the media brouhaha over the hearing.
Second, your editorial also contends that it was my “unbecoming conduct” during the said hearing that caused my supposed expulsion from Kabayan party-list.
It is a mistake.
To be clear, I was never ousted from the party.
The Kabayan “board of trustees” that supposedly expelled me - formed by Ron Salo, the party’s second nominee - is illegal as its existence is not provided for in
the party’s constitution and by-laws.
Please check with the Commission on Elections whether Kabayan’s constitution and by-laws have been amended after submission in 2009.
I have in my possession a certification issued by the Comelec on May 4, 2017,
stating that “NO amendment of the Constitution and By-Laws of [the] Kabalikat ng Mamamayan (Kabayan) Party-List… was filed and received in the Office of the Clerk of the Commission, as of this date.”
If so, it is a big wonder how Salo’s group could claim to have any legal basis
for creating a board of trustees peopled with his handpicked nominees, when
under the party’s extant constitution and by-laws, it does not exist.
In fact, the Party Congress, the highest policymaking body of the party that
approves any amendment to its constitution and by-laws, has recognized and
affirmed my own nomination as party representative.
Also, Salo was expelled as a member of the party-list as decided by the voting
delegates during the Special Party Congress of Kabayan on February. 11, 2017, over “egregious and numerous violations of Kabayan party-list’s constitution and by-laws,” including his having set up his own board of trustees without warrant from the Party Congress.
That, and his hand in the P3.8-billion car plate scam at the Land Transportation Office, where he was both corporate secretary and counsel for the winning bidder PPI-JKG Joint Venture.
The decision to expel was also arrived at unanimously by 32 out of 43 Comelec-registered voting delegates who attended the Party Congress.
But Salo’s oft-repeated lie about his board of trustees has become media’s
gospel truth, apparently.
Although I remain a committed defender of free expression, the capacity of fake
news such as his to victimize even such a venerable institution as the Inquirer
makes me wonder whether the marketplace of ideas can ever survive its onslaught
in the digital era.
I find it ironic that your editorial was published on the same day your paper ran a story on my defense of press freedom.
Third, your editorial declared that I “sought to impeach” Chief Justice Maria
Lourdes Sereno.
Had due diligence been done, it would have been found out that I never endorsed any of the two complaints filed against the Chief Justice.
It was the impeachment complaint against former Comelec chair Juan Andres Bautista that I endorsed, and nothing more.
Finally, to argue that to save the courts, the Chief Justice should step down
and avoid an impeachment is not to overstep my boundaries as a spokesperson for the President.
There is nothing in the Constitution that prohibits me from saying that.
It is a political solution to what is ostensibly a sui generis procedure that nevertheless carries with it the stark realities of the political realm.
And it is not idle speculation on my part, as I have the President’s words to
back me up, as your editorial itself noted.

H. Harry L. Roque,
Manila,
Philippines




Supreme Court orders logger to pay 16 trillion rupiah fine
For unlawful forest clearing
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 11 November 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Monday 6 November 2017

Trees are vital.
As the biggest plants on the planet, they give us oxygen, store carbon, stabilise soil and give life to wildlife.
They provide us with materials for tools and shelter. Not only are trees essential for life, but as the longest living species on earth, they give us a link between the past, present and our future.
The canopies of trees act as a physical filter, trapping dust and absorbing pollutants from the air.
They also provide shade from solar radiation and reduce noise.
Trees and shrubs have medicinal properties.
I am sure the cures for cancer and AIDS are in our jungles, waiting to be discovered.
Research has showed that within minutes of being surrounded by trees and green space, your blood pressure drops, your heart rate slows and your stress levels come down.
Trees absorb carbon dioxide as they grow and the carbon that they store in their wood slows global warming.
They reduce wind speeds and cool the air as they lose moisture and reflect heat upwards from their leaves. It’s estimated that trees can reduce the temperature in a city by up to 7°C.
Trees prevent flooding and soil erosion, absorbing rainwater.
When young, they offer habitation and food to birds, insects, lichen and fungi.
When ancient, their trunks provide the hollow cover needed by bats, wood boring beetles, owls and woodpeckers and horn-bills squirrels.
It was reported that a logging firm in Indonesia had been ordered by the country’s Supreme Court to pay a 16 trillion rupiahs (RM5.3 billion) fine for unlawful forest clearing outside its concession area, the biggest penalty for environmental damage in the country.
It’s high time our country did the same thing. We must hit illegal logging companies where it hurts the most.

Lionel Perera,
Port Dickson,
Negri Sembilan,
Malaysia



In Buddha's own words
We are what we think
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 10 November 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Monday 30 October 2017

I am highly moved by Kong Rithdee's excellent portrayal of the contradictions of Thai history and security in Opinion Bangkok Post 28 October.
Every country has its heroes and villians.
History is also about smoke and mirrors used by vested interests to keep masses inundated by exaggerations and propaganda.
People like Karl Marx dubbed religion as the opiate of the masses.
To many millions of others, religion is like a painkiller which helps them to deal with the pain and sufferings of life.
Highly ritualized practices are big constraints in developing a better understanding of Buddha teachings.
One of the distinguishing and very unique feature of Buddhism is that it emphasis the cultivation of the mind the intellect reasoning and self awareness.
In Buddha's own words, "We are what we think, all that we are arises with our thoughts, with our thoughts, we make the word.
He further said "Rule your mind or it will rule you."

Kuldeep Nagi,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 


Call for Malysia to take head
Of Moody's warnings on high debt rate
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 9 November 2017
First published in the Star, Friday 3 November 2017

Mood's Investors Service, the reputable international ratings agency, has flashed red lights about the likely emerging weaknesses in our economy.
This warning has come on the heels of Budget 2018 which was announced by the Prime Minister last Friday. Moody’s Investors Service has given us a rating of A3 with a “Stable Outlook”.
This is good except that it also highlights the following warnings.
Moody’s is not optimistic that the budget forecast of 5 percent to 5.5 percent growth will be achieved.
It thinks that 5 percent growth is more likely.
This means there will be some slowdown in economic activities, with the implications of lower incomes and higher unemployment.
Moody’s cautions that our budget revenues as a share of our gross domestic product (GDP) is among the lowest in its rating category of A3.
It highlights the fact that Budget 2018 has no new tax proposals.
We are thus depending on just natural growth of revenues, which are estimated to continue to decline to 16.6 percent in 2028 from 21.4 percent in 2012.
This is not healthy.
Should we tax the higher income groups more?
Even this lower proportion of tax to GDP may not be realised as commodity prices and global demand for our exports may not rise as much as expected.
What if prices for commodities like oil and gas and palm oil decline to lower than our projections?
On the other hand, the budget expenditures have been significantly raised in the so-called election budget, especially in the operating expenditures, while still maintaining high development expenditures.
The budget could therefore come under considerable strain.
The struggle to achieve the budget deficit target of 2.8 percent of the GDP could therefore be very challenging for Budget 2018.
This would be a red light signal for not only the health of our budget but the economy as well.
The debt which is now estimated at 51.5 percent of GDP for 2018 could rise further to finance a worsening current account deficit. Already, Moody’s is warning that this debt rate is much higher than the A-Rated median of 40.9 percent for 2017.
Is this another red light warning to tell us to be more careful lest we get downgraded from Moody’s current rating of A3? Moody’s Report on our economy is analytical and frank.
Hopefully, we will take heed of their views, taking into account our own concerns.

Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam,
Asli Center for Public Policy Studies
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia


 

No convictions 8 years after massacre
In Maguindanao Province, southern Philippines
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 8 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 2 November 2017

The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) marked International Day to End Impunity for Crimes Against Journalists on November 2, with sadness and an undimmed sense of determination to help end media killings in our country and the whole world, and bring perpetrators to justice.
While the United Nations chose this date to commemorate the assassination of two French journalists in Mali on November 2, 2013, it should never be forgotten that the worst killing of journalists in history happened in the Philippines and also in November.
The murder of 32 journalists along with 26 other civilians on November 23, 2009, in Ampatuan, Maguindanao Province, was dubbed by the Committee to Protect Journalists as the single deadliest event for journalists in the world.
The NUJP believes the Ampatuan massacre substantially contributed to the global advocacy to protect journalists and the freedom of the press.
The fact that no one has yet been convicted nearly eight years after the massacre underscores the fact that impunity reigns in this country.
Despite repeated promises to bring the perpetrators to justice, the Aquino administration utterly failed, with Andal Ampatuan Sr. escaping court judgment by dying before defense witnesses could even be presented.
Meantime, his son, Sajid Islam Ampatuan, who was Maguindanao governor at the time of the massacre, was granted bail by the Court of Appeals in January 2016, just in time for the election campaign where he ran for mayor of Shariff Aguak.
Impunity exists to this day under the Duterte administration, which is not doing any better than its predecessors.
In fact, Mr. Duterte himself justified the killings of journalists that contributed to more attacks against journalists.
Just last week, broadcaster Christopher Lozada was brazenly gunned down near his house in Bislig City, Surigao del Sur.
We note that Mr. Duterte’s Administrative Order No. 1 created the Presidential Task Force on Media Security, which is looking into media killings and harassments. The fact remains, however, that media killings and crimes against journalists are still happening, as evidenced by five media workers killed under the current administration on top of murder attempts and harassment against media workers.
It is, thus, no surprise that the Philippines ranked fifth in the world in terms of impunity in killing of journalists in the 2017 Global Impunity Index of the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).
In its report, “Getting Away with Murder: 2017 Global Impunity Index” published last Oct. 31, CPJ said “no convictions have been achieved” despite the formation of a task force on media killings.
We demand that Mr. Duterte order a stop to media killings and impunity in this country. He can start by not encouraging others to kill journalists and prosecuting those charged once and for all.

Jo Clemente,
Chair,
Dabet Panelo,
Secretary,
National Union of Journalists of the Philippines
Manila,
Philippines




The Kalikasan People of the Philippines
Don't want open-pit mining
The Southheast Asian Times, Tuesday 7 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 2 November 2017

The Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment strongly condemns the recommendation to revoke the landmark ban on open-pit mining by the Mining Industry Coordinating Council (MICC).
While President Duterte and his Cabinet still have a chance to not heed this recommendation, the unanimous decision of his handpicked henchmen Environment Secretary Roy Cimatu and Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez, cochairs of the MICC, is as good as a stamp of approval from Mr. Duterte himself.
All the bluster about holding large-scale mines accountable has just been hot air.
Let us recall that the premise of Mr. Duterte’s appointment of ex-general Cimatu to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) is his supposed military firmness in holding big mines and destructive projects accountable.
This is far from Cimatu’s actual subservience to mining oligarchs by repudiating the open-pit mining ban and other remarkable regulations instituted by his predecessor, the bold and fiery Gina Lopez.
Prohibiting open-pit mining in the context of the Mining Act of 1995 promoting the impunity of land-grabbing, plunder, and pollution should have been one of the clearest expressions of Mr. Duterte’s promise of social justice - his promise that change is coming.
We have seen numerous open-pit mines left abandoned and unrehabilitated, leaking toxics and slowly murdering surrounding ecosystems.
The argument that only pre-Mining Act open-pit mines are abandoned is belied by one of the earliest “flagship” large-scale mines under former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo’s mining revitalization program, the Rapu-Rapu polymetallic mine in Albay.
A 2015 environmental investigation mission by scientist group Agham revealed that the Rapu-Rapu mine was left unrehabilitated even after its South Korean owner, Kores, spent P158 million.
Water tests demonstrated continuing toxic acid mine drainage generation in one of the creeks downstream from the abandoned mine, registering extreme acidity with pH levels of 3.25 to 3.42, far below the DENR standards for irrigation.
Various frontline communities in the country are struggling against open-pit mine projects to avert the risk of mine disasters and to take back the lands and forests in which their villages thrived.
In Kasibu, Nueva Vizcaya, the indigenous Ifugao are protesting Australian-Canadian miner OceanaGold’s Didipio mine.
Across four provinces in Mindanao, indigenous lumad communities have succeeded in delaying the Tampakan mining project.
We call on the Filipino people to stand firm in the principle that destructive mining is not welcome in our lands, and to fight tooth and nail against the Duterte regime’s attempt to sneak the country’s mining crisis past the public’s vigilance.

Clemente Bautista,
National coordinator,
Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment,
Philippines




Two brothers shot dead by Armed Forces of the Philippines
While hunting in Barangay Cadalasan
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 6 November 2017
First published in the Philippines, Thursday 30 October 2017

My name is Violy Mendoza, I am a farmer from the municipality of Benito Soliven in Isabela.
I have seven other siblings, all of them are farmers.
Like many farmers in our place, we plant hybrid yellow corn to sell and raise chicken for food.
And just like everyone else here in our place, we are poor and hardly make both ends meet.
More so, though I am a farmer, I do not own any piece of land. I am a mere tenant and so are some of my siblings.
My two other brothers, who are the reason why I am writing to you, occasionally hunt in the nearby forest to augment their income from farming.
My elder brother Manong Ilyong or Rogelio, who is 61 years old, raised his seven children through such livelihood.
In the early morning of Aug. 28, 2017, my two beloved brothers - while on their way back from hunting - was mercilessly machine-gunned by elements of the 86th Infantry Battalion of the Armed Forces of the Philippines.
My brothers live in Barangay Baliao in the town of Benito Soliven, but the incident happened in the remote village of Sitio Lumalog of Barangay Cadalasan, which
is adjacent to our village and part of the municipality of San Mariano.
The Alpha Coy of 86th IB headed by Lieutenants Alog and Canizares are the ones responsible for the horrible untimely deaths of my brothers.
The soldiers have been in the remote farming community for already one week before their murderous action.
The soldiers, according to local residents, have taken temporary camp in a higher area very near the hut of my brothers in Sitio Lumalog.
The hut is well known to most people in the area and even to the soldiers, as a place where my brothers would rest and take shelter while hunting for wild boars in the nearby forested area.
Soldiers routinely conduct military operations in the said interior barangays of San Mariano and Benito Soliven.
Most people would rather stay away from their huts and farms when soldiers are conducting military operations because they are afraid. But because my brothers were certain that the military soldiers would leave them alone as they knew them, Manong Ilyong and Rolito went on hunting for food and something to sell later.
But my brothers were wrong.
The soldiers waited for them, carefully positioning themselves along the narrow dusty path leading to their hut. In less than a minute of bursts of gunfire, the cruel slaughter of my beloved brothers was over.
Their bodies riddled with nearly 15 bullets from the soldiers they thought would leave them alone.
One witness attested they heard Manong Roy cry out “…you are shooting civilians.” And then there was silence.
Local people living near the site of that fateful event heard the bursts of gunfire. Fearing it could be someone they know, a local barangay official waited along the path of the soldiers asking to please see the bodies the soldiers were carrying.
But the soldiers refused. Immediately there was news over the radio that there was an encounter in the interior barangay of San Mariano between the AFP and the New People’s Army, further saying that my brothers were rebel insurgents and that they were fatally wounded in the encounter.
My brothers were not fatally wounded in an encounter. They were ambushed and helplessly murdered.
It is difficult to have somebody dear to you die like they were chickens.
It is more difficult that the military and the government it serves do not seem to want to be responsible for the murderous act.
Several times already, elements of the 86th IB stationed at a nearby village in Barangay Tappa have figured in incidents violating human rights in the area.
Now fear is stronger among the people in our barrio.
It is like a virus that spreads quickly from household to household. Depriving every man, woman and child of oxygen, of free air, of dreams of freedom.
Now everyone seem to be afraid. This is not right.
It cannot be right.
So I write to your newspaper, to seek justice for my brothers.
So that people may know and they will help us and all other families like us find justice.Justice for the Mendoza brothers.
Justice for all victims of extrajudicial killings.

Violy Mendoza,
Barangay Baliao,
Benito Soliven,
Isabela,
Philippines

 

 

Rejection of claim made by Jose Rizal
That purgatory is not biblically based
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 5 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 2 November 2017

I write this to express some concerns regarding the piece by Benre J. Zenarosa, titled “Spirited away” in Philippine Inquirer Opinion, 31 October 2017.
Though a good piece and interestingly about life, death, truth, and God, I must say that I disagree with some points the writer made.
The main thing to do when the Catholic faith is attacked is to defend it. I shall do so with the limited capacity and knowledge I have.
Jose Rizal is our national hero indeed.
But the heeding of his words as a premise is weak to substantiate the claim that purgatory is not biblically based.
First, even if Rizal said that the idea of purgatory is absent in the New and Old Testaments, even if Moses or Jesus did not mention it, the Bible is not interpreted literally.
In Catholic theology, there is exegesis and eisegesis: The former is the contextual and historical analysis of the biblical text, while the latter is the interpretation of the reader (in most cases, a scholar).
Zenarosa’s argument appeared to be a sweeping generalization of what the Catholic faith teaches.
The Bible began from Catholic tradition and is preserved through deep interpretation - not as baseless as “because Jesus or Moses said so.”
Whatever happened to Paul the Apostle?
He’s in the Bible. He had mentioned something about a cleansing “fire”. See 1 Corinthians 3:15.
How about Jesus’ parables and intimations?
Jesus implicitly stated something about purgatory in Matthew 5:25-26. Second, the Bible’s interpretation - especially on matters such as purgatory - is not based only on particular lines, which is in a sense selective or myopic.
Like literature or history, doing a reading or interpretation of the Bible comes with critical analysis and inference not to forget, divine inspiration.
No wonder Saint Augustine of Hippo, Saint Thomas of Aquino, and other doctors of the Church produced tomes on Catholic doctrine and theology, including those on death and the existence of purgatory.
Therefore, they are still based on the Bible and not “invented teachings.” Perhaps Zenarosa is better than the Church fathers?
Concerning historical facts: It does not mean that because Rizal said something and is our national hero, his words are true per se. “Noli Me Tangere” and “El Filibusterismo” are historical novels.
However, everything written there ought not to be taken as historical fact.
So what does Zenarosa mean by “Are we blind to historical facts?” Substantiate please.
What Zenarosa has presented goes something like this: Rizal said it, therefore it is true. First, Rizal is human, capable of mistakes like us.
Second, he is not a theologian and is probably not in the proper disposition to determine such matters of the Catholic faith, especially that the line Zenarosa stated is written in a novel and not a personal memoir. Third, even if we had the deepest or most profound ruminations on life, God, and religion, we are limited. Saints Augustine and Thomas, the greatest thinkers in Church history, would agree. And lest we forget: The devil is capable of sowing confusion in our minds.
Zenarosa has also asked the question: “Where did the doctrine of purgatory come from?” However noble the query, he has failed to give a precise answer. He just jumped from the said question to Pope Benedict XVI’s scrapping of the doctrine of limbo, making it look like it was nothing serious. Although limbo was not a Catholic teaching in the first place, it was only brought to light during the International Theological Commission of 2007 and gave more weight to the reality of purgatory.
Purgatory is real. How so, he may ask?
God is merciful. Period. He himself said it: “With God’s grace and mercy, someday I hope to talk to my father again… with the almighty Father in heaven, in his paradise.”
“But nothing unclean shall enter [heaven] (Rev. 21:27).” We can’t really expect that when we die we are absolutely free from all stains of sin. Sometimes it is inevitable to fall short.
Thus, the existence of purgatory so that the souls may be cleansed from sins to be able to enter heaven. This reality is a manifestation of God’s great love and mercy. It is a gift from God which we ought to cherish. That is why prayers for the poor, suffering souls in purgatory are necessary. That is why we commemorate the dead (and the saints) during “Undas.”
I agree that we should really “rethink our stand and course.” For “deception is rampant” and the devil is cunning. God bless.

Jose Martin V Singh,
Manila,
Philippines

 



Call for New Zealand and Australia to be fair
In recruitment for Papua New Guinea Defence Force
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 4 November 2017
First published in the National, Monday 30 October 2017

It would be better if New Zealand and Australian defence forces would conduct recruitment for Papua New Guinea Defence Force (PNGDF) so everything is fair.
The Papua New Guinea Defence Force (PNGDF) is a small force numbering around 2500 personnel consisting of air, sea and land elements.
The recruitment team has failed and there is a lot of nepotism involved in hiring of new soldiers.
If the training depot only caters for 150 recruits, then enlist among the 22 provinces.
My appeal to the Papua New Guinea Defence Force (PNGDF) administration is to find better ways of recruitment.
It is important for our security purposes.
We must be honest in our work.

Frustrated ,
Goldie River,
Papua New Guinea


 

Call for Papua New Guinea's Labour Department
To explain their roles
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 3 November 2017
First published in the National, Monday 30 November 2017

Every now and then employees are abused, assaulted, underpaid, have their contracts breached, suffer accidents during working hours, get a pay cut, are not paid their finish entitlements, do not contribute to a superannuation fund, or are wrongfully suspended or terminated by their supervisors or employers.
They go to the Labour Department for assistance knowing that that it is a neutral Government department that knows all the policies.
It can say whether the employee/employer is right or wrong and then recommend on how best the issue can be solved.
Unfortunately, the process of waiting and follow-ups can take years.
From my observation, in the ongoing follow-up process, I see new clients coming after me and already being served.
I wonder what criteria the department follows.
Being a victim myself with my employer, I lodged my complaint in July 2016 (same time), and am still being told by them to follow up.
I am still doing the same currently. I would like someone from the elite public or the Labour Department to explain their roles and the kind of processes to handle clients’ cases.
How long it takes to work on a case?
Who should handle the case when Labour cannot do so?

FS,
Port Moresby,
Papua New Guinea



 

Proposal to turn bullet ridden Marawi City
Into a museum of ruins rejected
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 2 November 2017
First published in the Philippines Inquirer, Friday 27 October 2017

The plan for the Marawi rubble of architect Felino Palafox Jr., who was quoted as saying that “the damaged buildings can be retained, especially those full of bullet holes, as a lesson for the future on how terrorism can destroy a peaceful city” in “Cost of war,” Property, 21 October 2017 is absurd, insensitive or even inhuman.
The Maranao have been suffering long enough to be constantly reminded of a recent horrible and bitter past.
All the Maranao need right now are the government’s sincerity and mercy to help them get back to a normal and peaceful life.
The stigma of the siege is incomprehensible to the Maranao, who do not
need a city-wide museum of ruins as a “Great Reminder.” Palafox should be a Maranao to have truly felt and experienced the full physical, social, cultural and psychological brunt of the siege.
Certainly, he has rubbed salt on a cultural injury.
His flight of imagination can further fuel violent extremism and terrorism and can deter the psycho-social rehabilitation of affected people who are the true losers in this Marawi siege.
The government should rethink its decision to tap Palafox in the comprehensive rehabilitation of Marawi.

Sittie Mariam Macapoon,
Manila,
Philippines



Marawi- the only Islamic city in the Philippines
Has been stripped of its rightful owners
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 1 November 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Saturday 28 October 2017

We, the League of Filipino Students Northern Mindanao, vehemently condemn the lies of US Defense Chief James Mattis regarding Marawi.
Clearly, the statement comes from an eagle-like predator preying on its victims from afar.
Numerous human rights violations are accounted all throughout the war in Marawi and even more undeclared abuses are being perpetrated by the Armed Forces of the Philippines under the direct orders of the United States.
Mattis stated in the two-day Asean Defense Ministers’ Meeting: “Here’s an army that had to go in a fight like that, and they had not one human rights allegation against them with any credibility.”
Either he is blind and deaf to the real situation of the Maranao in Marawi or this is a deliberate act of disregard for human rights.
The report of the National Interfaith Humanitarian Mission last July 26-28 stated: “Karapatan was able to record at least three extrajudicial killings, five cases of torture and two enforced disappearances. These are heavy cases on top of massive documentations of threat, harassment, intimidation, and previously recorded destruction of properties and aerial bombardment.”
One case highlighted is the illegal arrest and detention of mechanic Lala Arafat on July 23, 2017.
Arafat was a known leader in an evacuation center in Saguiaran, Lanao del Sur.
A man approached him feigning to have his motorcycle fixed and a few minutes later, he was arrested by the police.
Days later, the media reported that he is a member of the Islamic State (IS). As of today, the location of Arafat is still unknown to his wife and family.
Another case of arrest, detention, and torture is of a 36-year-old and his two sons. They were picked up by the military inside the evacuation center and were forced to admit that they are members of IS—all while handcuffed and with candle wax dripped on them.
These are just few of the real cases and stories of human rights violations during the war in Marawi.
Mattis made pure, grave lies to cover up what really happened during the war in Marawi. Clearly, he was trying to paint a glossy picture over the atrocious reality.
They have bombed the only Islamic city in the Philippines and slaughtered our people.
All for the entry of big corporations and foreign companies eyeing to expand their business, as well as paving the way for a military reservation.
The only Islamic city left in the country is being stripped off the hands of its rightful owners - the Maranao and the people of Mindanao.
Up to this day, more or less 600,000 displaced people continually struggle to survive daily in the midst of uncertainty, lack of sufficient socioeconomic assistance from the government, ethnic discrimination, and a threat of extinction of their cultural and religious practices.
We vow to stand by the Moro people and the Maranao.
We vow to support their demand for rehabilitation and justice for the widespread death and destruction caused by the US-Duterte regime.
We call an end to martial law!

Kristine Cabardo,
Chair,
League of Filipino Students,
Northern Mindanao,
Philippines




China's financial assistance should not
Distract from dispute over West Philippine Sea

The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 31 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 30 October 2017

As Justice George Malcolm put it: “To doubt is to sustain.”
As how I see it, this could be the very essence within which President Duterte’s independent foreign policy, vis-à-vis China, operates.
Just recently, it has been reported that aside from the P65-million assistance given by China to the Armed Forces of the Philippines, it also gave additional humanitarian aid funds for the rehabilitation of Maute-Islamic State-stricken Marawi City.
Also, we cannot be remiss in accounting for all other previous financial assistance China has extended and popularly denominated as “soft loans.”
While these are good news, it is believed that these favors should not become a distraction for the Philippines’ claim over the West Philippine Sea, which was upheld by the Permanent Court of Arbitration more than a year ago.
What the Philippines can do in view of the status quo is to make the most out of the “outpouring” assistance and/or support of China.
While a warming nontraditional relation is emerging between the Philippines and China, the former should not forget to strike a balance among its neighbors and allies.
Consequently, President Duterte must always be mindful of his acts in order not to cause undue detriment or jeopardy of the Philippines’ existing relations with traditional/old allies such as the United States.
Sound foreign relations practiced by most progressive countries show and dictate that a good and independent foreign policy must be inclusive - not one that eliminates - to ensure optimum benefit of the state.
Finally, and more importantly, the Philippines must stay firm and unequivocal with its dealings with China.
In every transaction, the former should always put first the best interest of the state and prevent any act that would amount to a divestiture or cession of any of its rights to the latter.
This is because, at this point, we still don’t know and can’t validate China’s true intention toward the Philippines.
I can only hope that the current and succeeding administrations alike could concretize more unequivocal acts and relations, which are way beyond presumptions and suppositions. Indeed, what China would do as a manifestation of its acclaimed sincerity with its dealings with the Philippines is something no one but only time can tell.

Roberto Montoya,
Manila,
Philippines




Forget about regulations altogether
And let Malaysia's developers do as they please
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 30 October 2017
First published in the Star Tuesday 24 October 2017

It was reported in “DOE rejected developer’s application” in The Star, October 13 that “the developer’s application to build a residential project at the site of a massive landslide that took the lives of nine construction workers was rejected by the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry”.
It was also reported that the Chief Minister of Penang said the “Penang
Commission of Inquiry will conduct a full and independent investigation to
determine the cause of the incident”,

"It was a construction site mishap", Lim insist.
Lim “added that until the commission issues its findings, the developer will be
blacklisted and will not be allowed to continue work”.

Whatever conclusion the investigation draws, it would seem that the developer
has been operating illegally, for which the owners or directors of the company
should be held accountable.
The fact that the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry rejected the
developer’s application to build at the site means that, whatever the
commission’s findings, the developer should not be allowed to continue work.
Or am I missing something?
Hold accountable those found to be in breach of regulations. Alternatively,
forget about regulation altogether and let the developers do as they please.
Anything in between is merely a waste of time and money.

Confused,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia



 

Proposed legislation for casino in Quezon City
Is a forgone conclusion
The Southeast Asian Times, October 2107
First published in the Philipine Inquirer, Wednesday 25 October 2017

The disingenuous officials of the Quezon City government are at it again: Telling their constituents one thing and doing another.
In the October 20 Inquirer’s Metro report, the city council responded to an “open letter from concerned citizens” published on October 16, assuring QC residents that there is nothing to worry about the rumor that a humongous casino would soon rise in their midst.
Vice Mayor Joy Belmonte, the presiding officer of the city council, said two things that discombobulated and made us wonder to what extent our city officials would go to hide the truth:
“There are no formal applications yet” for any casino operation in the city; and 2) The proposed ordinance - No. 20CC-247 -“was passed on second reading on Ocobert. 2, but would still be subject to another hearing… yet to be scheduled.”
Why on earth would there be any such “formal applications” or bids already if the ordinance permitting the establishment of a casino is still in the pipeline and not yet in the “market”?
Unless, of course, casino operators already know that the proposed legislation is a forgone conclusion, Belmonte and her PR people have got to really work harder on their communication skills.
Lame excuses or explanations like that insult the intelligence of QC residents.
But then again, what do they really know?
So the proposed ordinance was passed only on “second reading” and therefore still open for discussion in a “public hearing”?
Who is city hall kidding?
Recall only the “public hearings”
held in the past which were nothing but egregious exercises in futility.
They were just motions gone through on paper to meet the laughable requirements of the law.
For instance, those who attended the “public hearings” on the proposal to increase realty taxes in Quezon City were almost one in denouncing it as too burdensome and totally unnecessary because the city was awash with cash, outflanking even Makati City, which ranked a poor second to it in terms of income generated from taxes.
But what happened?
The city council passed that obnoxious ordinance anyway and the heck with public opinion!
It even dry-gulched senior citizens on its promise to grant a 20-percent discount if the real estate is still registered in their names!
Only those born yesterday would be clueless about what really is going on. Establishing a casino like those behemoths sprouting in Pasay City’s “entertainment center” is a mega-multibillion “marketable” deal. Just think how “capital-intensive” local elections in this country’s most populous city are. Get the picture?

Stephen L. Monsanto,
Loyola Heights,
Quezon City,
Philippines




The truth is that Philippine politicians are in it
For the money and influence
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 28 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 25 October 2017

If our politics is a garden, you would see butterflies changing their colors depending on the season.
In this country, politicians seem immune to embarrassment when they change political parties.
It is baloney to hear them say they entered politics because they wanted to serve the public. The truth is, they are there for the money and influence.
At least, for many of them.
They think they can take everybody for fools.
They switch political parties as if they are only changing neckties, depending on who is the tenant in Malacañang.
The current president, Rodrigo Duterte, carries the banner of Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas ng Bayan (PDP-Laban) so many want to be in this party.
In the early years, there were two main political parties: Nacionalista Party and Liberal Party (LP).
Now with the multiparty system, many of them go to where the side of the bread is buttered.
During the many years under Ferdinand Marcos as president, the majority were in the powerful Kilusang Bagong Lipunan.
When Marcos went into exile in Hawaii and Corazon Aquino came to power, many became chameleons.
Fidel Ramos was partyless but wanted to run for president against Ramon Mitra, a close associate of Cory’s husband, former senator Benigno S. Aquino Jr. Ramos got the support of Cory; of course PDP-Laban members were furious.
Many thought Cory should have supported Mitra instead.
But just like in any drama, there was a twist.
Ramos was in need of a party so supporters founded one for him: Lakas-NUCD (National Union of Christian Democrats), a brainchild of his cabalen, Speaker Jose de Venecia. Those “furious” PDP members switched their loyalty to Ramos.
Then came Joseph “Erap” Estrada.
From the vice presidency, he was catapulted to the presidency under the Partido ng Masang Pilipino.
Many jumped ship and wanted to be identified with Erap.
Erap was ousted by Edsa II and was succeeded by Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, who stayed in Malacañang until 2010. Arroyo’s party was the Lakas Kampi (Kabalikat ng Malayang Pilipino).
More than two-thirds of those in Congress sided with Arroyo.
When Arroyo’s administration ended, Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III became president.
The outpouring of sympathy of the people was translated into votes for Cory’s son despite LP being a small party then. It only grew when Noynoy won the presidency.
Meanwhile, PDP-Laban has recently served notice that it will impose a cut-off in accepting members after many politicians—big and small—wanted to join.
The reason is obvious.
Can our country move forward with this kind of “leaders” we have in our midst?

Max L. Sangil,
Manila,
Philippines



Thailand is better off
With a military government
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 27 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Tuesday 24 October 2017

Robin Grant should not be too quick to criticise Clara Holzer's remarks, ending
with, "there are none so blind as those who will not see".
Bangkok is not burning, there are no provincial seizures.
The streets are indeed a bit safer, there is no government sponsored religious persecution, and things are getting done.
Thailand is far better off with this military government, run by, yes, generals
in key posts, than neighbouring countries. No, the present government is far
from perfect.
Interior Minister Gen Anupong Paojinda spends our money on nonsense like the
proverbial "drunken sailor on a spree".
The Red Bull scion is still enjoying life overseas, and, yes, people are tried
in military courts with no method of appeal.
Yes, some news stories in print carry the final line with, "edited to comply
with lese majeste regulations".

However, for all his faults, the prime minister is for the country as a whole,
not raking in profit for his personal financial or political gain.
If Khun Robin gives us a proverb, perhaps I should return the courtesy: Beauty
is in the eye of the beholder.
Clara Holzer, like myself, sees the good things, perhaps along with not only the
bad.

Buttercup,
Bangkok,
Thailand




Senator De Lima’s prolonged persecution and detention
Affirms travesty of justice under Philipine president Deterte
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 26 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 1 October 2017

The decision by the Supreme Court last October 10 to uphold the arrest and detention of Sen. Leila de Lima worsens the already deteriorating human rights situation in the Philippines.
De Lima has been in detention at the police headquarters in Manila for nearly eight months on politically motivated charges.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed three cases against De Lima in February
for allegedly receiving bribes from accused drug lords incarcerated at the New
Bilibid Prison, for allegedly using the money to finance her campaign for the
Senate in 2016, and for allegedly violating the country’s antidrug trafficking
law.
The cases relied entirely on spurious testimonies from drug lords inside the
penitentiary under the DOJ, which De Lima previously headed.
In exchange for charges against them being dropped, these inmates became state’s witnesses and took turns testifying against De Lima during scandalous hearings in the Senate and House of Representatives late last year, alleging that she took money from the drug trade inside the prison.
But President Duterte specifically targeted De Lima in his political vendetta
because she initiated investigations into the summary killings in Davao City
when she was then Chair of the Commission on Human Rights.
She even presented in the Senate a former member of the so-called Davao Death
Squad who testified about killings directly ordered by Mr. Duterte and his
police force.
As senator, De Lima went on to expose the extrajudicial killings related to the “war on drugs” by Mr. Duterte.
As a result, she was removed as chair of the committee and her persecution and
demonization continued up to her arrest in February.
The Supreme Court’s decision this week prolongs De Lima’s persecution and
affirms this travesty of justice under Mr. Duterte.

Fr. Amado Picardal,
Convenor,
Network Against Killings in the Philippines,
Manila,
Philippines

 


Thailand's lese majeste law designed to protect
The Chakri Dynasty from defamatory and unlawful criticisms
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 25 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 18 October 2017

The military government should reconsider the case in which two retired generals
filed lese majeste charge against Thailand's well-known academic and social
critic Sulak Sivaraksa for his comment about an elephant duel in Ayutthaya 400
years ago.
Historic events that happened such a long time ago should be open to questions
as well as reconsideration: since there are no living witnesses to verify such
events as truthful.
Furthermore, historic events that involved two countries should be accepted as
being based on facts by the living citizens of both countries - as well as
others.
Thailand's lese majeste law is widely perceived by people living in Thailand, as
well as the international community, as having been written to protect the royal
members of the Chakri Dynasty from defamatory and unlawful criticisms -
exclusive of any other dynasties in the country's ancient history.
Lastly, Arjahn Sulak is one of Thailand's most respectable elders.
Therefore, his critiques should be regarded as constructive and are meant to uplift our country's name - by way of constantly asking for the truth.

Vint Chavala,
Bangkok,
Thailand




Call for Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP)
To put their money where their mouth is
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 24 October 2017
First published in the Philippines Inquirer, Saturday 14 October 2017

Whenever I hear and read news about the fervent advocacy of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) on “human rights” and “upholding civil and political rights,” I can’t help but be reminded of the idiom “put your money where your mouth is.”
It couldn’t be more accurate on depicting how the CPP uses sugary words to deceive the Filipino people.
Being an “all talk, no action” group, I think it has no right to play human
rights champion for all of us because it, too, is a proven human rights violator.
For one, it keeps on reneging from its obligations under the Comprehensive
Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law, i.e.,
not to involve noncombatants from armed conflicts.
This notwithstanding, it keeps on plundering and sowing terror in communities, which disrupt peace, order, and progress, especially of those located in far-flung areas.
Second, and which I consider as the most despicable of all, is it involves the
innocent and promising Filipino youth in the realization of its dastardly and
criminal objectives.
In a UN report released just recently, the New People’s Army (NPA), which happens to be the armed wing of the CPP, is still among those groups that have “not put in place measures… to improve the protection of children.”
I am convinced that the CPP-NPA is a wretched entity hiding under the cloth of
apparent and pretentious righteousness and principles. Indeed, if its members
seek the realization of the basic tenets and/or principles of “justice and
equity” or “equality,” which they are allegedly fighting for decades already,
they must stop all these stupidity, drop their arms like what the Moro Islamic
Liberation Front did, and sit down to discuss what could be done with their
sentiments with the government. If they are true to their words, they must
exhibit the willingness to declare a truce and stop waging armed conflicts.
It couldn’t be agreed more that it is only when the CPP’s lip service stops that
actionable and real peace negotiation starts.
With the escalating violence and contradictions manifested by the CPP-NPA, I
don’t know where on earth our government is getting its patience and tolerance.
Praying for a lasting peace for this nation,

Juan Paolo Galgo,
Manila,
Philippines

 


Thai elites
Object to minimum wage hike

The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 22 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Thursday 12 October 2017

The statement by Labour Ministry inspector Viwat Jiraphanvanich in the October 9
report on how a minimum wage hike will hurt the economy clearly shows the
elitist disconnect within Thailand.
His defence analogy about how "high pricing" would destroy demand is a serious
distortion of reasoning.
His statement would mean then that minimum wage workers should only work "minimally" in alignment with the labour valuation, according to his logic.
The reality though is that people like him expect maximum work for minimum pay
which is a pricing structure contrary to consumerism. With consumerism, you
expect to get the "quality" you pay for.
I believe that the only way someone should be qualified to promote and develop
such social policies is through direct experience.
I challenge Mr Viwat to live for 90 days on the current minimum wage, then report and defend his position that there is no need to raise the minimum wage from real world experience, not elitist wishful thinking. Just having to get to work on the free bus every day might open his heart to the problems that institutional slavery creates.
To further state that higher minimum wages will drive away foreign investment
should be examined also.
If the only reason a company invests here is because of the exploitation of labour, then maybe their corporate model and philosophy is not needed.

Darius Hober,
Bangkok,
Thailand




Philippines failure to create jobs
Means more drug users and pushers
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday, 21 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 17 October 2017


While acknowledging the seriousness of our country’s drug problem, I maintain
with cogency that the bloody domestic war on drugs is not the only solution.
There are other viable alternatives available, in fact, more humane than killing
thousands of alleged drug users and pushers.
A paradigm shift is required away from the purported extrajudicial killings or drug-related violence, and the direction should be toward treatment and prevention.
As a suggestion, why not focus on supply and demand?
Demand creates its own supply.
This means that if there’s demand for drugs, there’s supply.
The national government’s drug policies and strategies are more motivated by
political interest and convenience rather than an understanding of the
complexity of demand and supply of drugs.
Drug kingpins probably made use of the demand and supply theory before conducting their business.
To know where the “demand” is, they have to have their demographic targets, determine who are their prospective clients, and keep a databank of their economic status, and education, among others.
The fact of the matter, in my view, is that the government is an “unwilling”
partner of drug lords in creating demand for drugs. Its failure to create job
opportunities for the unemployed may create more potential drug users and
pushers.
If people are unemployed, they will be enticed to engage in drug
business as pushers or users because the siren call of profits from the illegal
drug trade is alluring.
If the government promises treatment for drug dependents, rather than
incarceration or “death penalty,” they would be encouraged to yield and turn
over a new leaf because that would give them hope. The government should
establish drug rehabilitation centers in areas where there are drug dependents.
No amount of heavy-handed action like killing drug dependents will solve the
problem. We may as well look at alternatives as suggested. Remember, as long as
there is demand for illicit drugs, someone will provide the supply.

Reginald B. Tamayo,
Asst. City Council Secretary,
Marikina City,
Philippines



Thai minimum wage hike
Has unintended consequences
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 20 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Thursday 12 October 2017

Re: "Minimum wage hike 'will hurt economy'," in Bangkok Post 9 October 2017.
I agree with the Labour Ministry that a minimum wage hike "would hurt" the
economy.
A minimum wage hike that politicians only care about to get votes does indeed have unintended consequences - that politicians don't care about once elected.
Here's an idea that both the Thai Labour Solidarity Committee and the Labour
Ministry may like.
MMTers proponents of Modern Monetary Theory suggest that the federal government should consider starting a transitional Job Guarantee (JG) programme that, here in Thailand, would pay 712 baht a day.
The idea behind the federal government providing a job to anyone unemployed is that it acts as a wage level "floor", or "buffer", which can be adjusted like an interest rate target set by the central ban.
It prevents any unemployed person from suffering through long periods of unemployment which hurts their chances of ever getting employed again; it could pay the unemployed to continue education, or to attend training, or perhaps even getting some kind of vocational certification.
In addition to the federal government acting as "lender of last resort"
monetary policy-making and "spender of last resort" fiscal policy-making, a
JG programme would also make the federal government "employer of last resort", which complements the central bank's price stability mandate and eliminates the politics of, and the need for, a minimum wage.

Eddie Delzio,
Bangkok,
Thailand




Armchair predictions following Thai King's death
Have proved groundless
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 19 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Saturday 14 October 2017

Re: "Royal transition explains military's grip", in Bangkok Post, Opinion, October 13
Thitinan Pongsudhirak's account of the 2014 coup, produced by the then-looming
royal transition and the utter selfishness of the Yingluck administration, is
indeed first class.
All of the armchair predictions about political and social chaos in the kingdom following the late King's death have proved groundless, largely thanks to the sure hand of Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha.
While military coups inevitably have their downside - power, once tasted, is
difficult to abandon and corruption exists universally - the history books will
likely be even-handed to the current prime minister.
He has achieved what most commentators had thought impossible, namely to steer Thailand through its most difficult political era since the end of the absolute monarchy in 1932.

Barry Kenyon,
Bangkok,
Thailand




Call for the Malaysian Federal and State Governments
To review the Syariah Offences Acts and Enactments
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 18 October 2017
First published in the Star, Thursday 12 October 2017

We, the members of G25, wholeheartedly support the stance taken by the Malay
Rulers in condemning the actions of individuals and groups who, in the name of
Islam, put the harmony that exists among Malaysia’s multi-ethnic and multiracial
society at risk.
The actions by these individuals and groups reflect an ever-increasing move away
from a moderate Islam and a moderate Malaysia, contradicting the Government’s
international stance.
Indeed, these actions by the extremist few pose a very serious threat to peace, harmony and stability in our beloved nation and must be nipped in the bud right now.
Members of G25 are proud to have the Malay Rulers who stand united as leaders
against the extremism that is spreading in our country.
We are so thankful that our Rulers have not remained silent.
They have taken a crucial leadership role both in protecting the good name of Islam and to safeguard not only racial harmony but also against an existential threat to the nation.
We once again call on the Government to take a clear and firm stand against and
to urgently and decisively put a stop to the rise of religious extremism,
intolerance and bigotry not only among individuals and groups but also within
the religious enforcement agencies and the independent preachers.
We are concerned by the ambiguity of certain Syariah criminal laws and the lack
of accountability of religious institutions and authorities.
The time is opportune for the Federal and State Governments to review the Syariah Offences Acts and Enactments which give religious authorities broad powers and which are seriously lacking in clear definitions and can be abused and, indeed, have been abused.
The Federal and State governments need to urgently monitor their respective
religious departments to ensure that they do not abuse their powers and
perpetrate injustice.
Those who are guilty of abusing their powers must be held accountable.
Above all, religion comes under the purview of the Malay Rulers and this is
clearly spelt out in the Federal Constitution, and clearly the supremacy of the
Federal Constitution and the rights of the Malay Rulers must be upheld and any
previous transgressions be put right.
As religion comes under the Malay Rulers, it is also important that administrative support for the Conference of Rulers and individual Malay Rulers to be strengthened in order to restore confidence in the Syariah system of law as one which is just and not arbitrary and selective, and not be politicised.
Action also needs to be taken against those who promote hatred, mischief and
disunity. In our efforts to progress from a developing nation, it is indeed a
sad day when hate speech, bigotry and discrimination can take place with
impunity, thus encouraging offenders to influence others.
This attitude of racial and religious supremacy is not only divisive but will also have a negative impact on the social, economic and political stability of the country.
The whole nation needs to come together, from the Government to the people, to
promote unity and harmony through a renewed commitment to the principles and
spirit of the Rukunegara and the Federal Constitution in the workplace, schools,
communities and in the home.
The reputation of our country and of Islam as champions of moderation, respect and tolerance is at stake, as is the peace and unity of our people.
The diversity of our nation is our strength and our bond.
We urge all Malaysians who want to live in a nation where our differences are celebrated to join us in our call for a more tolerant, respectful and inclusive society. Let not our voices of moderation be drowned by those of the few.
The Rulers have spoken. Let us as citizens give our wholehearted support in
words and action.

G25 Malaysia,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia




Gun control in Thailand
Will not prevent crime
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 17 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Saturday 14 October 2017

The planned arms control measure which targets foreigners will not help prevent
gun crime in Thailand.
A number of Thais possess various types of guns without a licence and so many of them are from illegal origin.
The authorities should keep . a close watch on local people, not foreigners.

R H. Suga,
Bangkok,
Thailand




The Philippines is a state party to the International Convention
For the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday h16 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Saturday 14 October 2017

Please allow me to give my two cents’ worth on the matter of countering
terrorism in the Philippines.
I believe that addressing terrorism, including other acts involving violent
extremism and rebellion, is not just a matter of military operations and
prosecution of perpetrators under the Human Security Act of 2007.
It is also about looking into financing as a vital aspect of a good case management
framework.
While amendments to broaden the coverage and application of the Human Security
Act, as well as the institutionalization of a national ID system and SIM card
registration, are promising measures to counter terrorism, the defense sector
and the military should also consider cooperative or interagency measures to
implement our existing antiterrorism financing laws.
A major blow that could incapacitate, if not eradicate, any terrorist group is
to cut off its life support, i.e., resources or funds that sustain its unlawful
operations.
This would surely deprive the very means for which these entities are able to organize massive recruitments and purchase top-caliber weapons that
enable them to put up resistance against our military troops.
The Philippines has long recognized this fact, as manifested by its being a state party to the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and a participant to other related UN programs and initiatives. Consequently, in keeping with its undertakings therein, the Philippines enacted the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001 and the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act of 2012.
Among the unlawful activities covered and addressed under the Anti-Money
Laundering Act of 2001, as amended, are: 1) terrorism and conspiracy to commit
terrorism as defined and penalized under Sections 3 and 4 of the Human Security
Act of 2007; and 2) financing of terrorism under Section 4 and offenses
punishable under Sections 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Terrorism Financing Prevention
and Suppression Act of 2012.
On the other hand, the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act of
2012 has a provision on punishing “financing terrorism,” which pertains to the
possession, provision, collection or utilization of property or funds, or making
available property, funds, financial service or other related services, by any
person to carry out or facilitate the commission of any terrorist act by a
terrorist organization, association, group, or individual.
It is submitted that by looking into these laws and reconciling them with
existing legal processes and measures, our defense sector could come up with a
more holistic and encompassing approach to terrorism resolution.
It could also pave the way for new partnerships and increased cooperation among banking and financial institutions, community stakeholders, and other civil society
organizations.
In the face of current atrocities brought forth by existing and emerging
terrorist groups, such as the Islamic State-inspired Maute group, Bangsamoro
Islamic Freedom Fighters, Abu Sayyaf, and New People’s Army, it wouldn’t hurt
for our government to look at the flipside.

Adelaida Cabaddu,
Manila,
Philippines



 

Malaysia shows commitment towards
A nuclear-weapon-free zone in Southeast Asia
The Southeast Asian TImes, Sunday 15 October 2017
First published in the Star, Tuesday 10 October 2017

Citizens International congratulates the Malaysian Government on becoming a
signatory of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons at the United
Nations in late September.
The passing of this treaty should be lauded as a solid step towards the complete
elimination of nuclear weapons.
Thus, we implore the Malaysian Government to ratify this treaty in working towards maintaining world peace without the threat of nuclear annihilation.
As party to the Treaty of Bangkok, Malaysia has shown its commitment towards
maintaining a nuclear-weapon-free zone in South-East Asia.
We invite the Malaysian Government to raise this matter of profound concern to other Asean members, and to support and encourage the signing and ratification of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.
Nuclear weapons are the most destructive and inhumane weapons ever developed,
posing a legitimate threat to the environment and human survival.
The process of developing nuclear weapons alone emanates high risk of catastrophes including contamination of food and water sources, deformation in foetuses, fatal diseases, famine and climate disruption, all of which will drastically worsen in the event of detonation.
Although deterrence is often used as a pretext for acquiring and developing
nuclear weapons, our society is not capable of addressing the humanitarian
crisis and providing adequate relief to victims in the aftermath of nuclear
disaster.
Hence, it is imperative that the international community prioritises human interest and cooperates to completely eliminate all forms of nuclear weapons to safeguard public resources, maintain positive socio-economic development and protect the health of future generations.
We encourage people to support the ratification of this treaty to ensure
peaceful coexistence on this increasingly interconnected planet.
We must allow the devastating consequences of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the Chernobyl explosion to inform our attitude towards nuclear weapons as those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.

S. M. Mohamed Idris,
Chairman,
Citizens International
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia




Call for Filipinos too purchase
Locally manufactured steel
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 14 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 12 October 2017

We thank Advocates of Science and Technology for the People (AGHAM) for taking up the cudgels for the local steel manufacturers in our fight against substandard imported steel, Support local steel industry,” Philippine Inquirer 20 September 2017.
Indeed, the quality of imported steel is a major concern for the government because substandard ones jeopardize the safety of the public.
As the government carries out its mandate to ensure the quality and safety of imported materials, rebar included, we would like to share relevant information to help the buying public be more aware of standards related to quality rebar.
Unlike imported rebar, locally manufactured ones undergo stringent testing to ensure that their quality adhere to the Philippine National Standards (PNS) set for a seismic region such as the Philippines.
The first sign of quality is the logo stamped on each rebar.
The website of the Bureau of Product Standards (BPS) carries a list of approved logos—meaning, these manufacturers have been green-lighted by BPS to sell rebar.
Hardware stores and other resellers would also have posters of these logos displayed in their areas.
Other telling signs of quality are not readily visible to the naked eye and the consumer would have to physically examine the rebar.
First, there is the issue of underweight or undersized rebar.
There are imported rebar that are sold as a size or grade higher than their actual specification.
When buying rebar, the customer may ask the supplier eg. the hardware store to weigh the rebar and check the figures against the tags.
Quality rebar are also not easily bent with just one’s bare hands.
PNS dictates that rebar pass mechanical and chemical tests that assure consumers that the rebar will withstand a certain level of stress eg. tremors during earthquakes.
While the consumer ought to consider locally manufactured rebar over its imported counterpart owing to safety and quality issues, the choice between these two is also a matter of national importance.
Locally manufactured rebar equals more jobs for our countrymen.
SteelAsia alone has around 3,000 direct hires and 15,000 more are employed in support industries.
Filipino investors who pour money into local production facilities also contribute to the development of the country’s very own industrial sector.
Indeed, locally manufactured steel produced through the most modern technology and passing the highest standards of quality is the Filipino consumer’s best
choice.

MA. Teresal, Pacis,
AVP,
Corporate communication,
SteelAsia,
Manila,
Philippines

 


Conference of Malay Rulers
Call for moderation
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 13 October 2017
First published in the Star, Thursday 12 October 2017

I refer to the report “Unity first, say Rulers” in The Star, October 11.
In view of the recent cases of bigotry and extremism, it is an absolute relief that our
beloved Rulers have come out to state clearly that, among others, Malaysia is a
multireligious and multiracial nation.
The Rulers have also reminded us to abide by the principles of the Federal
Constitution and the tenets of the Rukunegara, our national philosophy.
How many times do we have to be reminded that moderation is the way forward for our country?
Throughout our six decades of independence, we have been able to enjoy
continuous harmony and prosperity because we acted in accordance with the
principles of our Federal Constitution, which was drafted upon the understanding
that all citizens regardless of race, religion and culture would enjoy fairness
and justice.
Therefore, whatever we do, we must never go overboard in our thoughts and
actions.
Many countries have high regard for Malaysia because of the ability of its
people of diverse racial and religious backgrounds to live in harmony together.
Everyone has a place under the Malaysian sun as long as they work hard and with
integrity.
In fact, we always boast of our vibrant economy, the fruit of decades of
industrial growth and political stability as a result of close cooperation and
understanding among the people.
Surely, our Rulers’ call for moderation, tolerance and respect will resonate
among all Malaysians. We must respond positively to prevent extreme individuals
or groups from derailing our social and economic transformation programmes.
Daulat Tuanku!

Thomas Kok,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia

 


Filipinos recieve a Centenarian gift
On their 100th birthday
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 12 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Sunday 8 October 2017

We celebrate the annual Elderly Filipino Week on Oct. 1-7, with the first Sunday this month as “National Respect for Centenarians Day” pursuant to Republic Act No. 10868 or the Centenarians Act of 2016.
Under this law, any Filipino citizen who reaches the age of 100 years old shall be entitled to the “Centenarian gift” of P100,000 from the national government with a Certificate of Felicitation from the president and with corresponding cash incentives from and determined by the city or municipality where the elderly resides.
Thus, in line with this nationwide celebration, we, the senior citizens, would like to propose the following incentives for the consideration of the President and our lawmakers:
Section 4(c) of RA 9994, which grants to elderly persons “five percent discount on their water and electric bills provided the water consumption does not exceed 30 cubic meters and electric usage does not exceed 100 kWh” be amended to the effect that the discount should be applied to the first 30 cubic meters of water consumption and to the first 100 kWh electric usage. I already sent letters or proposed bills to our legislators and to date I have not yet received any action.
When an item is on “promo” authorized by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), the coupon or advertisement should not only state the “promo price” but shall also include the price if purchased by an elderly or senior citizen. This is so because there are times when the “promo price” is higher than what an elderly would get if he would apply his 12-percent VAT exemption and 20-percent discount. Likewise, if the “promo” goes beyond the period allowed by the DTI, the “promo price” shall be treated as the regular price of the item on promo to which the elderly should be entitled to his 12-percent VAT exemption and 20-percent discount.
The DTI should clearly emphasize that when a “promo” is not allowed by the DTI or the “promo” is a personal undertaking by the firm or establishment, the elderly shall still be entitled to his 12-percent VAT exemption and 20-percent discount over and above the said promo price. The DTI should also stress that said discounts on “promo” should include the so-called “package promo” offered by hospitals, laboratory clinics, restaurants and similar establishments selling combination of items in special price offered to nonsenior citizens and the senior citizens at the same price.
The requirement that promotional discounts should be approved by the DTI is imperatively necessary, otherwise some dishonest firms would just say they are “on promo,” which will render naught and meaningless the purpose of the Senior Citizens Law.
And the same benefits should likewise be extended to persons with disability since they receive the same benefits enjoyed by Filipino senior citizens.

Romulo B. Macalintal,
Advocate for rights of senior citizens,
Las Piñas City,
Philippines



Rohingya in Malaysia
Receive distressing calls from relatives
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 11 October 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Monday 2 October 2017

The atrocities committed against the Rohingya in Rakhine State in Myanmar in the
recent escalation of violence has caused much suffering to those there and the
Rohingya diaspora, many of whom are living in protracted displacement as
refugees and asylum seekers in Bangladesh, Thailand and Malaysia.
The decades-long persecution of the Rohingya in Myanmar has led to hundreds of
thousands fleeing Myanmar.
The latest wave of violence has affected the Rohingya in Malaysia, many of whom
continue to receive distressing reports of relatives who have been killed, are
missing or are struggling with hunger and exhaustion in their journey to safety.
Many have also lost contact with relatives and are gripped by anxiety.
Some community members have considered turning to human smugglers to help their
loved ones make the journey out of Myanmar, thereby increasing the risk of them
being trafficked.
For others, the feeling of relief after family members have crossed over to
Bangladesh is short lived, as they face distressing reports of the lack of
access to food, sanitation and shelter.
The Rohingya in Malaysia with families in Bangladesh and fleeing Myanmar to
Bangladesh are having their meagre resources depleted as they spend exorbitant
amounts of money to communicate with their loved ones and try to support their
flight from violence back home.
Additionally, their fears, uncertainties and dilemma, and the stress of having
to make difficult decisions that impact their lives here and the lives of those
in Rakhine State and Bangladesh have led to a community exhausting their
resources and reaching the end of their tether.
Community members report a deepening sense of helplessness, hopelessness and
desperation.
One community member reported that the only respite from her daily
anguish is the call from her family to communicate to her of their whereabouts.
She said: “Otherwise, what is there to hope? There is no hope.”
This sense of despair and stress exacerbate the distress of a vulnerable
population.
The traumatic preflight and flight conditions of the Rohingya in the
preceding years have resulted in acute and chronic health problems.
For others, the perilous journey has also resulted in post-traumatic stress
disorder and other mental health disorders.
Health Equity Initiatives is concerned about the heightened anxiety and stress
of the Rohingya in Malaysia that is caused by the violence in Rakhine State.
We call on the international community to condemn the human rights violations in
Myanmar and work to stop the atrocities in Myanmar.

Kuala Lumpur,
Malayalsia


Any definitive statement by ASEAN on the Rohingya
To be reached by consensus
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 10 October 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Wednesday 4 October 2017

The Rohingya issue is a crisis that Asean is grappling with, both as an entity and as individual countries.
The crisis is worsening by the day.
Every state must define its position in accordance with its distinct geopolitical situation and within the context of the country’s values.
Any definitive statement by Asean must be reached via consensus.
The statement by Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Anifah Aman gave voice to the sentiments of Malaysians, who are deeply concerned about the Rohingya and who are every day welcoming refugees from Rakhine State as their brothers and sisters.
The perspective of Malaysia on this issue must be given weight proportionate to the nation’s engagement with the crisis, which is greater than any other Asean member state.
Malaysians reject any attempt to obscure the reality of what is taking place, and no one is better positioned to know this reality than the Rohingya themselves.
We applaud the minister for his bravery and honesty, and for affirming the sovereignty of Malaysia in defining the correct narrative on the violence in Rakhine State.

Azril Mohd Amin,
Chief executive,
Centre for Human Rights Research and Advocacy,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia




Millions of Philippine fishers and coastal settlers
Threatened by land reclaimation projects
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 9 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 4 October 2017

We, the small fisherfolk under the banner of Pamalakaya-Pilipinas, express our strong opposition to the confirmation of Roy Cimatu as secretary to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR).
Cimatu has completely aborted the positive gestures of his predecessor Gina Lopez in the environment department, particularly Lopez’s stand against land reclamation projects because of its disastrous effects to the environment and the people’s livelihood.
Contrary to Lopez, who refrained from issuing environmental compliance certificates to reclamation projects, Cimatu in one interview said that he will allow reclamation activities to proceed for it is “allowed by the law.”
With more than 100 reclamation projects covering almost 40,000 hectares of fishing waters approved throughout the archipelago, millions of fisherfolk and coastal settlers are under the threat of widespread community displacement in exchange for eco-tourism hub, commercial business districts, and even government projects that only benefit the private sector.
Reclamation not only threatens the people’s socio-economic rights, it also poses serious damage and destruction to abundant marine resources such as seabed, corals, and mangrove areas resulting to ecosystem imbalance and reduction of marine productivity. Such activity has been legalized by the Philippine Reclamation Authority, an attached agency of the DENR, through the crafting of the National Reclamation Plan.
We fear that keeping Cimatu in his position would expedite the completion of all reclamation projects, and will effectively wipe out productive fishing communities and millions of hardworking fisherfolk from the Philippine map, like what happened to more than 6,000 fishing families in 2002 upon construction of the Entertainment City project in Manila Bay along Roxas Boulevard in Parañaque City.
Cimatu is bringing back the traditional orientation of the DENR as the number one facilitator of destructive projects at the cost of the environment and the welfare of the people.
As a known corrupt former military general who was also a notorious defender of environmental plunderers, Cimatu is morally and politically not suitable to head the environment department.
Instead, we want no less than the likes of Gina Lopez in order to continue the positive reforms on the environment that are also beneficial to the Filipino people.

Fernando Hicap,
National Chair,
Pamalakaya-Pilipinas,
Manila,
Philippines



Call for governments to address climate change
At United Nations climate summit in Germany
The Southeast Asian Times Sunday 8 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer 4 October 2017

News of recent hurricanes in the Caribbean and the US were hard to ignore.
The devastating impacts of these hurricanes hit me deeply and resonated with my memories and experiences.
On this side of the world, in 2013, we endured the most intense storm to ever make landfall in recorded human history when Haiyan or Yolanda as we called it struck the Philippines.
It’s not a coincidence that many of the most powerful storms in history have happened recently.
We are seeing these storms because of climate change - global warming means higher sea surface temperature which means more powerful storms.
Climate change is not a natural phenomenon.
It’s the predictable result of emitting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere at a massive scale.
And one of the biggest causes of these emissions is energy production.
This is what is doubly heartbreaking in the Philippines.
Our energy system is based on burning coal, oil, and gas.
These technologies have been around for hundreds of years but still, almost 20 percent of people living in rural areas don’t have access to electricity.
This poverty makes us even more vulnerable to super storms.
We know that coal, oil, and gas are driving climate change, contributing not just to super storms but to drought, crop damage, and ocean acidification, too.
And we know that these old systems of energy production don’t actually deliver for millions in the Philippines and almost 3 billion worldwide.
That’s why this October, we’ve joined with other organizations in Asia and across the world to push forward an initiative called Reclaim Power.
Reclaim Power is a catalyst for organizations, which don’t normally think about “climate change” or “energy,” to take action and highlight the urgent need for a transformation of our energy systems.
There is already abundant technology that can provide energy to all without burning the planet.
What is needed is a shift in the systems we use to deliver that energy.
We need to direct public (and private) finance and subsidies to encourage 100 percent renewable and clean energy instead of giving handouts to dirty energy companies.
We need to ensure community and public control of our energy systems to ensure that people’s access is prioritized over profit.
And we need to ensure that local and long-term sustainability is considered. Substituting food crops to grow biofuel or flooding the Amazon forest to make a mega dam is not a real solution to climate change or lack of energy access!
To drive this message home to our governments, we are planning over 500 actions across the world, on every continent.
We will create a wave of pressure on our governments before the UN climate summit in Germany in November.
We will host public education events and protest actions in India and in the Philippines, justice caravans in Kenya, memorials in Bolivia, occupations in England, some good old-fashioned tweeting at the World Bank in Washington, and many other actions in many countries across the globe.
All of these show that not only hurricanes can super-charge climate change, but that movements can, too.
People are rising across the world to say our energy systems are broken and that we know how to fix them. I hope you will join us. I know our governments are starting to listen.

Lidy Nacpil,
Manila,
Philippines



Critical thinking remains the best-known antidote
For gullibility
The Southeast Asian TImes, Saturday 7 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 3 October 2017

Gideon Lasco wrote an interesting piece in his September 28 column on Filipino gullibility, citing as one example the recent gathering of thousands at the UP Los Baños Freedom Park to collect their promised share of the Marcos loot, but not before they shelled out P30 each for a pamphlet that extolled the virtues of late dictator Ferdinand E. Marcos.
Other examples of gullibility cited were the pyramid scams, and false and misleading testimonials and advertisements for medicines that do not work (notice how the annotator rushes through, like an express train, that part where the manufacturer disclaims any therapeutic value of their product like they don’t want you to hear it?). Don’t forget the rush of get-rich-quick scams.
To be fair, however, Lasco stated that the malady affects citizens of other countries as well.
One example of gullibility that Lasco failed to mention, however, is the myth of religion and the gullibility of millions of believers.
Hypocrites hide behind the cloak of religion: Imelda Marcos on her knees in Quiapo church as if saying ‘I believe in god, hence I am not guilty of stealing’;
Manny Pacquiao, in a recent incident with a couple of ladies in social media suggesting improper behavior, saying it was done with no malice (His proof? “I fear God.”);
John Paul Solano, the principal suspect in the death of hazing victim Horacio “Atio” Castillo, clutching a large crucifix hanging from his neck, purposely holding it up for all to see while he was being interviewed on television.
So, those who believe cannot be evil?
What does that make of the doubters?
Before the arrival of the Spaniards, our ancestors worshipped the sun, moon, stars, earth, trees and rivers; things that gave them light, nourishment and life.
The tragedy occurred when Spanish priests and conquistadores came to our islands and introduced Christianity with their yarn of an invisible man living in the sky who loves you but if you do not love him back, off you go to hell.
Don’t forget the priests, too, who came with their DNA!
Lasco is right: critical thinking remains the best-known antidote for gullibility.

Robert Alvarez Hyndman,
Manila,
Philippines



God bless Japan
And it’s people.
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 6 October 2017
First published in the Japan Times, Friday 29 September 2017

I was on holiday with family in Japan and on Sepembert 24 I visited the Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Dome. When I was praying for peace and choked with emotion at the Cenotaph for the Atomic Bomb Victims, my kids who were quite restless in the heat found a much-needed light blue Alice in Wonderland umbrella hanging from my backpack!
It was definitely not mine; some really very kind person must have seen the agony my kids were in and put it in my backpack silently so that I could use it for them.
So adorable and how thoughtful and kind.
To that noble person, I’m indebted to you. Arigato from the bottom of my heart. At the place where such a terrible disaster happened, you gave the message of love, kindness and hope. My kids and I learned lot from you … humanity and kindness.
God bless Japan and it’s lovely people.

Monica Munial,
Canberra,
Australia



Thailand has not gone from bad to worse
Under martial law
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 5 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Monday 2 October 2017

In his September 30 comment, Kong Rithdee said: "But still, history tells us that
when a prime minister has been driven out, the country has gone from bad to
worse, from one uncertainty to more uncertainties…"

Perhaps in the past.
Actually Thailand has not gone from bad to worse, but bad to much better than it was before.
At least there are less uncertainties, less corruption, and hopefully, it will get better and better, the longer Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha remains.
Sure, lots of reforms are a long way off, but they were a longer way off with
those past prime ministers who focussed on themselves rather than focusing on
the country.
If Prayut is quite a benevolent dictator in many ways.
Thailand could have had a Hun Sen, a Suu Kyi, (talk about wishy-washy indecisiveness), or even, someone akin to that blob who rules his personal fiefdom called North Korea.

Devilish Mango,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 



Imprisonment of former Thai PM Yingluck Shinawatra
Could have led to civil war
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 4 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Monday 2 October 2017

I would venture to suggest the disappearance of Yingluck Shinawatra to avoid a
jail sentence does not fit in the same category as other examples of criminals
escaping justice in the Land of Smiles.
Whether she is guilty or not is surely irrelevant.
The reality has become clear that to imprison such a personable and inoffensive
lady who enjoys, rightly or wrongly, the passionate support of at least half the
population would have been an act of folly that would have invited divisions
that could have led to unintended consequences, including civil strife and even
civil war.
Frankly, I would hope that all people concerned would appreciate that Yingluck's
departure, from a pragmatic point of view, is by far the best outcome and should
be gratefully accepted as such!

Tony Ash,
Bangkok,
Thailand



Call for law to make public health
Accessible and available to Filipinos
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 3 October 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 2 October 2017

We write to express our earnest support on the passage of House Bill 2475 or “An Act Prohibiting the Privatization of Public Hospitals, Public Health Facilities, and Public Health Services” filed by Bayan Muna party list and the rest of the Makabayan bloc in Congress.
The bill is important in a country: where hospitalization in the Philippines can cost three months’ worth of a worker’s wage; where six out of 10 patients die without ever seeing a doctor; where scores of patients have to line up before the break of dawn in the out-patient department of public hospitals only to be told that the limited slot for charity has already been filled up; where preventable and curable diseases continue to top the leading causes of morbidity and mortality; where it is virtually impossible for people from far-flung areas to consult a health worker because no public health facilities are present and transportation to the “nearest” hospital or clinic is worth a week’s income; or where the sick could hardly get the treatment they need because of user and service fees; and where public healthcare becomes a commodity with a price tag for every service.
The dismal public healthcare service is further aggravated by the continuing adherence of the government to the policy of privatization and corporatization of public hospitals and health facilities.
No less than Health Secretary Paulyn Jean Ubial declared that at least 33 of the 72 public hospitals will be corporatized to gain financial autonomy.
The National Center for Mental Health will be sold and transferred to Rosario, Cavite; Dr. Jose Fabella Memorial Hospital will be transferred and corporatized. Even without any legal basis, government hospitals like Quirino Memorial Medical Center, Eastern Visayas Regional Medical Center, Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center, and Corazon Locsin Montelibano Medical Center have increased fees making it unaffordable for the poor.
Thus, it is high time to pass a law that will make public healthcare more accessible and available to the people and make it illegal to make business out of health in public hospitals, public health facilities, and public health services; that will ensure a public healthcare system fueled by government fund and not indebted to any profit-making entity.
The passage of HB 2475 will bring the Filipino people closer to the healthcare system they truly deserve - free healthcare services in a unified public health system. Under such system, the government assumes full responsibility in the provision of free health services to all people, and provides essential medicines for free. From the national level down to the smallest unit, the government shall ensure adequate funds and resources are allocated using only public money.
The exclusive utilization of public funds for public health facilities will guarantee that healthcare is provided for free and will never be profit-driven or used for income generation at the expense of patients.

Eleanor A. Jara MD.,
Coconvenor,
Coalition for People’s Right to Health,
Manila,
Philippines


 

Laos accused of lacking protection
For foreign investoers
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 2 October 2017
First published in the Vientiane Times, Monday 18 September 2017

Re: “Laos prevails in Hongsa power plant court case”, in Vientiane Times, The
Nation,
Monday September 18.
The Lao Ministry of Planning and Investments presents a completely false picture
of the facts and legal status of the arbitration, according to the claimant,
Thai-Lao Lignite Company Limited (TLL), a company of Thailand’s Nganthavee
Group.Thai-Lao Lignite discovered the lignite mine and was awarded a mining concession from the Lao government’s Foreign Investment Management Committee in 1992 and a second power concession in 1994.
The Nganthavee Group was in the process of developing the project and, in 2005, entered into a joint venture with Banpu Plc.
After TLL terminated Banpu in August 2006, the contract required the project to
revert solely to TLL. Instead, Laos terminated both contracts with TLL in
October 2006 and awarded the deal to Banpu in a no-bid concession in December
2006.
TLL presented evidence that Banpu used confidential documents and information
invested in and developed by TLL.
The Lao government statement quoted by your newspaper falsely states “the
government, therefore, was compelled to terminate the project concessions in
2007” (the year was 2006) and also further falsely says that Laos requested
proposals from “other potential contenders”, when the truth is that the deal was
quickly given to Banpu.
In 2007, according to the 1994 contract, TLL filed for arbitration against the
Lao government and, in November 2009, won the case and was awarded $56 million – not $25 million, as the report incorrectly claims.
The report correctly admits that “the Lao government refused the enforcement of the” award and refused to pay even $1.
The report says that it “requested the Malaysian court, where the arbiter was
seated, to set aside’ the award in 2013”.

This would have been years after the award was issued in TLL’s favour and far beyond the 90-day statute of limitations contained in the Malaysian Arbitration Act. Nevertheless, the Malaysian court improperly allowed the Lao government to proceed and ruled that TLL had to file two separate arbitration cases for the mining and power agreements, rather than combining them.
It did not rule on the merits.Laos then incorrectly states that the Malaysian court’s 2017 ruling brought “the long case to an end, with a clear and important victory for the Lao government”.
In fact, the Malaysian courts made a purely procedural ruling and never
adjudicated the substantive issue at the arbitration, which was Laos’ illegal
termination of TLL’s concession and award of the deal to Banpu.
TLL has hired a new legal team and is presently filing new arbitrations,
litigations and other proceedings against Laos.
The case is not over and only has to be refiled.
Far from being “a clear and important victory”, Laos’ actions during the 11-year period from 2006-2017 show its lack of protection for foreign investors and
consistent refusal to pay arbitration awards against it, despite Laos being a
signatory of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards (New York Convention).
On June 29, the latest US State Department 2017 Investment Climate Statement
about Laos said: “Investors report that corruption at all levels of the public
sector and government administration remains a major concern.”

The 2012 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index ranked the
country 160th out of 176 countries.
Sanum Investments in Singapore is another example of the Lao government’s
expropriation and refusal to pay, as is the infamous Gem Mining (“Danes”) case.
It has never honoured or paid an award or judgement made against it.
Even worse is that the Lao government profited financially from the termination
of TLL and delivering the project to TLL’s partner, Banpu. Under TLL’s
contracts, Laos was prohibited from owning shares in the Hongsa project.
But this time the Lao government required Banpu to give it a big share after taking
the project away from TLL.
According to the website of Hongsa Plc, www.hongsapower.com, the hareholders
are Banpu Power Plc (BPP) with 40 per cent, RH International (Singapore)
Corporation Pte Ltd, a subsidiary of Ratchaburi Electricity Generating Holding
Plc (RATCH) with 40 per cent, and Lao Holding State Enterprise (LHSE) with 20
per cent. Thus, Laos gained 20 per cent of a $3.5-billion project, or Bt23
billion, from its illegal acts.
Now that the extent of the damages to TLL are more clearly shown by Ratchburi’s
recently announced doubling the size of the project and Banpu Power’s IPO, TLL
is confident that the future proceedings will be able to award the correct level
of damages to the plaintiff.

Nganthavee Group
Thai-Lao Lignite,
Bangkok,
Thailand


 

Call for construction of railway
From Nong Khai to Nakhon Ratchasima
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 1 October 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Thursday 28 September 2017

It is good news that the railway project that links Bangkok and Nakhon
Ratchasima is moving ahead in November in Bangkok Post, Tuesday 26 September.
But there is one curious question: If the railway is meant to link the Sino-Lao-Thai railway system in order to increase the flow of traffic between China and Thailand, why don't we build the Nong Khai to Nakhon Ratchasima line first?
If so, Chinese tourists can come down through Laos and open up the unexplored
tourism industry for the great Isan area, not to mention that many Isan goods,
especially agricultural products, can become competitive by travelling via the
new rail line to China.
Instead of shunting the Isan region which is widely believed by the regime to be
the political base of their opposition, it should build up credit among the
people there by implementing solid projects that can enhance the region's
economy, not the other way round.

Yingwai Suchaovanich,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 


Thailand
To get worked over
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 30 September 2017
First published in the Nation, Wednesday 27 September 2017

Re: “Premier’s US itinerary confirmed amid human-rights concerns affecting Thailand”, The Nation, Tuesday 26 September 2017.
Acting US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian Affairs Susan Thornton
said “the US wanted Thailand to crack down on North Korean companies in the Kingdom as well as put pressure on its diplomatic mission”.
They will pressure the good general to do more to stifle North Korean business
in Thailand.
If he does not agree, the US will threaten trade sanctions.
The problem with being the all-powerful leader is that Trump can ask him to do
things knowing that Prayut need not to worry about a parliament or Thai public
opinion. Prayut’s desperation for recognition will be used against him.
He is going to get worked over.

Yellowboat,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 


Rankhin conflict in Myanmar
Beyond the blame game
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 28 September 2017
First Published in the Myanmar Times, Monday 25 September 2017

Coverage of the Rakhine crisis in The Myanmar Times since 25 August has diverged substantially from that of the international media.
I have, however, been somewhat reassured to read editorials in your paper such as “Rakhine conflict: beyond the blame game” in 15 September Myanmar Times and “Rakhine situation: fact versus fiction” in 22 September Myanmar Times.
These editorials urge a balanced, research-based approach to reporting on the crisis which is clearly welcome and required.
I was therefore aghast after turning to page 7 of Friday’s Myanmar Times edition and reading the opinion piece by Daw Khin Thidar Aye titled “Truth about Rakhine will prevail”.
The piece almost entirely comprises dangerous contentions which are not supported by a shred of evidence.
To give but five examples:
“The world is being deceived by fake news and biased analysis of the conflict in Rakhine State.” “As a result, international policy and investment are supporting the villains and fertilizing terrorist breeding grounds.” “The mainstream media is exaggerating the exodus of Bengalis from Myanmar to Bangladesh”. “ARSA terrorists have burned tens of thousands of houses to the ground, driving their own people to the other side of the border. Meanwhile moderate Bengalis are threatened and forced to lie to the media that the human rights abuses and destruction were committed by security personnel.” “ARSA planted landmines in conflict zones”.
In “Rakhine conflict: beyond the blame game,” your editorial team writes
“misinformation about the situation could have serious repercussions and cause further delays in humanitarian assistance”.
Daw Khin Thidar Aye has produced the most egregious example of misinformation that I have read in an edited publication since the escalation of the Rakhine conflict on 25 August.
I would hope, though I do not expect, that The Myanmar Times’ editorial team will
distance itself from this piece in Monday’s edition.
Rather it seems likely that I will choose to cancel my subscription, active since May 2014.
I will continue my subscription to the Global New Light of Myanmar.
It at least makes no secret of the fact that it is a government mouthpiece.

Name withheld by request
Sanchaung township,
Myanmar




Marist Brothers in the Philippines
Denounce extrajudicial killings
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 28 September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 26 September 2017

We, the Marist Brothers of the Schools in the Philippines, denounce the use of extrajudicial killings (EJKs) as the most expedient way to solve peace and order problems.
Summary killings will never ever make our communities safe and secure!
Killers - state-sponsored or not - who wield their guns and oftentimes covered with bonnets - freely roaming around without being made responsible for their crimes - are phantoms lurking in the night.
And no doubt, this state of impunity brought about by the blithe disregard for life will leave a trans-generational trauma in our national consciousness.
Invoking the primacy of the Abrahamic faith principle of the sanctity of the right to life, together with the Catholic Bishops of the Philippines, religious congregations and faiths, academic circles, human rights and peace networks, we therefore urge:
All the major branches of the government executive, legislative and judiciary to adhere to the protocol laid down by the Universal Declaration on Human Rights of which the Philippines is a signatory.
The Philippine National Police, Armed Forces of the Philippines and National Bureau of Investigation to professionalize and cleanse their ranks of rogue elements;
The media and journalists to be factual and impartial in reporting incidents of crime and abuses without fear or favor.
The citizenry to be proactively involved in preventing crimes and human rights abuses in their respective communities and report occurrences of the same to authorities.
The ethico-spiritual leaders to always speak truth to power.
The academic community to continue to form our faculty’s and students’ consciences in the light of our cherished values as Filipinos;
The civil-society to link and partner with authentically democratic institutions, parties and social movements which can press for reforms in peace and security policies and programs;
The national and local leaders to refrain from using rhetorics of death, hate and violence, but instead promote a culture of peace, filial respect and solidarity.
Those who are involved in “demonic” acts such as production, proliferation and use of dangerous drugs; Extrajudicial killings (EJKs) violent extremism and terrorism, extortions, abuse of women and children, kidnapping for ransom, robbery, bribery, corruption, and exploitation, that they will have genuine conversion, for crime does not pay.
All peace-loving men and women of goodwill to earnestly Pray for Peace in our fragile land and let not the forces of darkness triumph by our inaction due to fear of reprisal.
As a positive and pro-active response to the prevailing national situation, we the Marist Brothers, commit to make our communities, schools and pastoral ministries as centers of peace.

Br. Lindley Sionosa, FMS,
Philippine sector coordinator,
Br. Manuel V. De Leon, FMS,
Kidapawan Community,
Superiors’ Group chair and 10 others heads of the Society of Martys in the Philippines,
Manila,
Philippines




The injustice of the war on drugs in the Philippines
A
ffects all Filipinos
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 27 September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 26 September 2017

In the light of recent events concerning the Commission on Human Rights budget, we can’t help but recall the unjust killing of Kian delos Santos as if it were some sort of foreshadowing on the horrors that have already begun to dawn upon our country.
Kian was a 17-year-old boy who pleaded for his life last August but was still mercilessly shot dead - not by criminals nor the feared drug abusers - but by law enforcers themselves.
However, Kian was not the only one who suffered this fate.
There were thousands before Kian, and thousands more now, who are subjected to these unjust murders.
People tend to turn a blind eye to what is a clear violation of human rights as they believe that this is what it takes to build a safer community.
However, that’s what is peculiar about human rights:
You can’t expect to justify the violation of the rights of one, without degrading the value of rights for everyone.
Now, what seemed to only affect alleged criminals loitering on the streets has affected us all. Because we deemed their lives to be worthless, our rights were reduced to the worth of a lousy P1,000 bill by our own congressmen.
(The Lower House has since restored the CHR’s budget.—Ed)
That is why when we hear about these killings we should no longer let ignorance get in the way. Instead, we should get angry, we should be mad, and we should fight because we are affected as well.

Mia Abalos,
Alexa Abaya,
Rianne Igao,
Chinkee Naagas,
Brianna Sarile,
Kaye Trindad,
Manila,
Philippines




Call for Malaysian government
To monitor fake claims
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 26 September 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Thursday 14 September 2017

Many may remember the Lynas issue and its rare earth business that was raised at the last general election.
The issue of Lynas almost took centre stage then.
The opposition made all kinds of claims on rare earth, all in the interest of securing votes.
One claim was that the processing of rare earth would be disastrous for the public, especially those living near the Lynas plant.
They produced fake evidence linking rare earth to cancer and other side effects. Their exaggerated claims somehow caused some unease among the people there.
The public took the opposition’s bait mainly because they were ignorant.
Rare earth processing is a new business in the country, although rare earth itself is not entirely new.
During the era of tin mining, waste from tin processing comprised rare earth.
And, children, including some among the vocal critics of Lynas, used to run around such tin mining waste, including a few of our colleagues at the Academy of Sciences.
They are all fine despite the exposure.
It was a pity such an issue was exploited at great cost. It was, to some extent, a waste of public money. At the academy, we spent time and money building factual information on rare earth.
I was sent to visit a thriving rare earth facility in La Rochelle, France. The aim was to gather evidence on the safety aspects of rare earth processing. To my surprise, the facility has been operating for decades with no harm inflicted on the environment.
In fact, La Rochelle itself was, and still is, a thriving tourist destination, attracting visitors from the European Union and the world.
Fellows of the academy appeared on television and radio to explain to the public that rare earth waste was not like nuclear waste. The radioactive level was extremely low, oftentimes lower than the natural background levels around Kuantan.
There are lessons that we can learn from the Lynas incident.
We should never take things for granted when it comes to bringing in investment to the country.
Rare earth processing is a good example where those opposed to the government’s well-meaning intention to bring in foreign direct investments and jobs twisted facts to confuse the public.
They hoped to derail the project.
That would have been unfortunate because the demand for rare earth in the new digital economy is expected to continue rising.
At the academy, we have even produced a report urging the government to initiate our own rare earth industry.
Our studies have shown that we do have healthy deposits of the more expensive heavy rare earth that is ready to be mined.
We have even drawn up a plan on how to move that industry as another source of revenue for the country.
Admittedly, the nation needs to diversify its revenue streams.
Though the government has, over the years, done much to diversify the economy, moving away from total reliance on oil, we need to be on the constant lookout for emerging opportunities.
With the advent of the new global economic order revolving around Industry 4.0, the rare earth business will, undoubtedly, be prominent in the coming years.
The other lesson from the Lynas incident is that we need to monitor scientific claims in the media.
Many errant parties are spreading fake scientific information to dupe the public to buy their products.
The palm oil industry is aware of such tactics.
There are also those peddling all kinds of medicines, spreading false science.
We need to have a group of scientists working closely with the media to monitor such fake information.
The academy can host this group.
With the 14th General Election looming, the government should monitor the emergence of fake claims, as was the case with Lynas.
For matters related to science, the academy has the expertise to do so.

Professor Datuk Dr. Ahmad Ibrahim,
UCSI University,
Fellow Academy of Sciences Malaysia,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia



China trying to challenge the US
Over the South China Sea
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 25 September 2017
First published in the Nation, Wednesday 20 September 2017

The Pentagon on Friday Septemmber 15 said it was concerned about an “unsafe and unprofessional” encounter between two Chinese fighters and a US surveillance plane over the South China Sea.
The Chinese J-10 warplanes intercepted a US Navy P-3 that was operating in international airspace on Wednesday, Pentagon spokesman Commander Gary Ross said.
As a defence analyst/researcher, I believe that China is trying to challenge the US after a US destroyer sailed in disputed South China Sea waters near a reef claimed by Beijing in the first freedom of navigation exercise under President Donald Trump.
The manoeuvres come ahead of a major regional security summit in Singapore next week.
It is a good strategy by China to signal a warning to Asean and the US about the latter’s defence posturing.
Meanwhile, the aircrew deemed the intercept unsafe and unprofessional.
There was no proper channel that China went to for the operation.

Jumel G Estranero,
Bangkok,
Thailand


Friendship with China is a pillar
Of Philippine foreign policy.
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 24 September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 20 September 2017

It has almost been over a year since President Rodrigo Duterte declared his
“independent foreign policy”.
His policy has been variously described as “isolationist”, “anti-American”, and
even “pro-Chinese”.
Some suggest that the anti-American slant is a result of just a petty personal grudge by the president over the rejection of a US visa application some years back. Former national security adviser Jose Almonte tried to put some sense into it.
He defined it “as not for or against anybody but equidistant to everyone”.
If Almonte’s definition is accepted, then we have, effectively, a policy of nonalignment.
Whatever may be the true intentions of its architect, where has this policy led
us to so far?
President Duterte has continually badmouthed our American and Western European allies.
He rejected their aid and loan offers for “interfering in our domestic affairs” through their calls for a stop to the drug war killings and for full observance of human rights. At this point, it is still unclear whether investments from our (former) allies have shied away from the country, but it is reported that a number already doing business here are withholding expansion plans. A wait-and-see attitude appears to be in place.
This is not good news for our economy.
It was reported that President Duterte was not invited to the G20 Summit in
Hamburg, Germany, last July 7-8 even as tradition holds.
On the other side of the ledger, friendship with China is an avowed pillar of
Duterte’s foreign policy.
And how better to prove this than the package of loans totalling $24 billion that Duterte came home with from his state visit to China.
But as the saying goes: Beware of friends bearing gifts. Socioeconomic Planning
Secretary Ernesto Pernia announced that China’s Official Development Assistance
loans will carry a rate of 2-3 per cent (where Japan’s ODAs will charge less
than 1 per cent).
We should hold no illusions that we are now on the friendly side of China.
Far from it.
China wants nothing from us but the following: Disavow the Arbitral Ruling favourable to us issued by the Tribunal Court in The Hague on July 12, 2016, so that our loss of reefs and shoals now occupied by China becomes permanently lost to them.
It is that simple.

Mariano S Javier,
Manila,
Philippines




Thai students at English language classes
Converse in Thai
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 23 September 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Tuesday 12 September 2017

Re: "Language lesson for Thailand," in Bangkok Post, Sunday 10 September 2017
I have seen similar enthusiasm in young school students in Vietnam. While going
around the Hoan Kiem Lake in Hanoi, I found many students striking a casual
conversation with a foreigner just to talk and improve their English.
On the other hand, many Thai youngsters who spend millions to attend
international universities located in Bangkok shun English. It seems they just
want to socialise and feel proud of attending a hi-so university. While
attending English-language classes they tend to converse in Thai.
Sooner or later, they graduate mastering a few sentences, such as, "same, same
but different", "I go with you", "Why you no happy?" "I happy", or "I am so
exciting". Many Thai instructors also use the same lingo.

Kuldeep Nagi,
Bangkok,
Thailand



Call for Thai PM and government officials
To live on minimum wage
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 22 September 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 13 September 2017

The refusal by the government and industrial sector to raise the minimum wage to
700 baht per day is telling.
If the economy and "Thailand 4.0" can only be sustained by paying a poverty wage instead of a living wage, than there is really no hope.
It smacks of elitism when those at the top believe the ones at the bottom must suffer so they remain in their levels of economic comfort.
To say that labourers being paid 700 baht would make "as high as 20,000 baht per month" and positioning this as a negative because it would be higher than the
monthly 15,000 baht for college graduates exposes two major problems instead of
justifying the action.
First is the assumption that labourers must work seven days a week since that is what they are forced to do at 350 baht per day for survival.
That is how the figure is arrived at.
It is really 14,000 baht a month.I wonder if the industry leaders and government officials responsible for this "refusal" work seven days a week with no vacations or leisure.
Second, if college graduates are only being paid poverty wages, then what is the
incentive to go to school and incur debt/cost?
Something is wrong with this scenario.
If the skilled are not valued in the economic model, what real hope is there?
How about having the PM and all future elected government officials be not only
paid, but forced to actually "live" on the prevailing minimum wage?
This is the only action that would force a true change in the economy that would allow everyone to thrive instead of the lower classes just surviving.
This might reduce the prevalence of coups and actually promote stability.
You want an example of a nearby country with a living wage and decent healthcare
and a thriving economy?
Look no further than Australia for the naysayers.

Darius Hober,
Bangkok,
Thailand



Freedom of speech in the Philippines
Challenged by threats and intimidation
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 21 September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 19 September 2017

Free expression thrives well in a democracy.
This includes raising questions and criticisms to check perceived abuses by those in power. But now, this freedom is utterly being challenged by threats and intimidation from the administration.
This is best illustrated by the fate of those criticizing and disapproving some actions and intentions of the present administration.
For instance, when Vice President Leni Robredo condemned in a video message the extrajudicial killings in connection with the drug war, she was threatened outright with impeachment (for treachery) by administration henchmen led by Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez.
Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, acting in accordance with constitutional mandate to cite legal points, met impeachment calls from the same quarter who thought that she was interfering with the executive turf.
The likes of Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV, a staunch Duterte critic, naturally, could not escape the harangues of administration defenders whenever he expounds on the issue of the day.
But among them, Sen. Leila de Lima suffered the worst as a dissenter.
She has been critical of President Duterte since the latter was Davao City mayor, when at the time — as chair of the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) — she conducted an investigation on the mayor’s alleged human rights violations.
Mr. Duterte considered that occasion too unforgivable that he relentlessly pursued the imprisonment of De Lima who he dubbed as protector of drug lords in the New Bilibid Prison.
Even the Court of Appeals got the ire of Speaker Alvarez when it ruled on the release of the “Ilocos Six” from detention in the House of Representatives.
The overreaching speaker threatened to abolish the court, unmindful of the constitutional crisis it may create.
In the meantime, President Duterte, bristling from the inquiries of the CHR on his drug war, has sent warnings to abolish the entire organization, without deference to the value of human life. Anyway, the President would not take heed of this great concern of humanity!

Nesty Reyes,
Bacoor City,
Cavite,
Philippines

 


Call for private religious schools in Malaysia
To be accountable
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 20 September 2017
First published in the Star, Friday 15 September 2017

G25 welcomes the announcement by the Deputy Prime Minister for an immediate inquiry into the tragedy at the Darul Quran Ittifaqiyah tahfiz school and hopes that a special committee will be formed to investigate the matter without delay.
G25 has among its members retired senior judges, civil servants and diplomats who can volunteer to sit as members of the committee.
They are willing to assist in finding out how and why the tragedy happened and the lessons that can be learnt so that the religious department in all states can exercise proper regulatory control over these private religious schools.
The religious authorities should not resist the open inquiry into the manner in which private religious schools are run.
Indeed, all parties should support the setting up of the special committee proposed by the Deputy Prime Minister because it is in the public’s interest to ensure that the founders and principals of these schools be made accountable for any failures to provide safety for the children under their charge.
This is normal practice in democratic and civil societies, and reflects a caring and responsible nation.
Malaysia should not exempt religious schools from the principles of common justice or hide the underlying problems of religious education from public scrutiny as this will only lead to similar tragedies recurring in the future.
All private religious schools should be subjected to minimum standards for boarding institutions, including a proper teacher/student ratio and adherence to fire and safety standards.
It has been reported that more than 200 fires have occurred at tahfiz schools nationwide since 2015.
With a problem of such magnitude these schools, whether they come under the purview of the Education Ministry or otherwise, should as a minimum be immediately subjected to an inspection on the fire and safety standards before another tragedy occurs.

G25 Malaysia,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia



US hand in friendship
A huge boost to Malaysia
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 19 September 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Saturday 16 September 2017

The 60th anniversary of diplomatic relations between Malaysia and the United States reflects the long-running mutual commitment to further cement the solid foundation of ties.
The recent visit by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to the US on the invitation of President Donald Trump will elevate the current state of warm relations to a higher level. Bilateral relations between the US and Malaysia certainly have improved over the past decade with back-to-back visits by former president Barack Obama to Malaysia.
The importance of this long-standing relationship with the world’s biggest superpower encompasses a wide range of areas, including commerce, trade, defence, security, education and science and technology.
We have been benefiting immensely from the superior technology and know-how of the Americans, strong economic and technological cooperation and mutual collaboration.
The US is a crucial partner to us in continuing to boost our economic growth and stability.
The end of the Cold War brought about a seismic shift in global security, bringing with it new threats and challenges that are non-traditional in nature.
A close global cooperation and sharing of expertise and know-how between the two countries will go a long way in ensuring a stable and manageable regional and global security.
The US can provide the much- needed counterbalance against the growing influence of China, as well as act as a partner in counterterrorism in the region.
With security threats and challenges coming in various forms and from different sources, there is no better time than now to seize the day to work together in providing a mutually beneficial partnership.
With growing tension over North Korea and the potential catastrophic ripples and instability that it will create, as well as the unresolved Rohingya crisis in Myanmar, there is an urgent need to push for a careful and delicate strategy in striving for regional stability and security.
Actions and steps taken to address these crises are not to be directed from a single source or a superpower alone. It requires the right support, understanding, input and actions of all regional actors and players.
If mismanaged, these crises will result in a full-blown humanitarian catastrophe.
This is where the presence and support of the US in extending the hand of friendship will be a huge booster. Malaysia has taken the leadership in the past in working with American counterparts and is doing so now through the prime minister’s visit to the US.
We have been at the forefront of extending a helping hand to mediate and to lend our support in providing peaceful solutions to regional conflicts.
This proven track record can be used to push for a moderate and peaceful solution to conflicts in the region and trouble spots elsewhere.
The prospect of the region being the next driver of global political and economic arenas will surely invite greater scrutiny and interest from outside players, but through the principle of moderation, Malaysia and the US can bring about a peaceful solution to conflicts and, at the same time, preserve regional peace.
It is time Malaysia used our exceptional legacy of being a moderate and tolerant nation as a positive example for all to emulate.
We should extend the reach of moderation to the global arena, starting with the forging of closer and enhanced ties with our old friends in the Americans and to leverage on their support to continue to push for voices of tolerance and peaceful coexistence and the spirit of humanity and compassion.

Collins Chomg Yew Keat,
Universiti Malaya,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia



Homes in Malaysia
Are simply not affordable.
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 18 September 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, 6 September 2017

What does the term “affordable homes” mean?
After all, what determines whether a house is affordable is based on the income of the targeted consumers.
According to Khazanah Research Institute and Bank Negara Malaysia, the sign of a well-functioning and affordable home market is when the median price for the housing market is three times the gross annual household income.
Bank Negara would add that the monthly payment for the house should not be more than 30 per cent of the income. Payments of more than 30 per cent would be considered overburdening for the consumer.
Based on the above criteria, Bank Negara would suggest that an affordable home in Malaysia, based on the monthly median income of RM4,585 and the annual median income of RM55,020, is between RM165,000 and RM242,000.
In Malaysia, house prices are 4.4 times the median income.
Further, zeroing in on the states, house prices in Kuala Lumpur are 5.4 times, 5.2 times in Penang Island, 4.2 times in Johor and in Selangor, four times the median income.
While, according to Bank Negara, the affordable home is priced at RM242,000, in actual fact, the average price of houses in Kuala Lumpur is RM490,000; in Selangor RM300,000; Johor, RM260,000; and Penang Island, RM295,000.
To put it simply, houses in Malaysia are simply not affordable.Efforts should be made to reduce the prices of houses to an affordable range of about RM250,000 to RM300,000. Yet in 2014, only 21 per cent of new housing launches were priced below RM250,000.
There was a gross oversupply of houses above RM500,000 and an undersupply of houses below RM250,000. No wonder there is a mismatch between demand and supply.Bank Negara would suggest that between 2012 and 2014, there was a housing supply average of 85,000 units, while 118,000 households were formed.
Instead of putting policy interventions into place to reduce the prices of houses, developers are putting pressure on banks to give loans to consumers who cannot afford these expensive homes.
They want banks and Bank Negara to ease lending practices to make it easy for house owners to own properties.
The principle seems to be not to build houses that consumers can afford, but to build overpriced houses, and then put pressure on the lending institutions to give loans to the consumers.
Never mind the risks to the banks and the financial burden to consumers. Developers want to sell the overpriced homes that they have built.
There have even been proposals to set up a fund so that consumers can save early to afford overpriced homes.
The risks and burden is being pushed to the banks and consumers, while developers can continue to build overpriced homes.
The Federation of Malaysian Consumer Associations (Fomca) calls on the government to ensure that priority is given to homes Malaysians can truly afford.
The number of 1Malaysia People’s Housing (PR1MA) homes being built is way below the demand for new households.
The government needs to intervene and regulate the private sector to supply more affordable homes.
The government also needs to strengthen measures to eliminate speculation in the market, which inflates home prices. Polices should make speculation expensive to protect first-time home buyers.
Housing is a basic right of consumers. It is the government’s role to ensure that all Malaysian have access to affordable homes. The government should also focus on promoting a thriving rental market so that renting becomes a viable option for consumers.
Fomca proposes that government invests more in financial education for all consumers, especially young workers, to create awareness and build knowledge and skills on prudent financial management and making informed decisions in the market, including purchasing major assets such as houses.

Datuk Paul Selva Raj,
Secretary-general,
Federation of Malaysian Consumer Associations,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia




Enactment of the free college education law
An inexcusable faux pas
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 17 September 2017
Philippine Inquirer 5 Sept 2017, Tuesday 5 September 2017

Current media reports disclose that the recently-enacted Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education Act (RA 10931) does not provide the funding support for the government subsidy that will underwrite the payment of tuition in state colleges and universities.
It is reported that the law does not even have any working estimate of how much money is to be spent for the purpose. Nor does it identify the source of the funds to be allocated as government subsidy.
Now comes President Duterte who openly admits that the funding for the government subsidy is problematic because according to his economic managers who had opposed enactment of the law, the government just does not have the money to implement it.
Such absence of fund support creates a vacuum that renders the law inherently flawed, an oddity in public finance that should be eschewed.
To the extent then that government subsidy from public funds is needed to underwrite the payment of tuition in state colleges and universities, the free college education law partakes of the nature of a special appropriation law within the ambit of Section 25 (4), Article VI of the 1987 Constitution that states: “A special appropriations bill shall specify the purpose for which it is intended; and shall be supported by funds actually available as certified by the National Treasurer, or to be raised by a corresponding revenue proposal therein.”
By failing to indicate where the funds will be sourced from, the law does violate this mandate of the Constitution and, hence, is deemed as constitutionally noncompliant.
As it is then, so long as the law under scrutiny, in its present form, remains unfunded, it is unimplementable and likely to be reduced to a dead letter.
From the constitutional perspective, I view the enactment of the free college education law as an inexcusable faux pas.


Bartolome C. Fernandez Jr.,
Retired senior commissioner,
Commission on Audit,
Manila,
Philippines



Malaysia calls for economic sanctions
On Myanmar
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 16 September 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Tuesday 12 September 2017

The atrocities committed by the Myanmar authorities on the Rohingya in Rakhine and other parts of Myanmar are well known to the international community.
Despite exhortations from Asean, world leaders and Nobel Laureates, there seems to be no redress or reduction to the conflict.
Malaysian non-governmental organisations and professional groups like the Muslim Professionals Forum have lucidly highlighted the situation and also reiterated possible measures to contain, if not solve, the problem.
These ideas seek to call on Asean and global organisations like the United Nations to pressure the Myanmar government to immediately and positively address the issue.
The Rohingya, pushed to a corner and deprived of basic necessities, have tried to flee to neighbouring Bangladesh and to nearby Asean countries by sea but even these attempts are fraught with risks, forcing them to retaliate in a futile way, only for the Myanmar authorities to increase their atrocities.
Therefore, urgent, specific and concrete measures are needed to alleviate this tragedy.
It is with great admiration that I read Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan offering to pay for the costs borne by Bangladesh in accepting and hosting Rohingya refugees temporarily until a more lasting solution is found.
I hope other rich countries can be magnanimous.
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) should actively get more support for such measures.
Granted, there may be bad elements in the exodus, and UNHCR should vigorously help host governments filter and channel the refugees to manpower-deficient countries.
Malaysia, for instance, has a large pool of legal and illegal workers.
Accepting the refugees to work legally in sectors with labour shortage like in plantations, construction and the service sector, should be a priority.
Workers from Myanmar, including the Rohingya, are visible in the Malaysian labour force, but there is room for them, especially after the repatriation of illegal foreign workers.
Rohingya women should be prepared to work as domestic helpers as the demand for maids is high. In due time, it is hoped that other Asean countries and also other countries in the Arabian Gulf Cooperation Region may emulate the Malaysian model, which we hope will be fruitful and be recorded by history as the management of one of the worst humanitarian crises of the century.
Since the Myanmar government is not yielding to world pressure, it is time the world community imposes economic sanctions on Myanmar.

A.S.M. Shariff,
Petaling Jaya,
Malaysia




Call for Malaysia to sign
1951 Refugee Convention
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 15 September 2017
First published in the Star, Tuesday 12 September 2017

If Malaysia is serious about helping the Rohingya who have been refugees and asylum seekers in our country for many years, the Government must consider signing the convention on refugees along with its protocol relating to refugees.
Thousands of Rohingya have fled their home country over the past few years to seek refuge in neighbouring countries including Malaysia.
According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), there were some 149,100 refugees and asylum-seekers registered with UNHCR in Malaysia as of June 30 this year.
Of these, some 132,100 are from Myanmar, comprising 61,000 Rohingya, 38,200 Chin, 9,900 Myanmar Muslims, 4,200 Rakhine and Arakanese, and other ethnic groups.
The Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, also known as the 1951 Refugee Convention, is a United Nations multilateral treaty that defines a refugee and sets out the right of individuals who are granted asylum and the responsibilities of nations that grant asylum.
The Convention also sets out which people do not qualify as refugees, such as war criminals.
The Convention builds on Article 14 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which recognises the right of persons to seek asylum from persecution in other countries.
A refugee may also enjoy rights and benefits in a state in addition to those provided for in the Convention.
The Malaysian Government has till now not signed the Convention along with its protocol.
So far, 145 countries have become parties to this Convention. If the consequences of becoming a signatory member to the Convention are bad, why were these countries willing to sign this Convention in the first place?
As such, the Malaysian Government should reconsider its position on this issue.

Dr Muzaffar Syah Mallow,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia


Prosecution of fugitive former Thai PM Yingluck Shinawatra
Covered under new law
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 14 September 2017
First published in Bangkok Post, Tuesday 12 September 2017

Re: "Aim for the statutes," in Bangkok Post PostBag, Friday 8 September 2017
One does not need Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha's power of Section 44 to exclude the
period during which someone is on the run from the statute of limitations.
It applies to all crimes committed in the area of public affairs, Section 24/1
Criminal Procedure Code relating to politicians.
That does not apply to the Red Bull case.
This was a quick amendment made by an unelected government in response to
outcries about so many corrupt political and official convicts fleeing Thailand
in style.
Ms Yingluck will be the first case covered under this new law if she is convicted on September 27.
At least, that is one nice thing about being undemocratic for a change - the
power to ensure a quick response for real justice!

Songdej Praditsmanont
Bangkok,
Thailand




Turkey offers to pay for costs borne by Bangladesh
To accept and host Rohingya refugees from Myanmar
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 13 September 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Tuesday 12 September 2017

The atrocities committed by the Myanmar authorities on the Rohingya in Rakhine and other parts of Myanmar are well known to the international community.
Despite exhortations from Asean, world leaders and Nobel Laureates, there seems to be no redress or reduction to the conflict.
Malaysian non-governmental organisations and professional groups like the Muslim Professionals Forum have lucidly highlighted the situation and also reiterated possible measures to contain, if not solve, the problem.
These ideas seek to call on Asean and global organisations like the United Nations to pressure the Myanmar government to immediately and positively address the issue.
The Rohingya, pushed to a corner and deprived of basic necessities, have tried to flee to neighbouring Bangladesh and to nearby Asean countries by sea but even these attempts are fraught with risks, forcing them to retaliate in a futile way, only for the Myanmar authorities to increase their atrocities. Therefore, urgent, specific and concrete measures are needed to alleviate this tragedy.
It is with great admiration that I read Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan offering to pay for the costs borne by Bangladesh in accepting and hosting Rohingya refugees temporarily until a more lasting solution is found.
I hope other rich countries can be magnanimous. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) should actively get more support for such measures.
Granted, there may be bad elements in the exodus, and UNHCR should vigorously help host governments filter and channel the refugees to manpower-deficient countries. Malaysia, for instance, has a large pool of legal and illegal workers.
Accepting the refugees to work legally in sectors with labour shortage like in plantations, construction and the service sector, should be a priority.
Workers from Myanmar, including the Rohingya, are visible in the Malaysian labour force, but there is room for them, especially after the repatriation of illegal foreign workers.
Rohingya women should be prepared to work as domestic helpers as the demand for maids is high. In due time, it is hoped that other Asean countries and also other countries in the Arabian Gulf Cooperation Region may emulate the Malaysian model, which we hope will be fruitful and be recorded by history as the management of one of the worst humanitarian crises of the century.
Since the Myanmar government is not yielding to world pressure, it is time the world community imposes economic sanctions on Myanmar.

A.S.M. Shariff,
Petaling Jaya
Malaysia



Philippine youth ready to fight
For those who cannot fight for themselves
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 12 September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 5 September 2017

We are the youth and we are afraid.
The killing of Kian Loyd delos Santos has created a frightening atmosphere for each and every one of us. President Duterte’s “advocacy” is not the change that we wanted because these extrajudicial killings do not only execute lives, but also murder justice.
If we continue to live in a country built upon violence and inhumanity, what will our future be?
We are the youth and we are angry.
We are angry because ordinary people are accused of crimes and are killed without having the right to due process.
Life is being played with, and our lives are being held in the hands of those who do not seem to value it.
Our national police is sworn to protect each citizen, yet recent events have illustrated the lack of moral authority.
From our perspective, the government hopes to reach an ideal future for our country through these executions, yet this completely takes away that possibility for many.
We are the youth and we are ready.
Although these actions fill us with anger and fear, these sentiments will not hinder us from battling these unjust measures.
We are ready to be the change that we believe is necessary for our country.
With a lack of protection and welfare from those accountable of it, we shall ensure that the power of our speech will restore dignity back to our nation.
We are ready to take a stand against the measures on the war on drugs in order to bring back the humanity that has shamefully been lost.
We are the youth and we are ready to fight for those who can no longer fight for themselves.

Trini Daco, Bella Gironella, Chesca Sarmiento, Andy Velasco, Amaya Lacson and Juliana Salazar
Manila,
Philippines

 



Call for Myanmar government to change
It's behavour towards Rohingya Muslims
The Southeast Asian Times Monday 11 September 2017
First published in the Star, Thursday 7 September 2017

The Rohingya, or at least some Rohingya, are now being projected as terrorists who are out to kill Myanmar soldiers and civilians.
Myanmar leaders including Aung San Suu Kyi have spoken along these lines.
This view of the Rohingya is being propagated by the Myanmar government with greater zeal since a small armed group called the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) attacked security forces on October 9, 2016.
These attacks have continued in recent weeks.
In this new wave of violence, it is alleged that 12 security personnel were killed while the Myanmar military and border police have killed 77 Rohingya Muslims.
The way Aung San Suu Kyi and her government colleagues have framed the clashes ignores the brutal massacres committed by the military over a long period of time.
The oppression and persecution of the Rohingya by the State and other forces have been thoroughly documented by the United Nations Human Rights Council and other independent human rights groups.
It is well known that as a community, the Rohingya were stripped of Myanmar citizenship in 1982, deprived of basic human rights, tortured, imprisoned and forced to flee their home province of Rakhine.
This is why there are tens of thousands of Rohingya living in squalid conditions in Bangladesh or struggling to survive in a number of countries from Malaysia to Saudi Arabia.
They have been described by the UN as one of the world’s most persecuted minorities. Simply put, the Rohingya are the victims of a slow genocide, to quote Nobel Laureate Prof Amartya Sen.
To condemn the violence of a minuscule fraction of the Rohingya without taking into account their massive marginalisation and severe oppression is a travesty of truth and justice.
It is extreme desperation and hopelessness that has forced some of them to resort to violence.
Of course, violence is not the solution.
It will not help to restore the rights of the Rohingya, especially their right to citizenship.
Our concern is that the violence will escalate.
The signs are already there. Given the underlying religious connotations of the conflict - though the conflict itself is not rooted in religion per se – it is not inconceivable that the violence will spread beyond Myanmar’s borders and engulf Muslim and Buddhist communities in other parts of South-East Asia.
This would be catastrophic for Asean, a regional grouping in which 42 percent of the population are Muslim and another 40 percent are Buddhist.
Finding workable solutions to the Myanmar-Rohingya conflict is therefore of utmost importance.
It is in this regard that the “Final Report of the Advisory Commission on Rakhine State” under the chairmanship of former UN secreta­ry-general Kofi Annan deserves the urgent attention of all stakeholders.
Announced in August 2017, the report calls for a review of the 1982 citizenship law and notes that “Myanmar harbours the largest community of stateless people in the world”, and urges the government to abolish distinctions between different types of citizens.
Other recommendations pertain to reduction of the poverty rate in Rakhine state which is 78 percent, improving the socio-economic condition of the people, enhancing access to health services and education, ensuring freedom of movement and encouraging people’s participation and representation.
Though the report is worded with a great deal of caution and diplomacy, it does send a clear message to the powers that be in Myanmar that the status quo cannot be allowed to persist.
That message is significant considering that the commission was actually initiated by the Myanmar government.
Will it take heed?
So far, there is no indication that it would respond positively to the recommendations, which is not surprising.
It is the harsh authoritarianism of the go­vernment embodied in the power of the military that is prima­rily responsible for the targeting of the Rohingya as the “ethnic other”, resulting in the genocide we are witnessing today.
Even if the Myanmar government does not act of its own volition, the Kofi Annan report can be used to persuade other governments to pressurise Myanmar to act. Apart from Asean governments, civil society groups and the media should also initiate special efforts to convince Beijing, Tokyo, New Delhi, Islamabad, Washington and London to demand that the Myanmar government protects all its citizens without discrimination.
If they fail to do so, these capitals should review their economic and/or military ties with Naypyidaw.
It is with the aim of persuading the leadership in Naypyidaw to change its behaviour that the Permanent People’s Tribunal is holding its concluding session in Kuala Lumpur on the treatment of the Rohingya, Kachins and other minorities in Myanmar from Sept 18 to 22.
As more voices plead for justice and compassion on behalf of the oppressed in Myanmar, they may eventually pierce the walls of Naypyidaw.

Dr Chandra Muzaffar,
President,
International Movement for a Just World (JUST)
Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia



Is it still the same old trickle-down effect
In the Philippines?
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 10 September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 7 September 2017

We are now a nation being challenged once more with several issues emanating from the present administration’s policies concerning its war on drugs and corruption. The latest word war among government officials - appointed and elected - has created more problems than solutions.
Filipinos are fed up with such bickering and endless “he said, she said” rhetoric in the midst of high prices of commodities and utilities that affect the daily life of an ordinary Juan dela Cruz.
Pundits are asking: “Where are the promises pertaining to a better life for every Filipino especially the poor?” Even middle-class families are slowly inching toward lower class status.
Are we seeing a repeat of the past administration’s promises that were never fulfilled, particularly the supposed positive economic results of foreign investments? Is it still the same “old trickle-down effect” or BS taking this country for a ride?
News of investments that will bring jobs via “build, build, build” seems to be stuck on the drawing board.
Some analysts observe that we are being herded (like cattle) into a debt trap.
Which is which?
Are we really moving toward industrialization, meaning more jobs, more buying power for the needy and more opportunities for growth?
President Duterte can possibly feel the heat this time.
Our peso is on a free fall, prices of commodities were compromised by bird flu hype, there is the ongoing Marawi crisis as well as the shocking control of top Chinese drug lords of our political system; even the Marcoses are attempting to dupe him of the fool’s gold and stale gold certificates to avert the global class suit the family will face soon.
President Duterte has been advised to implement a revolutionary government which will surely fail due to the infighting among his political party mates.
The President should think and act out of the box if he wants to survive this crisis by design.

Erick San Juan,
Manila,
Philippines



War on drugs in the Philippines
Is a fascist war on the poor
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 9 September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 7 September 2017

In response to the latest hogwash statement made by Rodrigo Duterte that the brutal murder of young innocent victims Kian Loyd delos Santos and Carl Angelo Arnaiz will not be the last, we say the war on drugs is in fact a fascist war against the poor and the youth.
Mr. Duterte said in his latest response to criticisms from the United Nations that a halt in the drug war will further imperil Filipinos, adding that this war is an existential struggle for the nation to “usher in real, lasting and meaningful change.”
We strongly condemn Mr. Duterte’s myopic and delusional obsession on the drug problem. We emphasize that this is not the root of the country’s social ills.
The mad President is putting the cart before the horse by thinking that drugs are the cause of poverty.
Mr. Duterte deviously uses such one-dimensional and outrageous description of Philippine society to rationalize the unjustifiable by calling for the senseless killing of more youths in his bloody drug war.
Following the death of Kian Loyd, the fascist US-Duterte dictatorship has again claimed the life of another youth, UP Diliman interior design student Carl Angelo. The unceasing spilling of blood ultimately points to the utter absurdity of the antidrug campaign which Mr. Duterte himself admitted will not be resolved by the end of his six-year term.
Bloodthirsty Mr. Duterte continually encourages the police to kill without due process while deceitfully shielding big capitalists and smugglers involved in various drug deals, even to the point of protecting his son, Davao Vice Mayor Paolo “Pulong” Duterte, who was linked to the drug-smuggling “Davao Group,” which is now at the center of a P6.4-billion shabu scandal.
We twit as absurd Mr. Duterte’s repeated insistence of drugs as the root problem of Philippine society. Imperialism, bureaucrat capitalism, and feudalism, which Mr. Duterte’s regime now willfully serves, are the real reason for the continuing exploitation and oppression of the Filipino people.

Vencer Crisostomo,
National chair,
Anakbayan,
Philippines

 


Call for drones to support
Forest management in Thailand
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 8 September 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post Wednesday 6 September 2017

Re: "Mangrove-planting drones ready for mission", Bangkok Post, Sunday 27 August 2017
Environmentalists should enthusiastically embrace modern technology - such as
drones - to support forest management.
At the same time, however, resource managers must not be blind to the real issues constraining forest conservation.
Drones and other high-tech tools are not "silver bullet" solutions to bypass the
difficult challenges of managing mangroves and other forest resources.
Mangroves have been severely depleted in Myanmar, Thailand and throughout
Southeast Asia, as investors have converted millions of hectares to fish and
shrimp ponds, local people have overused mangrove trees for fuelwood and
charcoal, and so-called development banks and organisations have perversely
encouraged expansion of rice production in mangrove-covered river deltas.
Undoubtedly, major efforts are needed to restore dwindling mangrove forests
wherever feasible. These endeavours could potentially include use of drones and
other technology, but unless the underlying causes of forest loss and
destruction are addressed, all the drones in the world will not result in
restored mangrove forests.

Samanea Saman,
Bangkok,
Thailand



Malaysian Muslims call on ASEAN
To stop violence against Rohingya Muslims
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 7 September 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Monday 4 September 2017

 

The current genocide of the Rohingya by Myanmar’s forces has captured global attention. Civil societies around the world are outraged by the daily images of the atrocities flooding mainstream and other media.
In a chilling report by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) dated Feb 3, mass gang rapes, slaughtering of babies and children, torture and inhumane treatment were detailed.
The past week has witnessed yet another wave of military crackdowns on the Rohingya in Myanmar’s Rakhine State, which has killed an estimated 3,000 civilians, while 10,000 homes and shops were razed to the ground, creating thousands of Internally Displaced Persons (IDP).
Forced to flee their homes to the nearest country, scores of Rohingya are now trapped between two countries and wanted by neither.
The devastating cruelty described by the UN as “very likely commission of crimes against humanity” follows a long-standing and systematic persecution of the Rohingya.
Decades of abuse, violations, discriminatory policies, exclusion and marginalisation have rendered them the most persecuted people in the world.
The deafening silence of Nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi and her government’s repeated refusal to allow the OHCHR unrestricted access to the worst affected areas of Rakhine bring into question her commitment towards human rights.
The Muslim Professionals Forum urges the Malaysian government to:
Urgently call upon Asean leaders to step up their efforts to ensure the government of Myanmar immediately stops the massacre and the grave human rights violations against the Rohingya, and to safeguard their safety and access to justice and reparations;
Call on the nation’s Asean neighbours to urge the UN to pressure the government of Myanmar to fully comply with the recommendations of Kofi Annan’s commission or face economic sanctions, regional and international isolation;
Call on the Asean community to stop the cycle of violence against the Rohingya and facilitate a sustainable, just and peaceful resolution to the humanitarian crisis;
In the interim, organise relief missions into Rakhine State to provide urgent medical and humanitarian aid to the victims; and,
Call on all Malaysians to extend their solidarity and assistance to Rohingya refugees, either directly or indirectly, through non-governmental organisations that have been supporting them regularly over the years.

Board of Directors,
Muslim Professionals Forum,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia


"An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth"
Says Philippine President Duterte
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 5 September 2017

President Duterte was quoted as saying “eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,” Exodus 21, 23-25, the “lex talionis” or the law of the talion.
He mischaracterized it as “the law of the jungle” “Duterte frowns on idea of reforming criminals,” News, 1 September 2017.
A very common misconception.
Before the lex talionis, the law of retaliation, the exchange rate was 7:1, even 77:1, not 1:1, in the time of Lamech in Genesis 4, 23-24. In effect: “You kill one of our tribesmen, we’ll kill seven, even 77, of yours.”
Lex talionis brought equivalence or parity, one eye for one eye, and was therefore a liberal progressive step.
Of course the new testament is suffused with lessons on love and charity; Jesus teaches us to forgive, to turn the other cheek, and to be kind and compassionate. We are not to give up on anyone but sadly, “Duterte frowns on idea of reforming criminals,” the same Inquirer article blares.
We attended the same law school but we simply seem fated never to understand each other on human rights addiction and the one thing we can ever be in life: to be kind.

R.A.V. Saguisag,
Palanan,
Makati City,
Philippines



Ferdinand Marcos hero status
Now the law of the land in the Philippines
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 5 September 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 30 August 2017

We have set Aug. 21 as a holiday to honor the martyrdom of Benigno “Ninoy” Aquino Jr. whose body rests in a private cemetery. It was his family’s self-effacing choice to bury him there among ordinary people for whose sake he sacrificed his life.
The wax? body of his tormentor - and the people’s - rests ingloriously in the Libingan ng mga Bayani.
Thanks to a Supreme Court beholden to the family of the late tyrant, Ferdinand E. Marcos has been virtually proclaimed a “hero!”
The Supreme Court has thus spoken it is now the “law of the land!”
Can an annual holiday to “honor” that stinking “hero” be farfetched?
And we now might want to rethink and erase that ridiculous saying etched in some monuments around the country: “The Filipino is worth dying for,” and replace it with an apt, more honest-to-goodness one: “The Filipinos are a crazy people,” or so the Supreme Court thinks!

Jeremias H Tobias,
Manila,
Philippines




Call for Malaysia to make education
More affordable
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 4 September 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Wednesday 30 August 2017

I write based on my experience of having being a school teacher, a university
lecturer and facilitator for thousands of executives here and abroad, spanning
35 years.
I refer to the debate on university education and unemployed graduates.
For as long as we are unable to admit our faults, but look for scapegoats or are
bent on keeping a safe distance from our paymasters, we are doomed.
We will never resolve our education predicament.
Firstly, parents are to be blamed.
They have competed with their neighbours to make sure they can announce that
their kids are in university.
To most Malaysians, getting enrolled in a university is the ultimate measure of
great parenthood, a mark of having brilliant children.
Many look down on themselves and others if the kids are going to pick up a trade
or skill upon finishing schooling.
To belong in this category is shameful and a mark of failure.
We fail to recognise that being purposeful in life and to society is the greater glory of civilisations.
Adults have come to peddle the notion that in order to survive in this world,
one must get into a university at whatever cost.
And so, throughout the schooling years, much is invested in tuition classes.
As long as we keep the private tuition industry thriving while schools hand over
this commitment to teach to tuition classes, we are to be blamed.
The argument may be one of wanting to make education more affordable or to
create enough room for the growing demand.
The fact is university education is becoming more expensive.
There is no university that is happy to just break even or operate at a loss.
Profits, expansions and grand facilities are all wrapped into a marketing
bundle.
Proclaiming excellence through glossy bro-chures and advertisements is
the order of the day.
Thirdly, let us be honest if we are serious about remedies that can work.
The quality of lecturers and faculty members is not something we can be proud
of.
I have encountered so many of them who have stopped reading even a book a year, let alone do research to boost their knowledge.
Getting by, doing routine tasks, was all that mattered.
It was this survival mantra that had taken root. Keeping your job and promotions mattered more.
And, the justification that prevailed was that the need to fulfil administrative
requirements, cramped teaching hours, preparing for examinations, plus marking
and grading, left hardly any time for them to read.
Fourthly, some students who enter universities are cut-and-paste material.
The majority of them can hardly write a two-page essay to demonstrate their
understanding, comprehension and thinking abilities.
Gone are the days where teachers were respected for their passion and pursuit of
knowledge and for being an authority on their subject. Gone, too, are the days
when teachers wrote well, read well and spoke well.
For as long as parents run the race with blinkers on, we will continue to suffer
this fate of unemployed graduates, unemployable graduates, misfit graduates,
declining standards of professionalism and acute shortage of skilled workers.
A lot needs to be done to see a change or set the education system back to its
glory days, where schools and universities were the hallmarks of excellent
education.

J. D. Lovrenciear,
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia

 


Call for Islamic mosques in Malaysia
To go green
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 3 September 2017
First Published in the New Straits Times, Wednesday 30 August 2017

Thank you, Dr Zorina Khalid, for your letter titled “Let fresh air flow through
our mosques”
in New Straits Times, August 25.
It was an excellent piece.
The points raised and suggestions are not only applicable to mosques but also to
schools, colleges, other places of worship, community health, hospitals and
private organisations.
Environmentally-sustainable architecture to maximise use of natural light,
ventilation and rainwater, besides recycling and reusing, are necessary to
manage global warming and human sustainability.
Therefore, incentives provided for installation of solar panels for generating
electricity and rain harvesting systems for water conservation should be promoted by the authorities.
I am a member of a mosque management committee and am also involved in other
organisations where I have been trying to persuade initiatives like installing
solar panels, which not only give free electricity and reduce costs, but also
obtain additional revenue through Tenaga Nasional Bhd.
Reducing air-conditioner usage, especially on cooler and rainy days, and opening
the windows for air are other initiatives I am working on.
However, I encounter apathy and disinterest among committee members in these
attempts.
Perhaps it is good if state Islamic departments institutionalise these ideas
into guidelines for mosques or surau.
The Education and Health Ministries should work on guidelines for schools,
learning institutions, and hospitals.
The impact of greening these organisations is immense for the community, country
and world.
Other countries may follow successful Malaysian initiatives in workable,
eco-friendly and sustainable ways.

A.S.M. Shariff,
Petaling Jaya,
Selangor,
Malaysia




Prison for former PM Yingluck Shinawatra
Likened to William Addis
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 20 September 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Thursday 31 August 2017

Re: "Yingluck's flight is no win-win deal", in Bangkok Post, Opinion, Wednesday August 30.
Soonruth Bunyamanee ably pinpoints the reality that fleeing a jail sentence
dooms political hopes. In contrast, being locked up is absolutely no barrier to promotion.
Ho Chi Minh, Hitler, Mandela, Stalin, Lenin, Gandhi, etc were all examples of eaders who had been in prison earlier in their careers.
Another incidental bonus of prison is that you might do something useful.
William Addis invented the toothbrush whilst in his cell and Cervantes managed to write the immortal novel Don Quixote.

Barry Kenyon,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 


Illegal foreign workers are flooding
The Malaysian labour market
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 1 September 2017
First published in the New Straits Times, Sunday 27 August 2017

Workers should be treated with fairness, dignity and equality without distinction, irrespective of whether they are locals or migrants.
All forms of exploitative and abusive practices against workers are prohibited by
international and domestic legislation.
Slavery and forced or compulsory labour is prohibited by the Federal Constitution and the Penal Code.
The growing pace of economic globalisation has seen a hike in the number of
foreign or migrant workers entering the country.
Malaysia has increasingly relied on them to address its labour shortages, especially in the manufacturing,
construction and plantation sectors.
Despite the trend, over the past year, to restrict the number of foreign workers
and hire local labourers, foreign workers continue to enter Malaysia in large
numbers.
Foreign workers hired legally are accorded equal treatment and have the same
working conditions as locals, in line with the United Nations Convention on the
Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families.
The primary objective of this convention is to foster respect for migrants’
human rights.
The Immigration Act provides, among other things, that the employment of a
foreign national must be upon the issuance of a valid employment permit.
The employment permit so issued is only valid in respect of the particular
employment and, further, the employer specified therein.
Unfortunately, illegal foreign workers are flooding the labour market and they
are posing greater risks to public safety and national security as some are
engaged in criminal activities.
In certain sectors, they are subjected to physical, verbal or psychological abuse.
Exploitation of illegal foreign workers is not uncommon.
Poor and hazardous working conditions, excessive and unreasonable demands, excessive working hours, inadequate rest days, non-payment or low wages, forced labour, child labour, sexual exploitation and verbal or physical abuse are some of the usual grouses of these workers.
These are often highlighted by the international media, which tarnishes the country’s image and creates tension between the host and the labour-supplying countries.
Hiring an illegal foreign worker or even harbouring such workers is an offence
under the Immigration Act.
If found guilty, the punishment is a fine of between RM10,000 and RM50,000.
Where it is proven that the person has, at the same time, harboured more than
five of such persons, that person shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of
not less than six months but not more than five years and shall also be liable
to caning of not more than six strokes.
This country has many illegal or undocumented foreign workers. Many refuse to
take up the government’s amnesty offers, which would lead to their repatriation
or legalisation, because unscrupulous employers keep hiring them.
Vigorous enforcement of the law is required and employers found guilty of hiring
illegal workers should be subjected to maximum fines, imprisonment and caning.
The proposal to raise the fine to RM100,000 and to impose caning for each
illegal foreign worker employed is commendable.
This will ensure that legally hired foreign workers do not violate the terms of
their contracts by absconding and discourage employers from hiring illegal
workers.

Professor Dr Ashgar Ali Ali Mohamed,
International Islamic University Malaysia
Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia





Former Thai PM Yingluck Shinawatra
Lives to fight another day
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 31 August 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 30 August 2017

Vint Chavala's response to the disappearance of Yingluck Shinawatra and his
disappointment, brings to mind the old adage: "He who fights and runs away,
lives to fight another day."

We still have to hear Ms Yingluck's side of the story, which I'm sure will give
us more of an insight, told from her new comfortable home than it would from an
overcrowded cell in the Bangkok women's prison. Can't wait.

Brian,
Bangkok.
Thaailand


War on drugs in the Philippines
At the cost of humanity
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 30 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 28 August 2017

(EJKs) lately, especially with regard to Kian Loyd delos Santos, reminds me of
what former president Benigno S. Aquino III was quoted to have said recently in
your paper that the phrase itself is a misnomer because the Philippines has no
death penalty so it has no “judicial killings.”
Therefore, there is no such thing as “extrajudicial killings,” only “murder” in “Drug killings are murders — Aquino,” Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 23 August 2017
This reminds me of what Australian lawyer Julian Burnside meant when he wrote
about “weasel words,” examples of which are “safe sex,” “therapeutic abortions,” “reproductive rights,” “compassionate release” for euthanasia, “enhanced interrogation techniques” for torture, etc.
A long dead Russian dictator once said that one death is a tragedy, but a
million is a statistic.
The number of those unlawfully killed may be over 10,000, with no end in sight.
People like Delos Santos and Danica May Garcia are not some anonymous faceless statistic nor “collateral damage.” They were once someone’s son, someone’s daughter.
Most of the perpetrators of Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge killing fields have yet to
face justice, but their victims’ remains are reminding the world of their crimes
against humanity.
Are we in a race to the bottom with the Khmer Rouge to eradicate the scourge of drugs?
We may do so only at the cost of our humanity and our souls, and will have to
live with that shame.
Rambo was no hero to me, but the TV detective Columbo was.

Walter Paul Komarnicki,
Manila,
Philippines



Christian missionaries in the Philippines
Condemn the war on drugs
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 29 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 25 August 2017

We, the Redemptorists of the Philippines composed of the vice-province of Manila and province of Cebu, express our outrage over the recent spate of killings in line with the government’s war on drugs.
As missionaries dedicated to serving the poor and the abandoned, we condemn the war on drugs as a war on the poor.
Most of the victims of extrajudicial killings are poor people.
The police have become more relentless as President Duterte himself had on many occasions incited the police to carry out a murderous war on the poor.
On the other hand, rich drug lords and coddlers of drug suppliers are given full
extent of due process; 6.4 billion-worth of shabu freely entered the country due
to connections of rich drug lords to politicians and Customs officials.
In all of these, there was no howl from the President and other high-ranking government officials.
As Christians, we are appalled by the utter loss of respect for the dignity of
life and human rights of the police operations.
We are utterly distressed that in a Christian country like ours, the killings are tolerated, even supported.
We dread the reality that a split-level kind of faith exists among our people.
Such faith sees no connection between the gospel values and the wellspring of
Christian faith, and the suffering and killing of the people.
As Filipinos we are gravely concerned with the kind of society we have become.
What kind of people have we become?
After more than a year of the war on drugs, our country has turned into a big killing field. Death is the order of the day.
A culture of killing with impunity is the new normal.
On the other hand, a culture of silence and a climate of fear prevail. In the midst of the daily killings, many people go on with their lives, show no empathy to the victims and accept the government’s war on drugs as a necessary evil.
Condemning the war on drugs does not undermine our stance against drugs. Even
before the Duterte administration, we have denounced the menace of drug
addiction in our proclamations and programs.
We did not just denounce, however; we also organized programs and services for victims of drugs like counseling, livelihood projects and community support mechanisms.
We call on the government to respect the law and uphold life.
We call on the government to stop the killings.
The “war on drugs” which in reality is a war on the poor has to end.
Now!
We call on the Church to defend the sanctity of life during these dangerous
times.
We call on all people of goodwill to assist the poor victims of the drug
war and participate in building programs to counteract the evil effects of drug
addiction.
Our Mother of Perpetual Help, pray for us that the spate of killings in our
country may come to an end!

Fr. Ariel Lubi, CSsR,
Vice-provincial superior,
Redemptorist Vice-Province of Manila,
Fr. Nio Perezico, CSsR, provincial superior,
Redemptorist
Province of Cebu,
Philippines




Abu Sayyaf accused of staging attacks in Zamboanga
To shift attention from Marawi
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 28 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 25 August 2017

It’s been a week since the public was bombarded with news on the alleged murder of Kian Loyd delos Santos by police forces.
To date, a humongous number of people have already reacted to the situation: journalists, politicians, concerned citizens, obnoxious trolls and netizens, religious groups, activists, Left-leaning congressmen and organizations—name it.
Yes, I would have to agree that Kian’s alleged murder by police forces is
deplorable, distressing, and shocking. However, I think there are also
other issues that equally deserve public knowledge, scrutiny, and exposure.
On August. 21, the Abu Sayyaf rioted over a quiet and peaceful village in Zamboanga
City, which resulted in the killing of nine unsuspecting villagers who were
preparing for their coming fiesta.
The Abu Sayyaf killed and mutilated one man, and wounded two minors (one is a 10-year-old youngster while the other is 9 years old), among others.
While the Abu Sayyaf has long been terrorizing Filipinos and destroying public
and private properties, its sudden and sporadic scourge raises great suspicion.
The possibility that the Abu Sayyaf stage such attacks in order to shift media,
as well as military and security forces’ focus from Marawi, deserves attention
and consideration.
If we, Filipinos, much more our politicians and other government officials, are
bothered and outraged by Kian’s alleged murder, with more reason that we should
all be more concerned and appalled by the ongoing terrorist attacks, which are
becoming more periodic and larger in scale.
Again, let us be reminded that the Maute group started by bombing a specific
area in Davao City in late 2016. The next thing we know, they already joined
forces with the Abu Sayyaf, got hold of Marawi, plundered said city into ruins,
and have been causing a number of casualties among government troops.
I believe the Abu Sayyaf attacks are giving us a premonition, something that we should now be heeding, given the insidious ways of this terrorist group and our recent experiences in Marawi.
Yes, Kian’s case deserves empathy and attention. But how about our terrorized
and violated brothers and sisters in Mindanao? Should they be left out?

Meynard Dasig,
Manila,
Philippines




The war on drugs in the Philippines
Is a war against the poor
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 27 August 2017
First Published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 25 August 2017

Stop peddling the lie that our streets our safer now.
If they were, many children who have been casualties of this drug war would still be alive now. The murder of 17-year-old Kian Loyd delos Santos is only the latest—we have at least 31 Filipinos aged 18 years and younger who are now dead because of police operations or vigilante-style killings.
They are not collateral damage—they are victims, as well.
This war on drugs, as we have already seen before, is a war against the poor, against those who do not have access to justice, and against our youth.
Safety isn’t just being able to walk alone at night without fear of being a victim of crime.
It is also in being able to do the same knowing that our law enforcers will be ready and able to protect you. Right now, one thing is clear:
We are far from being safe and secure.
In August 2016, two months after this new administration took office, I—together
with my colleagues Akbayan party-list Rep. Tom Villarin and Camarines Sur Rep.
Gabby Bordado—filed a resolution in the House of Representatives directing the
committee on justice to conduct an inquiry on the upsurge of extrajudicial
killings and summary executions that have occurred during that time.
Now, the numbers have risen.
More people—including children like Althea Barbon 4 years old, Danica May Garcia and Francis Mañosca (5 years old), San Niño Batucan 7 years old, and many others—have been killed.
One year after, our resolution has not been acted upon.
No hearings have been scheduled, no law enforcers have been called on to explain these incidents.
I once again call on my colleagues in Congress to investigate these cases and hold the perpetrators accountable.
We must stop the killings and reclaim our humanity. Huwag muling payagang umiral
ang dilim.

Rep. Kaka Bag-Ao,
Lone District,
Dinagat Islands,
Philippines


Call for Thai tourists
To stop vandalising the environment

The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 25 August 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Monday 21 August 2017

Re: "Tourism troubles", in Philippine Inqrer Sunday 20 August 2017
Khun Brian claims nothing was the matter with the stability around the hot pool
where Thai tourists trespassed.
He claims he is a geologist. Unfortunately this trespass, like most others in Yellowstone and other similar parks is not related to geology, but to ecology. There are notices in Khao Yai National Park
warning people not to steal wild orchids, but this does not help. Nearly 100 percent of visitors are Thais.
One of the tourists in Yellowstone was videoed crouching down collecting small
pebbles and tossing them into the pool.
There are areas in heritage sites worldwide, like the famous caves in Puerto Rico, where one is not permitted off the flagstone path, and visitors are cautioned not to touch the walls, or dip their fingers into the small pools and puddles of water because human bacteria could harm the stability of the water.
The size of a sign is meant not to mar the environment or vista, and is not
related to the intensity of the danger that can occur in a trespass.
A "Beware of Dog" notice on a fence does not have to be the size of a billboard to caution people.

Yellowstone Mango,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 

What to do with Bangkok's
Abandoned Lavalin Skytrain bridge
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 25 August 2017
First Published in the Bangkok Post, Thursday 24 August 2017

I'm baffled by the BMA's latest brainwave for using up their annual budget with
a proposed "Sky Park" on the abandoned Lavalin Skytrain bridge in Bangkok Post, August 19.
This is located between the two spans of the Phra Pok Klao Bridge, adjacent to
the Rama I Memorial Bridge.
Opened in 1984, the central span of the three-span structure was intended for a
mass-transit rail track with Lavalin of Canada slated to include this river crossing in a three-line city-wide network.
Since the Anand government cancelled the contract in 1992 this has been left derelict and inaccessible.
The BMA would spend 129 million baht on a 2,380 square metre garden which is less than 1.5 rai and equates to 54,200 baht per square metre!
Besides the inordinate cost, the noise and air pollution from six lanes of traffic whizzing by just some feet away on both sides would make for a most unhealthy destination.
The span is positioned well below the level of the two adjacent roadways so there are presently no river views.
The BMA plans "higher platforms" so visitors can enjoy these views but this will only expose people to even more pollution.
As the Post's aerial photo shows, both ends of the Phra Pok Klao and Rama I
Memorial Bridges features heavily wooded parks and gardens.
Some are closed to the public; others appear to be underutilised. I would suggest the BMA use just 10 percent of their budget on rehabilitating these existing parks and repairing the torn-up river promenade whilst making the area more accessible for walkers by building pedestrian underpasses.
But what to do with this abandoned bridge?
It could be covered with solar panels, or, just left as a monument to poor planning and lack of "negotiating skill" by Lavalin with the Thai authorities.
A brown information board could be placed at each end describing the history of this huge white elephant.

John L Sheppard,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 

The Philippines is the only country in the world
That does not allow divorce
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 24 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Saturday 19 August 2017

Is the Philippines the only country that doesn’t allow divorce?
According to some writers, it is.
There are countries with “no-fault divorce” and “fault divorce.”
No-fault divorce is filed by the petitioner without indicating that either the
petitioner or the other spouse is at fault.
Fault divorce, on the other hand, can be likened to the annulment of voidable marriage or declaration of nullity
of void marriage in the Philippines because the petitioner must specifically
cite the ground for the dissolution of marriage.
The ground or grounds must be proven.
In effect, the petitioner is blaming the other spouse.
The Philippines does not have fault divorce, but there is no need for it because
there is a counterpart. In annulment of voidable marriage or declaration of
nullity of void marriage, the petitioner blames the other spouse or someone else
for grounds enumerated in the Family Code of the Philippines.
If the ground for the declaration of nullity of void marriage is psychological incapacity, the petitioner is blaming himself/herself or the other spouse, or both.
For clarity, divorce advocates in the Philippines may say that what they want is a no-fault divorce.
Assuming that the Philippines is the only country without divorce, is it necessary for our country to follow the world?
Peter Wallace, who I admire since I met him years ago when he was guest speaker
at our school, said in his Like It Is column (“The only one,” Opinion, 8/10/17):
“The Philippines is the only country in the world that does not allow divorce.”
Well, not really. The Philippines has relative divorce (“Handbook on the Family
Code of the Philippines” by Alicia V. Sempio-Diy, reprinted in December 2006) or
legal separation. However, it only ends property relations and marital
obligations.

Leandro N. Opetina,
General secretary,
Circle of Advocates for Workers,
Quezon City,
Philippines





Call for Bangkok to adopt
The South Korean public bus system
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 23 August 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Saturday 19 August 2017

Re: "The ABCs of bad transport policy plans", in Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 10 August 2017.
I have lived in South Korea for the past two years.
When I arrived in the country, I was impressed with its clean and efficient public transportation system.
Its extensive subway system is world-renowned, but what is less known is
its excellent bus system.
Should Bangkok wish to adopt the public bus system from South Korea, it should do so according to its actual functions and implementations.
All buses are air-conditioned and installed with comfortable seats.
There are also clearly labelled seats designated for the elderly and disabled, which
occupy the front half of the bus.
At every bus stop there are clear map routes indicating the buses that pass through as well as their destinations, operating time, and frequency.
Crucially, South Korea employs the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) to
its buses.
At every bus stop, a small screen indicates precisely when your bus will arrive.
The real-time information is so accurate that commuters can even see when their bus has left the previous stop! Such reliability may be difficult in Thailand, where traffic is chronically bad.
The colour-coded scheme in South Korea is different from what has been adopted
in Bangkok.
The colours of the bus (and yes, the paint covers the entire body of the bus!) are not zone-designated as in Bangkok's case, but rather indicates the purpose and function of the bus.
Blue indicates a bus that runs regular, middle-range routes, and green for buses that run through smaller neighbourhoods and alleys or to mountainous suburban areas. Neither Korean nor Thai commuters need to know which bus colours operate in which zone of the city (north, south, east, west); hence, Bangkok's latest colour-scheme adaptation entirely misses the mark.
The South Korean government provides guide maps detailing all bus routes in the
form of booklets and online both in Korean and English, so locals and tourists
can easily access them. Most of the current information available online is in
Korean, although I have already seen some genuine efforts to increase
English-language access in the relevant applications.
Finally, paying for the bus fare is a breeze, since apart from the pre-paid
transportation card option, one can even use their bank debit card to pay for
both buses and subway rides!
Furthermore, buses run frequently and it is illegal for bus drivers to skip stops. Therefore, two-hour waiting times that have been mentioned among Thai commuters is unheard of here.

Vee Chansa-Ngavej
PhD candidate at Sogang University
Seoul,
South Korea






Call for examination of whether the beliefs
Of the majority should reign supreme over others
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 22 August 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Saturday 19 August 2017

In her August 18 comment, Khun Paritta Wangkiat opined that "it is important for us to start asking why we think established values or beliefs of the majority
should reign supreme over others. It's clear we must urgently examine our
society and its structural problems".

If you wish to live in a democratic society then the majority view prevails subject to some protection of minority rights.
Is it society that is at fault or our practice of democracy?
All too often we see that democracy is just a fig leaf to allow powerful groups (our "superiors") to serve their own ends and interests.
The parties in the US, UK or Thailand are just as self serving as Vladimir Putin, or the Communist Party of China.
What we should urgently examine is how we can make democracy work better. Our elected "superiors" are part of the problem.
Democracies around the world are failing to deliver because we have lost sight
of three things in my view.
First that elected members are supposed to be representatives of their constituents first and party members second.
Too often they are just party rubber stampers, not much different to delegates to the party congress in China.
When was the last time we saw a rebellion against the party whip in Thailand?
We must return to electing proper representatives not party hacks.
Second, the politicians chosen either as representatives or members of the
executive must be honest and govern with integrity.
Nobody believes politicians any more because they lie and mislead so often.
This integrity must extend to being realistic about what is affordable and possible when putting forwards policies.
Populism is a form of dishonesty because it pretends there are no limits to government largesse and resources.
An honest politician has to say no to or at least prioritise the wishes of the people when making policy promises.
We need a different quality of politician. But who elects the politicians and
falls for their populist promises time and again?
The voters are the essential third part of this story.
All sides have conspired to leave voters feeling disconnected from their politicians and the results of their vote.
It is nothing to do with coups, but because all of the parties actually have been dishonest in their promises and none have actually followed the principle of government of the people, for the people, by the people when in power.
The core structural change that needs to occur is for voters to take up their
responsibility to assess and select representatives and leaders to govern in the
interests of the country and all its people, rather than in their own narrow
self interest.
The media has a vital role to educate and inform the citizenry about this important task and the vital need to perform it thoughtfully and wisely.
If we want a different outcome we must make different choices at the
forthcoming election regarding both the qualities of our representatives and how
they will govern.

P Jackson,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 

Former President Ferdinand Marcos is a hero
Says final Supreme Court ruling
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 21 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer Saturday 19 August 2017

In its final ruling on the matter, the current Supreme Court said former president Ferdinand E. Marcos “possessed all the qualifications to be interred in the Libingan ng mga Bayani being a former president and commander in chief, a legislator, secretary of national defense, a military personnel, a veteran, and a Medal of Valor awardee” “Marcos to remain buried at Libingan, Surpreme Court rules with finality,” in Philippine Inquirer 8 August 2017.
In a word, he deserved to be called “bayani”a “hero”!
The previous Supreme Court saw Marcos as rotten to the core and deserved to be
kicked out of the country in 1986 after his family’s 20-year regime of plunder
and pillage.
Numerous decisions came out of that Court denouncing the late dictator for having committed every corrupt act and practice in the book “Supreme Court on Marcos,” Opinion, Artemio Panganiban, 16 April 2017.
With this latest ruling of the current Supreme Court, past rulings have amounted
to nothing more than total nonsense!
Clearly, in those hallowed halls of “justice,” it is still “weather-weather lang!”
And those magistrates have the gall to think they have the wisdom to preside over the lives and fortunes of the entire Filipino people?
For shame!

Marites Dela Merced,
Manila,
Philippines


 

It is no joke
Being the wife of a Philipine soldier
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 20 August 2017
First published in the Pilippine Inquirer, Saturday 12 August 2017

I want to share my thoughts and feelings as a wife of a soldier through this letter. I hope this can serve as an inspiration to other people.
To this day, I do not know when exactly the Marawi siege began.
I tend to not count the days because it will hurt me more.
This war is like a nightmare because a lot of soldiers are sacrificing their lives to save innocent people and free Marawi from the hands of evil.
A war that once again deprived me to be with my husband.
It hurts me so much knowing the hardships my husband and his fellow soldiers are facing until now.
To my husband, I know your body aches because of the strenuous battle and
carrying those heavy rifles.
I feel very nervous when you tell me that you almost got hit by a sniper’s bullet and toppled by a steel bar because of the intensity of the airstrike.
But you still manage to smile and laugh because you do not want me to worry.
My conscience bothers me when you only drink coffee as your breakfast and eat a small packed meal that I know is not sufficient.
I cannot sleep and eat well when a day passes that you were unable to give me a
call because you were on the move.
You know how much it gives me relief when my phone rings and it flashes your name.
Whenever you call, I answer you with a happy and lively tone but deep inside, I am lonely, nervous, and frightened.
But I must be strong so that you will also be strong to fight the enemies.
I should not be lonely so that you will not worry.
It is hard living without you all the time and waiting for you with uncertainty.
It is hard waking up without you by my side.
It is hard seeing you endure all the pain and hardships and I cannot comfort you when you need me.
I can only offer prayers for your safety.
Stay strong for me and do not lose hope.
I am always here and waiting for you.
It is no joke being the wife of a soldier, including all the challenges we face
whenever our husbands are assigned to far-flung places and dangerous missions.
Despite all these, I am very proud of him and I understand what he has pledged
to the country.
I only hope that this war will end and he will come back home to be with us again.
We are very lucky that we have them and we are grateful that Filipinos
appreciate their efforts.
From the day I married a soldier, I know that part of him belongs to our country.
He is not only my hero and lifesaver.
He is also a hero and lifesaver to many Filipinos.

Precious S,
Manila,
Philippines




Call for private ambulance
To install emergency equipment
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 19 August 2017
First published in the Star, Friday 11 August 2017

I have been a regular patient at Universiti Malaya Hospital since 2012.
While waiting for my appointment, I have noticed private ambulances bringing patients to the hospital’s emergency section.
The ambulances are very colourful and the personnel wear very bright uniforms.
I was taken to the hospital’s emergency department once in 2014 in a private
ambulance (called by a maternity doctor) after I suffered a heart attack while
having breakfast at a food court in Subang Jaya.
That particular ambulance was manned by a male driver and a lady assistant who
sat with me.
As there was no medical equipment in the ambulance, I did not receive any medical attention.
However, the lady asked me to pay RM250 for the use of the ambulance while en
route to the hospital.
I was shocked but had no choice as she had a receipt in her hand and was waiting for the cash.
Are these ambulances legal and approved by the Health Ministry?
Are their personnel medically qualified to render assistance to the patients they are
ferrying to the hospital?
Shouldn’t the ambulances carry at least vital equipment such as oxygen tank and blood pressure kits?
Shouldn’t the personnel (at least the one sitting with the patient) be a medically qualified person?
Could the Health Ministry or any other authority clarify the above?
If the answer is in the negative, could they explain why no positive steps are being
taken to ensure the safety of patients travelling in those ambulances?
As precaution is better than cure, shouldn’t the problems be nipped in the bud?
There is no use forming a task force to investigate the matter only after a
tragedy has happened.
The only benefit to the patient is the speedy transport to the hospital as the
ambulances use a siren.

Lawrence Lang,
Subang Jaya,
Malaysia


 

Philippine hospitals call on President Rodrigo
For release of humanitarian aid
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 18 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 11 August 2017

Your Excellency, President Rodrigo Duterte: First, we wish to thank your administration for finally facilitating the release of hospital equipment and supplies donated to Department of Health-affiliated Adela Serra Ty Memorial Medical Center (ASTMMC) in Tandag, Surigao del Sur.
This arrived in April 2015, and impounded by Customs for 18 months.
A second donation to Southern Philippines Medical Center, Davao City, is reportedly still unreleased.
The donor is Virginia-based Montero Medical Mission (MMM), led by Dr. Juan Montero, MD.
But Dr. Montero still has a problem.
Customs wants the government-affiliated ASTMMC to pay a staggering P1.2 million in fees and charges.
This ballooned from P559,435.69 as of May 2016.
The increase was partly due to delays in Customs processing, courier service, etc., leading to compounding penalties, until it was ridiculously considered abandoned by Customs for nonpayment of fees that the hospital and donor could no longer afford to pay.
In frustration, Dr. Montero abandoned the hopeless Davao City case but pursued
the Tandag case because the donation included P17.5 million worth of prosthesis
equipment which would benefit thousands of poor paraplegics.
It is unfortunate that humanitarian donations for poor Filipinos are held at bay
by government fees and charges.
The Montero case is actually the tip of the iceberg.
Many donations from US-based Filipino doctors, who want to give back to
their countrymen, suffer the same fate.
The government has a mandate to help the poor, than to make more money for itself at the expense of the poor.
Please, Mr. President, pakiusap para sa mahihirap na makikinabang (a favor for beneficiaries who are poor).
We appeal to you to have the Tandag and Davao City donations
released at once.
We also appeal to you to come up with an Executive Order freeing future humanitarian donations from charges and Customs red tape.

Bernie V. Lopez,
Manila,
Philippines

 

Call for free, fair and safe elections
In Papua New Guinea
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 17 August 2017
First published in the National, Friday 11 August 2017

I am a simple farmer and my understanding of democracy is that I have the
freedom to do whatever I wish in compliance with the laws of the country.
If democracy is for me, why were my family and I, tribesmen, and the people of
my beautiful Tolu council wards deprived of our constitutional right to vote for
the leaders of our choice?
Our ballot boxes were allegedly taken into Kerowil, Singirok Barracks, where
voting took place under the watch of security officials.
An amateur footage showed what happened.
Isn’t that enough evidence for Electoral Commissioner Patilias Gamato to allow
the six disputed boxes to be counted again?
My family and I did not vote in this election because we were intimidated and
threatened not to enter the polling station.
Is this what we call a free, fair and safe election?

John Karapka
Tolu 2 council ward, North Waghi district
Jiwaka
Papua New Guinea



First Philippine Industrial Park (FPIP)
Rejects accusation of discrimination
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 16 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 11 August 2017

This is in reference to Daxim Lucas’ Biz Buzz article titled “Yellow discrimination?in Philippine Inquirer Business, 7 August, wherein he alluded to First Philippine Industrial Park’s (FPIP) predisposition toward Japanese locators at the expense of Chinese locators.
FPIP was established in 1996, and since then has remained true to its vision to
provide a world-class manufacturing environment in the Philippines to:
1) attract foreign investment; 2) generate export revenue; and 3) create jobs.
In line with this vision, FPIP has consistently taken action to ensure that park
productivity is maximized.
It is for this reason that FPIP strictly adheres to a policy of selling property in the industrial park only to end-users.
In line with this policy, we have, on occasion, bought back property from locators who have decided to scale down or close down operations. This was the case in 2009 when Fujitsu approached FPIP regarding its intention to sell its property. FPIP bought the property back from Fujitsu in September 2009 after months of
negotiation.
Since 2009, we have welcomed 67 new locators to FPIP. Of the 67 locators, 25
locators (37 percent) are non-Japanese.
Of the 25 non-Japanese locators, five (20 percent) are Chinese or Taiwanese.
This is proof that FPIP welcomes legitimate locators to its industrial park,
regardless of their nationality.
FPIP’s shareholders, First Philippine Holdings and Sumitomo Corporation of
Japan, value fairness and conduct business with the highest integrity.
We would never condone acts of discrimination based on race, creed, religion, age or sex.
We hope this helps clarify the matter.

Ferdinand Edwin S. Coseteng,
President,
First Philippine Industrial Park,
Manila,
Philippines




Call for ASEAN to support peace process
In Philippines, Myanmar and southern Thailand
The Southeast Asian Times, Tueaday 15 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 11 August 2017

The Initiatives for International Dialogue together with its allied networks—the Asia-Pacific Solidarity Coalition and the Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed Conflict-Southeast Asia, and the broad civil society movement in the region—urgently calls on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) to
put front and center issues on peace and human security that continue to
challenge regional stability and affect the lives of the most vulnerable peoples
in the region.
We view Asean’s 50th anniversary—marked last Aug. 8—as an opportunity to once again remind governments of their paramount duties and obligations to their
peoples. We believe that recent efforts by member states toward regional
cooperation must seek to pursue and explore initiatives that will
institutionalize mechanisms for sustainable peace, social justice and
development, and a transparent and fully consultative civil society
participation in the regional mechanism with the interest of the people at its
core.
We believe that serious challenges to peace and human security issues are
embedded in the inability and inaction of most governments to address the roots
of internal armed conflicts arising from assertions of the right to
self-determination, ethnic struggles for autonomy, political unrest, violent
radicalism and the rise of terrorism, disputes over cross-border territorial and
maritime issues, militarization and the protection of human rights and
fundamental freedoms, among others. In resolving these conflicts, we reaffirm
that the primacy of democratic processes over military or strong-arm solutions
must prevail.
Unfortunately, the most vulnerable and marginalized peoples of the
region continue to bear the brunt and suffer the scourge of all these conflicts.
More concretely, we urge Asean to ensure utmost support to formal and informal
peace processes in the region particularly in the Philippines, Myanmar and south
Thailand. Asean member governments must strengthen their preventive diplomacy to
address comprehensive peace and human security issues and social impacts of
recurring conflicts by establishing partnerships especially with civil society
movements and communities that are directly affected. This is so it can
demonstrate its commitment to a comprehensive security agenda as stated in the
Asean political-security blueprint.
We salute the peoples of Asean in their persistent and valiant assertions,
struggles and engagements to achieve peace, justice, democracy and
self-determination. We particularly note and remember that this year’s 50th
anniversary is also the 29th anniversary of the Burmese student-led uprising
against military rule under Gen. Ne Win. This revolt, popularly known as
“8-8-88,” was quickly and brutally suppressed. But the fight continues and we
will continue to celebrate this struggle that sparked and inspired the
resistance to authoritarian rule in Myanmar and around the region.
With this year’s summit also highlighting disputes in the West Philippine Sea,
we urge that these should be resolved by peaceful means in accordance with international law, including the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea.
“Partnering for Change, Engaging the World” is the theme commemorating Asean’s five decades of existence. As it has consistently proven since its inception,
Asean has a remarkable acumen in crafting catchy slogans every year.
The problem, however, lies in its failure to transform those catchphrases into
reality and breathe sincerity to these commitments.
Asean must now realize that an inclusive and sustainable regional peace and
security cannot be possibly achieved if it remains detached and indifferent from
the realities on the ground.
The regional bloc’s vision of a people-centered and peaceful Asean will remain illusory without putting the genuine peace and security of the peoples of the region at the forefront of the Asean vision.

Gus Miclat,
Executive director,
Initiatives for International Dialogue,
Manila,
Philippines




Thailand
Has key role in ASEAN
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 14 August 2017
First pubished in the Bangkok Post, Thursday 10 August 2017

Re: "Time for Thailand to step in and lead Asean (again)," in Bangkok Post August 7.
Asean cannot be thought of as a separate entity from Thailand given the
diplomatic contribution the country has made up until now and its key role in
the foundation, consolidation and transformation of the group.
In the future, Thailand will have the opportunity to further contribute to the
strengthening of Asean by promoting and developing the bloc.
Asean diplomacy is an essential component of global diplomacy in dealing with a
raft of complex issues such as those affecting our planet.
Thai diplomacy has the capacity to build bridges between the region and the rest
of the world.

Ioan Voicu,
Bangkok,
Thailand



Lumads have been effectively vilified
As enemies of the Philippine State
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 13 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 9 August 2017

As the country celebrates National Indigenous Peoples’ Day on August 9, it is saddening that indigenous peoples remain to be maligned and largely misunderstood.
With President Duterte announcing in his press conference after his second State of the Nation Address that he will “bomb” lumad schools for espousing communist ideals, lumad have been effectively vilified as enemies of the State.
The diverse indigenous peoples in Mindanao, collectively known as lumad, are by
nature peace-loving.
What they yearn for is recognition and protection of their rights to their ancestral domain and lands, as well as basic services coming from the government.
For several decades, however, they have been caught in the crossfire between the military and the New People’s Army (NPA) and Bangsamoro rebels.
More than that, their ancestral domains (similar to other indigenous peoples in the country) have also been plundered by logging and mining companies.
This has resulted in the lumad’s displacement from their lands and the loss of their livelihood.
Worse, it has led to the steady decay of their culture and identity.
The greater lumad population are the victims.
The belligerence of some of them are mere reactions to the historical oppression that they have experienced in the hands of the government and military, mining and logging companies, and various rebel groups.
The President’s threat to bomb lumad and their schools simply does not help uplift their lives as it doubles the victimization of these people.
Their vilification not only unfairly depicts them but it solidifies the reason for mainstream society to continue discriminating against them.
Worse, it even feeds into the rhetoric of the NPA, proving the insensitivity of the
government.
Dealing with lumad and other indigenous peoples requires recognition and
acceptance of their historical and continued oppression.
It also requires placing them at the forefront of the government’s redistributive agenda for basic services.
These courses of action allow the government to focus on the cause of the problem and not simply address the symptoms of their belligerence.
This is clearly the better approach compared to the fear-inducing rhetoric
against the lumad that unwittingly depict them as the problem that should be
blasted.

Raymond Marvic Baguilat,
Law reform specialist,
The University of the Philippines Law Center-Institute of Human Rights,
Manila,
Philippines

 



Would an Asean member country
Follow Thailand's example?
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 12 August 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 9 August 2017

Re: "Time for Thailand to step in and lead Asean (again)", in Bangkok Post Monday 7 August 2017
In present circumstances, the historical events about Asean are not the best way
to forecast the future. The only viable data about social change in Thailand
pertains to military coups. Hence, it is quite impossible for Thailand to be a
good leader or a role model? as the region faces growing dangers of internal
strife, religious radicalisation and the struggle between the forces of
democratisation and authoritarianism. A governance model based on a bad
combination of fear and servitude cannot be a leading light for Asean.
Would any Asean member like to follow Thailand's example? As they say, quality
of governance in any country cannot exceed the quality of its leaders. We see a
similar leadership crisis in the US, Europe and many other parts of the world.
?Although all politics is local, being a regional or world leader requires more
than coups?.

Kuldeep Nagi,
Bangkok,
Thailand

 

Call for investigation into murder
Of two journalists in the Philippines
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 11 August 2017
First published in The Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 9 August 2017

The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) condemns the murder of two journalists in Zamboanga del Sur and Sultan Kudarat provinces.
The NUJP calls for an immediate investigation on the separate killings of Rudy
Alicaway and Leo Diaz and demand the identification, arrest and prosecution of
those involved.
Two men riding tandem gunned down Alicaway while he was on his way home last
August 6 in Molave town in Zamboanga del Sur province.
The gunmen finished off Alicaway as he tried to crawl away after being shot, according to a report in the Inquirer (“Radyo ng Bayan anchor gunned down in Zamboanga del Sur,” Inquirer.net, 8/7/17).
Alicaway, 46, was a radio anchor of Tigmo-Tigmo program at dxPB 106.9 (Radyo ng Bayan Molave).
He was reportedly also a village councilman of Miligan in Molave.
Last August. 7, a motorcycle-riding gunman shot Leodoro Diaz after leaving his
house in President Quirino town in Sultan Kudarat province.
He died from multiple gunshot wounds.
Diaz was a columnist of Sapol Newspaper and a reporter of Radio Mindanao Network.
Their deaths, if work-related, bring to a total of 177 the number of Filipino
media workers killed since 1986.
The killings happened in two provinces of Mindanao even as the whole region is
under martial law.
This again highlights the culture of impunity in the attacks against and killings of Filipino journalists that have remained unabated despite an international outcry.

Dabet Panelo,
Secretary general,
National Union of Journalists of the Philippines,
Manila,
Philppines



Call for closer look at killings
In southern Thailand
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 10 August 2017
First publishedin the Bangkok Post, Tuesday 25 July 2017

Violence has for years gripped the entire region of Thailand's far South.
It is sad that the Thai media and civil society have not done enough to take a little
closer look into the killings and murders of civilians.
There is a real need to go beyond the normal of "what, when, where and how" but little into the "why".
The media has been to quick to take up explanations from Thai government security officials, as if they are honest brokers or innocent stakeholders in the matter.
Sadly, no one is posing tough questions as to why Malay suspects have been killed in questionable circumstances as if their constitutional rights don't matter. Meanwhile, the state wants people to have faith in the justice system.
Take the recent shooting death of Paoyee Tasamoh, 45, for example.
He was detained on Friday, July 14 at the back of his residence in Pattani's tambon
Paka Harang of Muang district while being escorted by a group of security
officials to an area where separatist militants had supposedly buried their
weapons.
His wife stood and watched him helplessly as they escorted him to the wooded area where he was shot dead. The official explanation said Paoyee had picked up a weapon, shot at them and fled. They said they had no choice but to kill him.
Similarly, on March 29 in Narathiwat's Rueso district, two ethnic Malays were
shot dead after security officials separated them from their 15-year-old niece,
who was driven away.
She insisted the two suspect s weren't armed when the authorities escorted them out of the car the three were travelling in.
In the end, it was her word against the authorities'. Imagine if these had happened in
other regions of the country.
How would the people react?
If the government wants the Malays of the South to have faith in the law of the land, the same rights and the rule of law (applied elsewhere in the country) must be applicable in the deep South.

Arfan Wattana,
Former director of advocacy for Permas,
The Patani Students’ Federation representing Melayu Muslim students in Thailand,
Bangkok,
Thailand




Phillipine government offficials
Worth millions of pesos
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 9 August 2017
First Published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 7 August 2017

President Duterte has signed an executive order canceling “excessive pays and bonuses” of government-owned or - controlled corporations.
That was long overdue.
Whoever said public service is such a thankless job was quite right - who needs gratitude if there is so much to loot?
The common justification or excuse for the astronomical salaries, allowances and
bonuses given high government officials is the need to attract the best minds to
do public service.
Without such “perks” and “incentives,” it seems the message is, public service can go hang!
Based on the Commission on Audit’s “Report of Salaries and Allowances” for 2016,
The most obscene pay went to then Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor Amando
Tetangco Jr. (P15.9 million), followed by now Governor Nestor Espenilla Jr.
(P12.28 million), and deputy governors Diwa Guinigundo (P12.24 million) and
Vicente Aquino (P12.14 million).
Easily, each of them was receiving at least P1 million per month! Multiply that by the countless public “servants” helping themselves to amounts just slightly lesser, we are looking at billions of pesos of taxpayer money bloating personal bank accounts while the nation teeters on the brink of bankruptcy!
Incidentally, those BSP officials must have really done a terrific job in keeping things in the banking system copacetic, or in excellent order, to deserve such mind-blowing compensation.
And lest it be forgotten, bank depositors all over the country must also really feel they owe it to those
nabobs of the banking system for all the gains they have been enjoying with
their hard-earned money deposited in banks to earn whopping interests at the
rate of less than 1 percent per annum!
Yet, the Supreme Court has been saying the “legal rate of interest” in this country is 6 percent per annum, so go figure!
But the thing is, many high officials in government have reported net worth in
the tens or hundreds of millions of pesos.
In other words, they are already so filthy rich what do they need to be paid so much for from the sweat and blood of taxpayers?
Can President Duterte not cajole them into doing “missionary work” for once to tide this country over a multitude of financial difficulties he has to deal with in the next five years of his term?
President Duterte is presently grappling with the dilemma of how and where to
find the funds for the rehabilitation of Marawi City now in utter ruins, his
election promise of free tuition in state universities and colleges, among a
myriad of other MMonetary woes.
Sadly, his multimillionaire-friends in the administration do not seem to care, much less share his vision and mission, as they continue to rake it in. The President, their boss, receives under P100,000 per month in salary. Is there no one in “public service” ashamed of receiving more?

Stephen L Monsanto,
Loyola Heights,
Quezon City,
Phiilippines




Philippine educators alarmed
At order to bomb Lumad schools
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 8 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 7 August 2017

We, members of the Educators’ Forum for Development, are alarmed at President Duterte’s order to “bomb lumad schools.”
The administration also staunchly defends the extension of martial law in Mindanao which has further disrupted Lumad schools. The safety of the lumad schoolchildren will only be secured with the immediate withdrawal of the military from community
schools and an end to aerial bombardments on the island.
The Lumad of Mindanao have overcome the absence of educational facilities in
their communities by setting up hundreds of schools with the help of charitable
institutions, devoted educators, and missionaries.
Contrary to the President’s misinformed description that they operate illegally, most of these schools have earned official recognition from the Department of Education, while the rest continue to hurdle toward getting the official stamp.
Through volunteers and licensed teachers, some of whom hail from the country’s
premiere universities, Lumad schools teach not only science, math, English,
Filipino and social studies, but culture and agriculture.
They aim to mold Filipino citizens who are not only knowledgeable but also socially conscious and responsible, and who value their indigenous heritage and harness their agricultural empowerment toward nation-building.
The government’s militarism is undermining these initiatives.
Even prior to the declaration of martial law in Mindanao, Lumad teachers and students have been victimized by counterinsurgency campaigns.
They are vilified, forced to evacuate their communities, and their school authorities and community leaders are killed without judicial process. Since the declaration of martial law, government has closed 20 Lumad schools, while instances of military occupation, killings, threats, harassment and intimidation, destruction of property, indiscriminate firing, filing of trumped-up charges, enforced disappearances, and torture have heightened. Last week, three Lumad school teachers who were among the protesters during Congress’ joint session on the extension of martial law were illegally detained.
The government has the responsibility to uphold, protect and promote the right
to education, particularly of underserved sectors such as indigenous children.
We call on the President to order his troops to vacate and stop aiming their
guns and bombs at community schools and premises.
Ending the militarization of Lumad communities is an immediate doable step that the Duterte administration can take to help indigenous groups in Mindanao reclaim their lives and continue their learning.
We also join calls for an end to martial law in Mindanao that has already displaced and disrupted the lives and livelihood of hundreds of thousands

Ninia Dela Cruz,
Secretary general,
Educators Forum for Development,
Manila,
Philippines

 

 

Call for Supreme Court to determine parameters
For future grant of bail and other court privileges
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 7 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 2 August 2017

It is worth looking back at previous Supreme Court resolutions: one, allowing hospital arrest to a former president on ground of poor health in a case where she was later on exonerated on demurrer and the other, granting bail to a senator on humanitarian consideration, a ground which was not even invoked by him in his bail petition.
Immediately after her release, the former president went business-as-usual as a
member of the House of Representatives without the telltale signs of one
suffering from an alleged serious neck ailment who went through the rigors of
years of incarceration.
For his part, the senator who is now enjoying temporary freedom by virtue of the
bail granted went the same route: discharging his duties and responsibilities as
a member of the Senate without exhibiting any sign of an old and sickly
nonagenarian.
He was even seen lawyering for Imee Marcos during one congressional hearing. No doubt, he is hale and hearty.
Will not those personal circumstances merit a second hard look by the Supreme
Court to enable it to determine with a decent degree of precision the parameters
of any future grant of bail and other court privileges?

Benjie Guerrero,
Business Center,
Sulo Riviera,
Diliman,
Quezon City,
Philippines

 

 

Call for Philippine President
To recognize and support Lumad schools
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 6 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 3 August 2017

Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people…” —Isaiah 10:1-2
We, the Rural Missionaries of the Philippines (RMP), a mission partner of the
Association of Major Religious Superiors in the Philippines (AMRSP), condemn
President Duterte’s threat to bomb Lumad schools and demand that he revoke his
statement.
Tribal schools in Mindanao were initiated by various religious institutions and
nongovernment organizations and operate with the help of the community members
themselves.
It is an effort to reach those communities too far away from regular schools.
The President’s statement is more than just bullying.
It is a legitimate threat to the lives of Lumad students, parents and volunteer teachers.
The government has failed to give services to these communities. Instead of vilifying them, President Duterte should recognize and support these schools for through them, Lumad children have gained access to education that the government has failed to provide.
Despite accusations that they are training Lumad children to be rebels, these
tribal schools are part of the Philippine education system’s Alternative
Learning System (ALS) and are by no means illegal. Some of them have been
granted permits by the Department of Education; others are denied permits, not
because they lack the requirements, but as part of continued attacks on
indigenous peoples’ rights.
We join many other organizations in demanding that President Duterte retract
this threat and call on Church people and the religious community to do so as
well.
Spare Lumad schools! Stop the militarization of rural communities!

Elen Belardo,
Rgs, Francis Anover,
Rsm, Agnes Mesina,
Sr, Lily Salilin,
Msm, Merlita Rodilfo,
Msm, Auleen Villarosa, Evelyn Urbiztondo,
Marcel Salem
Manila,
Philippines

 

 

US-Duterte regime
Is taking the anti-Lumad people road
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 5 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 3 August 2017

It’s logical.
If the Philippine president himself threatens to bomb a school of indigenous peoples
(IP), where else can we run to?
These self-help schools were built by the bare hands of the Lumad people because
there were no schools in their communities.
The schools such as Alcadev in Lianga, Surigao del Sur, whose executive director Emerito Samarca was killed with Lumad leaders Juvelio Sinzo and Dionel Campos in 2015, were expressions of Lumad people’s hunger for genuine development while preserving their culture of collectivism and care for environment.
It is a way of the Lumad elders to secure the future of their next generations and equip the youth to protect their ancestral lands from corporate plunder and land grabbing.
The US-Duterte regime is now taking the anti-people road.
This road will eventually lead him to accountability unless he makes a turn left, the road to just and lasting peace through the National Democratic Front of the
Philippines-GRP peace talks, and make radical changes in his policies which will
address basic problems of the Filipino people.
Instead, President Duterte bullied us indigenous peoples and Moro who joined the
people’s protest during his State of the Nation Address by saying “Umuwi na
kayo.”
We came all the way from Mindanao to call for a stop to the all-out war,
martial law and bombing of our communities.
Thousands have evacuated due to threat of bombings and human rights violations of military and paramilitary groups.
And we were bullied by no less than the President.
Our situation as national minorities is already worse as it is.
The Maranao people continue to suffer in evacuation centers as the Armed Forces of the Philippines refuses to end the firefight to justify the extension of martial
law.
The IP are still facing the wrath of the all-out war through intensified military operations in communities.
Political killings against national minorities continue with 21 victims under the Duterte regime.
With President Duterte’s threat to bomb Lumad schools, violence is encouraged
against Lumad and Moro.
If the schools were destroyed, so is our future.
Essentially, it is to destroy our race.
If so, we are left with no choice but to resist.

Jerome Succor ABA,
Cochair,
Sandugo,
Philippines


 

Federation in the Philippines
Depends on local government
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 4 August 2017
First Published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 2 August 2017

I listened to the second State of the Nation Address of President Duterte and I did not hear in his speech any proposed plan, program or specific executive instruction that the local government units (LGUs) have a vital role to play in realizing the
national goals set by the President.
I find it strange that the President, a former city mayor himself, never mentioned LGUs in his speech. It must be stressed that most of the national programs are primarily initiated at the LGU level. Simply put, LGUs provide action to national plans and programs.
However, it should also be understood that LGUs are not simply machines for
delivering services of the national government but are expressions of empowered
local entities which are capable of independent and sustaining growth and hence
have the right to determine their own fate.
I hope LGUs would get more attention from the national government especially so
that the latter is pushing for the adoption of a federal or a unitary form of
government and such an initiative largely depends on the nod of the LGUs.

Reginald B. Tamayo,
Marikina City.
Philippines

 

 

Call for Philippine President Duterte
To uphold mining closures, suspension and cancellation orders
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 3 August 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Wednesday 2 August 2017

In his second State of the Nation Address, President Duterte gave the same old lip service to mining and the environment, but his statements lacked substance.
There was nothing significantly different from the hollow promises he ranted about in his first State of the Union Address (SONA)
The same old rhetoric of holding large-scale mining companies accountable is
belied by Duterte’s replacement of then-environment secretary Gina Lopez with a
pro-mining ex-general, Roy Cimatu.
Mr. Duterte should start walking his cheap talk by taking large-scale foreign
mining companies to task by upholding the mining closure, suspension and
agreement cancellation orders issued by Lopez.
These orders have been stuck in the Office of the President, and it only needs the political will of someone who is honestly against the big foreign mines.
On his proposal for a new mining policy, it must be emphasized that Mr.
Duterte’s idea of just imposing a new mining tax policy will never be enough to
solve the deep-seated problems of the liberalized mining industry.
We demand that President Duterte immediately scrap the Mining Act of 1995 by passing House Bill 2715 or the People’s Mining Act of 2016 for no less than the full overhaul of our national mining policy.
The Act proposes the implementation of a National Industrialization program for
the mining industry, which is precisely what President Duterte said he
envisioned for the strategic long-term utilization of mineral resources.
It also proposes stricter environmental, socioeconomic and labor regulations, including clear-cut provisions for the mandatory cleanup and rehabilitation of
mining-affected ecosystem and communities that Duterte wants to impose on the
big mining companies.
Duterte should also remove Roy Cimatu from the DENR and appoint an environment secretary who will go above and beyond the standards set by Lopez.
On Duterte’s proposed new agency on disaster risk reduction and management, we
know for a fact that the Duterte regime’s proposal is to transform the NDRRMC
into a Civil Defense Authority, which grants Marcosian powers to the Armed
Forces of the Philippines to interfere in the operations, finances and programs
of NGOs and social movements engaged in disaster risk reduction and management.
We fear that this may be a sugarcoated tool to further militarize the bureaucracy.
What is most detestable is that Duterte still asserts the continuation of his bloody drug war and militarization campaigns that have created the most intense climate of impunity that took the lives of no less than 19 environmental defenders under his bloody iron-fist rule. It is hypocritical and callous to say that he is against big mining when these most reviled transnational corporations have contributed to almost 80 percent of all 120 environment-related killings we have monitored since 2001.
So much for Communications Secretary Martin Andanar’s claim that this Sona will
be exciting for environmentalists.
It seems the only dialogue that works with Duterte is resolute, militant protest. Duterte can expect that we will push for nothing less than the full enforcement of the mining closure, suspension and agreement cancellation orders, the passage of the People’s Mining Act, a pro-people disaster risk management authority and land use policy, and justice for environmental defenders through protest upon protest.

Leon Dulce,
Campaign coordinator,
Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment,
Manila,
Phiippines

 

 

Thai Tsunami alert system
Out of order
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 2 August 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Monday 31 July 2017

Re: "Tsunami alert system 80 perent out of order, in Bangkok Post, Tuesday July 29.
This discovery was a great shame for owners and operators of those broken
systems.
Of course those systems should be in good condition at all times.
Those warning systems should be renovated and combined into systems people use
on a daily basis such as community radio broadcasting, so people can help check
whether they are functioning.

RH Suga,
Lamphun,
Thailand

 

 

Consulate General of Spain in Manila
Refutes allegations as published in Philippine Inquirer
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday, 1 August 2017
First published in the Philipine Inquirer, Friday 28 July 2017

For the second time this year the Inquirer’s Biz Buzz section has deemed it your readers’ interest to write about the Consulate General of Spain in Manila “Consul strikes again,” by Daxim Lucas, Business, 10 July 2017.
Regrettably, such story, going well beyond an unwarranted exercise of press freedom, contains totally false allegations regarding our work.
I can understand your newspaper’s disposition to resonate the tribulations of,
as the author puts it, certain “tycoons” who feel “shabbily treated” and
inconvenienced when dealing with the procedures of the Spanish Public
Administration.
These procedures, enshrined in the Constitution of Spain and scrupulously respected and enacted by the Consulate General of Spain in Manila,
“advocates as the highest values of its legal order, liberty, justice,
equality…”
(Article 1) and “serves the general interest with objectivity and
acts in accordance with the principles of efficiency (…) being fully subject to
justice and the law”
(Article 103).
Given that the concepts of “tisoys” and “Chinoys” are foreign both to my mother
tongue and mentality, I can only assume as the author’s personal lucubration the
proposition that prejudice on my part was the cause of the concerns narrated to him.
Yet, it is my duty to protest the unfounded allegations the piece contains
regarding our work at the Consulate General of Spain in Manila, whose efficiency
and compliance with the law are duly monitored, and accordingly recognized by
the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation, that has appointed me
consul general.
These totally baseless allegations place the content of the Biz Buzz section not
only far beyond the unjustifiable exercise of freedom of communication and
expression, but has even reached the realm of libel and slander.
I am sure this is something that cannot be considered professional or ethical by
a respected newspaper such as the Inquirer.

Javier Martin Garcia,
Consul General,
Consulate General of Spain in Manila,
Philippines



Martial law under Rodrigo Duterte
Differs from martial law under Ferdinand Marcos
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 31 July 201
First published in the Philipine Inquirer, Friday 28 July 2017

Much has been said about martial law and its extension:
(1) “an authoritarian rule under the guise of the protective mantle of
constitutional sanction”;
(2) “Mr. Duterte’s evil plan of domination”; and (3)
“breeding ground of evils and abuses.”

People always tend to correlate Mr. Duterte’s Proclamation No. 216 with the one
promulgated by Ferdinand Marcos.
But what these detractors don’t realize is the factual milieu that sets apart the current martial rule from the other one—actual grave crisis and public necessity.
No matter what they say, nothing can change the fact that enemy forces have been
diminished and the lawlessness and violence are now being contained and
exterminated because of the enhanced military operations under martial rule.
To date, AFP troops are only one square kilometer away from redeeming Marawi from the hands of the rebel groups and terrorists.
We also have an increasing number of neutralized militants, which, if I’m not mistaken, now adds up to 411 combatants.
If only the people don’t turn a blind eye to the fact that our country is facing
something grave that could eradicate our meek archipelago from the map of peace
and prosperity, they will understand the wisdom behind President Duterte’s
decision to put martial law to operative existence.
However, they continue reacting and acting upon the imaginary and alleged evils of martial rule, the existence of which they themselves cannot substantiate.
Every step and measure they pursue that meddles with the affairs of the
administration, the military and other security forces bring the Philippines
closer to becoming a militant and terrorist hub in Southeast Asia.
Every interference they devise in order to prevent responsive measures, such as an
extension of martial law, bolsters the confidence of the enemies and other
similar lawless elements to prey on our country and consume whatever our
peace-loving fellowmen have - up to the last bit.

Rica Bulalacao,
Manila,
Philippines




Call for Thai government
To spend money on Thais
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 29 July 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Monday 17 July 2017

I was no fan of that irresponsible tax money spender and vote buyer Ms Yingluk,
especially when she subsidised the buying of new cars for first-time car
buyers. But when she squandered our tax money, at least most of it was
squandered domestically - the money mostly went to Thais.
The military, on the other hand, wants to give our tax money to the Chinese,
South Koreans, Americans and I don't know who else, but apparently all to
countries that are significantly economically better off than we are.
I would prefer that no government squander our tax money, but if one is going to
squander it, I would prefer that they squander it on Thais, especially the 14
million or so who recently pleaded poverty.

Observer,
Bangkok,
Thailand




Thai PM Prayut Chan-o-cha
Doing an exeellent job
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 28 July 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 26 July 2017

The other day I took my daily afternoon walk with my dog and chanced to meet a
neighbour friend on his bike.
We talked about life and things we have in common until he opened his gob, praising and defending the "Man in Dubai" while faulting the present government for any shortcomings.
I held my tongue and listened to his rant. It seemed he benefited a lot from the previous administration.
He said Yingluck's case is about politics, and not about rice-pledging or dereliction of duty.
He said Thaksin would soon return to Thailand and resume normal life scot-free. Something I found hard to believe.
Our premier is doing the same.
He listens to criticism about some of his government's initiatives. And where these hurt, academics and activists come out to blast his government in unison.
Yes, no one is perfect.
And nothing is perfect.
Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha, you're doing an excellent job trying to move
the country forward.
The task you set out to accomplish is already half-done.
You have a long and arduous slog ahead. Be steadfast in your endeavours.
Remember, always hold your tongue.
Silence is golden. Just keep calm and carry on.

Norman Sr,
Bangkok,
Thailand




The war on drugs in the Philippines
Promulgates a culture of killing and impunity
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 27 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 24 July 2017

Religious activists: Refuse the culture of death, destruction.
As months pass under the watch of President Duterte, our mourning over the death of thousands of poor people caused by the bloody “war on drugs” only intensifies.
We grieve over the declaration and implementation of martial law in Mindanao.
These blend with and further deepen our frustration and disappointment in the unfulfilled promise of change.
Our nation has witnessed the brazenness of state forces in violating human
rights.
Under the Duterte administration, this has gone as far as ever — sparing
no one.
The elderly, women and children have all been included. Alarming impunity underscores great fear in the country as we are daily disturbed by continued reports of “bloody” and brutal liquidations of drug users and drug-dependent persons.
The police approach in addressing the illegal drug trade has been marked by sowing “terror” in the hearts of the poor and marginalized.
Even worse, the bloating of the statistics on drug pushers and drug-dependent
persons has cast a wide net to justify wanton violence and illegal activities by
police elements.
This promulgates a culture of killings and impunity.
Horrible, bloody and fear-inducing stories are leaving yet another generation of
orphans and weeping widows with uncertain futures.
Terror and anxiety overshadow every member of the family as well as entire communities.
Meanwhile, the continuing aerial bombings and displacement of hundreds of
thousands of people is adding to the historic injustice suffered by our Muslim
brothers and sisters.
The war on so-called terrorism has failed to protect the welfare of the majority, but instead has intensified the suffering of the Mindanaoan.
Once again, it promotes the culture of death and destruction.
Martial law in Mindanao and its extension are used to justify militarization and
the continuing human rights violations of lumad, workers and peasants.
Explicitly disregarding the democratic rights of the people, more evacuations of
communities worsen their situation and hamper the atmosphere for peace-building
and peace negotiations.
President Duterte is missing the point. He is missing the truth that the poor
people, the lumad, the Mindanaoan, the farmers and workers are the people to
whom he promised change.
He fails to see that these poor and marginalized ones are being victimized by martial law and brutalized by his “war on drugs” and the prevailing culture of death and destruction.

Rev. Grace Masegman,
Cochair,
Promotion of Church People’s Response,
Manila.
Philippines




Time for the Philippine boxing champ
To hang up his gloves
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 26 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 24 July 2017

No offense, nothing personal, Manny!
But why is it that whenever you lose, you believe and you think that the boxing judges cheated you?
I cannot figure out what is wrong with you.
You have more than enough wealth, a nice family and many friends who love you.
Manny, your time has passed and it’s time to hang up the gloves.
Many fighters are better than you are and it makes no sense to keep pushing yourself till you drop dead.
“Magkawanggawa ka naman.” It’s a good project for you in sports.
That will become your passion, too and is very rewarding.
But you always seem to work for money only.
Well, that time is over for you.
Be smart and listen to your family and your friends who keep admonishing you to stop your craziness.
It only takes one punch to end your career and ruin your health and life forever. Good luck!

C.P. Goss,
North Fairview, QC,
Manila,
Philippines

 

 

Call for end to martial law
In Mindanao
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 25 July 2017
First Published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 18 July 2017

Martial law in Mindanao should never be extended. How does
Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez know that if he agreed to the extension of martial law
for another five years, something good would happen? How can he say, “Extend
martial law for the duration of President Duterte’s term”?
Alvarez wants martial law for his own benefit. Wow! Doesn’t he see that the
people are suffering too much? They are living very uncomfortable lives, and
children are dying.
Please stop this and rebuild Marawi. You should do something other than
extending martial law and continuing to destroy the city. Have mercy on the
people of Marawi. Please. Pray that God will give you all the wisdom and
direction that you need.

Caroline Vitaliano-Cruz,
Manola,
Philippines

 

 

Moros are the same brothers and sisters
As Malaysians and Indonesians
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 24 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 17 July 2017

Following the news about the fighting in Marawi, we come acr
oss some numbers.
The conflict started out with about 100 Maute fighters, according to the news, and then it went up to 300 to 500 when they received reinforcements from other groups.
Last week it was announced that they were down to 80. Interestingly, there was a military intelligence report about 500,000 arms supposedly in nongovernment hands.
If we do some analysis of, let us say, 10,000 separatist fighters, how many are part-timers who fight today and go home to their communities tomorrow?
As Filipinos, we have to ask ourselves:
How long will this go on?
How much more spilled blood can we take, in both the government side and the separatist side?
Will the fighting even end?
Fundamentally, we are dealing with an ideology, a belief system that provides
oxygen whether we agree or not on individuals’ sense of being.
It is further reinforced by calls of radical fundamentalism from abroad.
What is the peaceful solution to this conflict?
And what will that bloodless solution entail?
Is the Philippine nation strong enough to handle separatist movements in Mindanao?
If martial law is imposed on the island for five more years, as suggested by some lawmakers, what will life be like for its residents?
Will it solve the problem of differing ideology and fundamental beliefs?
Perhaps the nation as governed by Filipinos is failing?
It seems to have failed miserably, and the wish of Manuel L. Quezon of Filipinos
running the country even if they run it like hell seems to have come true.
In that context, imagine how the Moros could have benefited from all this.
The solution may be a referendum for residents of the affected areas:
Do they still want to be part of this country?
What matters are the votes of the people actually affected, not those of lawmakers who are living in the comfort of their mansions in Manila or elsewhere.
The affected people - aren’t they composed of men and women who have the right of self-determination and forging the future for their children and their children’s children?
We have to remind ourselves, especially those of us in other parts of the country, that the Moros are the same brothers and sisters to us as the Malaysians and Indonesians, with whom our blood and history before colonialism
were intertwined.
There will be no loss, just gains.

Jose Santamaria,
Manila,
Philippines




Mali the elephant has been in a zoo
Since given to Imelda Marcos
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 22 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 17 July 2017

The statement quoted in the report on Bertha the hippo supposedly having lived a happy life in Manila’s zoo is false in Philippine Inquirer Friday 12 July 2017.
Manila Parks and Recreations Bureau Director James Albert Dichaves tried to
refute Jason Baker, vice president of the People for the Ethical Treatment of
Animals (Peta), by claiming that Bertha was “happy interacting with our
zookeepers.”

That statement is laughable.
Has anyone really monitored the daily number of hours zoo keepers romp around with the animals?
I visited Manila’s zoo soon after the petitions for the release of Mali the elephant began around 2010. D
The zoo was in a pitiful state; there was hardly any greenery in any of the cages. The few zookeepers I saw seemed disinterested in the animals.
I was told that a vet sometimes visited Mali, who has been in the zoo since she was given as a baby to Imelda Marcos by the Sri Lankan government.
To look at Mali’s misery is heartbreaking.
Mayors Alfredo Lim and Joseph Estrada ignored all demands by Peta to be allowed to take her to an elephant sanctuary in Thailand.
Absurd reasons were given for why she could not be shipped - that she was doing okay, and that she would be unable to survive the trip, etc.
I would not be surprised if Mali will be the next death at Manila’s pitiful zoo.

Isabel Escoda,
Cebu City,
Philippines


 

Call for trial in absentia
For former PM Thaksin and Red Bull heir
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 22 July 2017
First Published in the Bangkok Post, Monday 17 July 2017

Re: "Political law blasted for bias, ambiguity", in Bangkok Post, Saturday 15 July 2017.
The National Legislative Assembly passed a draft organic law on criminal
procedures for holders of political positions to allow trials in absentia.
Critics point out that since the defendant will not be present in such a trial,
he cannot defend himself and the law is thus unjust. They also charge this law
is directed against a single person, that is Thaksin, now in self-exile.
A trial in absentia can be just if the defendant's absence is truly voluntary
which surely holds in Thaksin's case, so I have no problems with that. If
Thaksin so wishes, he can appoint someone to defend him.
But I suggest that trials in absentia should be used for other serious crimes as
well, where the maximum penalty would be imprisonment for a given number of
years, or death -- such as homicide. Thus, for example, Red Bull scion Vorayuth
"Boss" Yoovidhya should be tried for the alleged killing of a cop with his
Ferrari -- if PM Prayut Chan-o-cha has the political will to bring all under one
legal standard.
A law must be just and applied without fear or favour, and that is what we
should do.

Burin Kantabutra,
Bangkok,
Thailand




Call for Philippine president Duterte to deliver social justice
To millions of poor coconut farmers
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 21 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 17 July 2017

It has been a year since President Duterte assumed office.
During his campaign he promised to deliver social justice to the millions of
poor coconut farmers in the country.
Back in March 2016, then Mayor Duterte, with his running mate Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano, signed a commitment to coconut farmers in Quezon province, assuring them of benefits from the recovered coconut levy. The two candidates were referring to some of the cases involving the recovery of the coconut levy filed by the Philippine government against Danding Cojuangco and cohorts that were decided with finality after almost 30 years in court.
Since October 2012 the government has been in possession of some P69.5 billion
in cash coming from the redemption of preferred shares in San Miguel Corp. — a
block of shares funded by the levy way back in 1983.
This amount has feebly grown to P75 billion at present, as more than 80 percent of the fund earns no interest at all.
Worse, not a single centavo may be used until such time that a law governing the utilization of the fund is in place.
The issue of the coconut levy recovery and utilization has been repeatedly
addressed by administrations from past to present since the fall of the Marcos
dictatorship.
All failed in their promises due to prolonged court litigation so they say.
But in the main, it was really the lack of political will of leaders or their closeness and subservience to Cojuangco and associates that prevented the sequestered or recovered coconut levy from benefiting the coconut farmers who so badly deserve and need it.
For decades the coconut farming sector has persevered despite continuing
frustrations and dampened expectations from politicians.
The Kilos Magniniyog march from Davao City to Malacañang finally pushed the courts to issue an entry of judgment on the case of the SMC shares in December 2014, more than two years after the final decision; pushed the Aquino administration to issue an executive order after keeping mum on the topic; and pushed the House of Representatives to pass the bill creating a Coconut Farmers and Industry Trust Fund on third reading during the 16th Congress.
But politics continues to stand inthe way, as it has for decades.
Despite promises, the Senate miserably dropped the counterpart bill at its end the last time around. Today the 17th Congress is again abuzz with the same bill at hand.
But where it is really headed is so uncertain, as not much has changed in the
legislature.
Coconut farmers continue their battle for social justice. But they need a worthy
champion in the government who can change the odds for the better. President
Duterte will have to “force the issue in Congress” if his commitment still
stands.

Joey Faustino,
Executive director,
Coconut Industry Reform (COIR) Movement Inc.,



Call for Philippine president Duterte to deliver social justice
To millions of poor coconut farmers
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 21 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 17 July 2017

It has been a year since President Duterte assumed office.
During his campaign he promised to deliver social justice to the millions of
poor coconut farmers in the country. Back in March 2016, then Mayor Duterte,
with his running mate Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano, signed a commitment to coconut
farmers in Quezon province, assuring them of benefits from the recovered coconut
levy. The two candidates were referring to some of the cases involving the
recovery of the coconut levy filed by the Philippine government against Danding
Cojuangco and cohorts that were decided with finality after almost 30 years in
court.
Since October 2012 the government has been in possession of some P69.5 billion
in cash coming from the redemption of preferred shares in San Miguel Corp. — a
block of shares funded by the levy way back in 1983. This amount has feebly
grown to P75 billion at present, as more than 80 percent of the fund earns no interest at
all. Worse, not a single centavo may be used until such time that a law
governing the utilization of the fund is in place.
The issue of the coconut levy recovery and utilization has been repeatedly
addressed by administrations from past to present since the fall of the Marcos
dictatorship. All failed in their promises due to prolonged court litigation —
or so they say. But in the main, it was really the lack of political will of
leaders or their closeness and subservience to Cojuangco and associates that
prevented the sequestered or recovered coconut levy from benefiting the coconut
farmers who so badly deserve and need it.
For decades the coconut farming sector has persevered despite continuing
frustrations and dampened expectations from politicians. The Kilos Magniniyog
march from Davao City to Malacañang finally pushed the courts to issue an entry
of judgment on the case of the SMC shares in December 2014, more than two years
after the final decision; pushed the Aquino administration to issue an executive
order after keeping mum on the topic; and pushed the House of Representatives to
pass the bill creating a Coconut Farmers and Industry Trust Fund on third
reading during the 16th Congress.
But politics continues to stand inthe way, as it has for decades. Despite
promises, the Senate miserably dropped the counterpart bill at its end the last
time around. Today the 17th Congress is again abuzz with the same bill at hand.
But where it is really headed is so uncertain, as not much has changed in the
legislature.
Coconut farmers continue their battle for social justice. But they need a worthy
champion in the government who can change the odds for the better. President
Duterte will have to “force the issue in Congress” if his commitment still
stands.

Joey Faustino,
Executive director, Coconut Industry Reform (COIR) Movement Inc.,

 

 

Women had high hopes
When President Duterte came into power
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 20 July 2017
First Published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 3 July 2017

Filipino women have been suffering for decades under a succession of governments who have promised change. Genuine social change, however, never came. Governments came and went, but the same social problems remained — kleptocracy, the plunder of our country’s resources, widespread poverty, joblessness, landlessness, low wages.
Women became modern slaves, laboring without end in a futile attempt to ward off hunger and homelessness; suffering the lack of support services for their own basic needs; experiencing grave abuses of their human rights in the hands of men in uniform as they defend their land, their homes and their communities from local and foreign big business; experiencing sexual and other forms of violence against their person.
Women had high hopes when President Duterte came into power, even taking an active role when peace negotiations between the National Democratic Front of the Philippines and the government began.
We anticipated the realization of the Comprehensive Agreement on Socio-Economic Reforms (Caser) as a possible way to peace, a possible avenue for reforms in the fundamental issues of the nation, which are also the fundamental issues of women: land reform, expanded basic social services, national industrialization, an end to low wages and contractualization.
A sudden turn of events, however, threatens to put these initiatives into the dustbin. The government panel canceled the fifth round of the peace talks.
The declaration of martial law in Mindanao worsened the climate of impunity with which the Armed Forces commit human rights abuses against peasant and indigenous communities.
Government response to the Marawi siege has turned severely out of proportion, with ground assaults and indiscriminate aerial bombings causing massive destruction and innumerable loss of lives.
It is now a war against terror that has itself sown terror among the people of Marawi.
A war gone awry, whose consequences are bound to fall heavily on women’s shoulders as they struggle to rebuild what is left of their previous homes and communities.
The entry of US military forces into what should be a purely Philippine military and police operation in Marawi runs counter to the Duterte administration’s pronouncement of adopting an independent foreign policy.
US intervention threatens to turn our country into another laboratory for a US-defined war, a war with no clear parameters and no clear boundaries.
As if these weren’t enough, President Duterte’s own callousness, as shown by his seemingly habitual jokes about rape and disrespectful treatment of women, abets his allies’ misogynist attitude and the Armed Forces’ impunity in violating women’s human rights.
Women have had enough!
We demand genuine change. We demand respect and guarantees for women’s human rights.
We urge the Duterte government to carry out its pronouncements for a truly independent foreign policy.
There can be no real peace without social justice. We call for the resumption of the peace talks and demand a successful conclusion to Caser. End Martial Law Now!

Mo. Mary John Mananzan, Osb, Institute of Women’s Studies,
Carmencita P. Karagdad, Ecumenical Women’s Forum,
Gert Ranjo-Libbang, Gabriela National,
Darlene Marquez-Caramanzana, Association of Women in Theology and Women from various groups




There is a bottom line to national security that
No sovereign country like China can ignore
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 19 July 2017
First published in the Nation, Thursday 6 July 2017

Hong Kong democracy activists are pawns in a Western plan to checkmate
rising China.
When President Xi Jinping visited Hong Kong last week on the 20th anniversary of
its reunion with the mainland, Western media attacked China for “meddling” that
has caused a deterioration of freedom on the island.
How can we ask China to stop meddling with Hong Kong, when it is in fact a part
of her territory?
Beijing has not backtracked on any promises it made at the handover, as widely
alleged.
Meanwhile “patriotic national education” denounced by Hong Kong’s pro-democracy activists is now proven necessary, as evidenced by protesters waving British flags and chanting for independence at the weekend.
Businesspeople understand that Hong Kong is fully supported by China under the
“one country, two systems” policy.
They would like to see a stable Hong Kong climbing aboard China’s fast train to prosperity, and condemned protesters who wanted to wreck that plan by forcefully occupying the financial district and downtown a couple of years ago.
The social unrest instigated by student activists has not only eroded the financial competitiveness of the island, but also pulled down the ranking of several Hong Kong universities, the breeding ground for many of these protesters.
I have relatives born in the 1990s who sympathise with the activists because of
growing job insecurity, high property prices and the nuisance caused by mainland
Chinese tourists flooding the island.
However, these are economic issues that the Hong Kong government has to tackle; they have nothing to do with democracy.
The majority in Hong Kong is revolted by the childish conduct of those activists
advocating independence.
They are pawns in a game that the West is using in its attempts to destabilise China. By offering them moral support, irresponsible Western media only encourage a situation where the protesters will eventually be imprisoned on treason charges. There is a bottom line to national security that no sovereign country can ignore, and President Xi explicitly announced that in his visit to Hong Kong last week.

Yingwai Suchaovanich,
Hong Kong


 

President Duterte is empowered under the 1987 Constitution
To proclaim martial law in Mindanao
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 18 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday13 July 2017

As an ordinary citizen who wants nothing more than a safe, peaceful and orderly society for myself and my family, I strongly agree with the decision promulgated by the Supreme Court on July 4, upholding President Duterte’s proclamation of martial law over the entire Mindanao.
I humbly believe that the position taken by the Court on the issue truly exemplifies a unified stance which any government should assume when faced with public disorder and lawlessness, like the recent Marawi attacks.
I am even more relieved to know that the Court has - as it always has - tilted the scales of justice to embrace objectivity, reason and compassion for the protection and welfare of the Filipino people.
President Duterte both has the power and duty to protect and safeguard the
Filipino populace against acts of rebellion, terrorism and other forms of lawless violence.
In fact, he is empowered under the 1987 Philippine Constitution to do so. Accordingly, “whenever it becomes necessary, he may call out such armed forces to prevent or suppress lawless violence, invasion or rebellion.
Also, in case of invasion or rebellion, when the public safety requires it, he may likewise place the Philippines or any part thereof under martial law.”

Indeed, “whenever it becomes necessary.”
Although I am not from Marawi and other conflict-stricken areas, I strongly believe that what the President did is but necessary and called for.
It is devastating that some individuals, particularly the critics of the recently imposed martial rule, choose not to see the real and critical situation faced by our brothers and sisters, who have been trapped and distressed by the armed conflict instigated by the Maute group.
While their sentiments and apprehensions should not outright be taken for granted, I humbly submit that the welfare of our distressed countrymen should be of paramount consideration.
Lodging a petition before the Supreme Court in order to seek the invalidation of
an executive measure that protects the people of Marawi and of the entire
Mindanao against jeopardy on the ground of “lack of factual basis” is, to me,
nothing but a motion bereft of any consideration and compassion at all.
How much “factual basis” do they need in order to be convinced that martial law in Mindanao is anchored on true and actual necessity?
Need our Marawi brothers and sisters suffer more just to provide justification for President Duterte’s executive act?
Fortunately, objectivity prevailed and the Supreme Court took judicial notice of the real situation in Marawi and the threat to the rest of Mindanao.
The decision to uphold the validity of Mr. Duterte’s martial law proclamation
over the whole of Mindanao also demonstrates how the doctrine of the separation
of powers and principle of check-and-balance are never hindrances to achieving a
solid and stable stance against lawlessness and terrorism, to maintain peace and
order in the country.

Divine S. Ojeda,
Manila,
Philippines


 

 

Philipines call for unity in protection
Against Chinese in West Philippine Sea
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 17 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 13 July 2017

Missiles and military facilities are being built in parts of the West Philippine Sea. Meaning, China need not invade us to control our natural resources and install a willing dictator.
This scenario is becoming clear; we should anticipate it to prevent its realization.
The foremost step is to overcome the fear which is being inculcated.
We must constantly recall and banner the patriotism invested by heroes for us to
be free.
We must remind ourselves of the necessity of sacrifice.
The betterment and improvement of conditions for those who are to come after us could be the drive we need to once again unite us.

Fr. Ely Trespalacios,
Manila,
Philipines




Cruelty to animals will end when animals
Are not held as exhibits in zoos
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 16 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 11 July 2017

Bertha’s life at the Manila Zoo was one full of boredom, misery and deprivation.
It’s a tragedy that she only realized freedom through death, and other animals imprisoned in zoos, including Mali the elephant, continue to suffer.
They are denied everything that’s natural to them, and every aspect of their lives is manipulated and controlled.
They are told when they will eat, what they will eat, when they can sleep, and who they can mate with.
Their enclosures, like Bertha’s was, are tiny fractions of the size of their natural habitats, and their specific needs are neglected.
This cruelty will end only when animals are no longer held as living “exhibits,” which won’t happen until people refuse to patronize zoos.

Jason Baker,
Vice president of international campaigns,
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals,
Manila,
Philippines



Call for assurance for rehabilitation of Marawi
As soon as city is liberated from ISIS
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 15 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 11 July 2017

I fully support and agree with President Duterte’s statement that the real enemies of the government and the military in the siege of Marawi City are the members of the IS-Daesh-inspired Abu Sayyaf-Maute group, and not the local Moro community.
The enemies are local extremists and bandits who want to propagate their imported ideology of “destroy and kill” just to achieve their evil goals of creating a new global Muslim caliphate and making the city a province of the Islamic State.
I am a native of Marawi now engaged in a jewelry business with my family in Manila, and I have seen the damage done to the city and the hundreds of thousands of residents displaced by the siege, with the bandits using their homes and buildings as hiding places to fire and snipe at the soldiers hunting them.
I really am very sad to see video footage of the displaced families, the hostage-survivors, the civilians and soldiers killed by the bandits.
These extremists should all be held accountable for the gravity of their sins.
Also, I wish and pray that the President’s assurance to allot P20 billion for the rehabilitation and rebuilding of all houses, buildings and other edifices in Marawi will materialize as soon as the city is liberated from the bandits.
The fulfillment of that promise will compel the residents as well as national and local officials to believe in the sincerity of the Duterte administration, and will surely not allow the return of the IS-inspired groups to the city or any other part of Mindanao.

Shaira Fahad R. Dimaporo,
Manila,
Philippines




Former Philippine president Aquino has forgotten
That soldiers died saving his life
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 14 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Tuesday 4 July 2017

Supposedly, the pension rate of retired military personnel is based on the salary of active military men.
Unfortunately, when the preceding Aquino administration raised the salaries of active military personnel, it did not allocate a budget for the corresponding increase in the pension of retired military personnel.
Being a retired military man, I felt deserted by our former commander in chief
because of this oversight.
I surmise thousands of families left by those who sacrificed their lives on battlefields feel similarly.
Former president Benigno Aquino III should have taken into account, too, the
sacrifices made by the retired military personnel who spent the prime of their
lives in the service of our country, away from home and family.
Now that they are in the twilight years of their lives, they are being denied the benefits they ought to receive.
The former president might have forgotten that soldiers died saving his life
and did not abandon him when he was ambushed and wounded by rebel soldiers.
May this letter reach President Duterte as an appeal for his administration to
allocate a budget for the corresponding increase in the pension of retired
military personnel, and the fallen soldiers’ widows and children.

Ildeonso G. Falla,
Paraianaque City,
Philippines




The greater the number of generals in Thailand
The better it is to maintain control under martial law
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 13 July 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 5 July 2017

Re: "Top-heavy top brass", in Bangkok Post Wednesday 28 June 2017
This informative letter from Darius Hober regarding the high number of generals
in the Thai military comes at a time when their position in society needs to be
reviewed by all concerned citizens.
It is quite obvious that this number of generals far exceeds the amount needed
for repelling a foreign attack or defending the country, which begs the question, why so many?
Once the military is accepted as a sociopolitical group which, like all Thai institutions, works from the top down, it's obvious that the greater the number at the top, the better it is to maintain control.
Seeing the military as an institution necessary for the control of the population
rather than a method of defence makes sense of the numbers.
Darius then suggests the PM should be doing something about this in his position
of maintaining good governance and fiscal administration, but that, of course,
is impossible.
His position as PM is totally reliant on being at the top of this pyramid.
He owes his success to this high number and is therefore unlikely to make any changes to a winning formula.

Lungstib,
Chiang Mai,
Thailand





Promises given by new Philippines president
Given way to compromise, reversals and betrayal
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 6 July 2017
The Southeast Asian Times, Wednesday 12 July 2017

The promise that change is coming under the new President seems to have come and gone.
There was so much to look forward to when Rodrigo Duterte came to power on the crest of popularity, novelty and cruelty.
People waited with varying degrees of disbelief and hope that criminality would wane, corruption curbed, impunity abated, economic well-being assured, foreign intervention and domination stopped, and a principled, just and lasting peace pursued.
Many just yearned for simple common sense, decency and dignity that the past administrations took away.
Never mind the unique bluster, hyperbole or histrionics of an enigmatic leader. Never mind too the arrogant public officials who fantasize that they are omnipotent. Nor the dimwitted public servants who think public service is a private trust fund.
But after one year, the demagogic promises seem to have given way to compromise, reversals and even betrayal over time.
Indeed talk is cheap, especially the populist kind. What matters is: Whose side is the President really on?
Who is really in charge here?
Is it the oligarchs, military and the neoliberals?
Is it the fascists and machiavellian political and economic elite that hold sway?
Why are scores of farmers still landless? Why do workers still get routinely laid off before half a year? Why are many still jobless and the face of poverty is still in our streets?
Why don’t we still have our own industries even while we have abundant minerals, timber, waters and all? Why is Mary Jane still on death row?
Why are the poor being slaughtered casually even as families get raped and massacred by evil petty druggies?
Why is there still no accountability for rights violators? Why are many now generals, Cabinet members, ambassadors and corporate board members?
Why are there still multiple standards of justice and the people still cynical about the courts?
Why are the police and military feared and still have credibility issues? Why are torture and police brutality still commonplace?
Why is there an expansive martial law at all? And why are dictators called heroes?
Why are there still hundreds of political prisoners facing false charges, many sick and elderly? Why are the peace negotiations and socio-economic solutions conditioned on capitulation?
Why are there still US boots on the ground and foreign wings in the air? Why do we still siphon out our rich resources and get processed crumbs back?
And before we forget, why the hell is Edsa still a big carpark even while the daily commuter becomes corned beef incarnate?
Yes, we need more of SSS, Pandi and Lapanday.
We need more of Ka Paeng, Judy and the like in every interstice of government. And we need to be treated with respect as a people.
We need justice as we need food.
We need liberation as we need land. We need peace as we need progress.
We need more than rambling narratives and confusing signals, no matter how amusing.
We need real change.
The nation needs a new birth.
Walk the talk, Mr. President.
Be on the side of the people you love as you committed, not in the cradle of those who will eventually stab you in the back when you have outlived your usefulness to them.

Edre U. Olalia, president,
Ephraim B. Cortez, secretary general,
Maria Cristina P. Yambot, public information officer,
National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers,
Manila,
Philippines

 


Weapons from China
Undermines strength of Thai defence forces
The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 11 July 2017
First Published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 5 July 2017

Re: "US approves new Black Hawk helicopter sales", Bangkok Post, Friday June 30
It may be easier and cheaper, but Thai armed forces should not buy weapons from
China.
Buying weapons from China undermines the strength of our defence forces in case
of Chinese invasion since the country will know well what type of arms we have
and how to use them.
Buying weapons from the US and other countries is a good choice because they have very little intension of invading Thailand, and because Chinese would not have enough knowledge about our military secrets.

RH Suga,
Lamphun,
Thailand




Call for watch on crooked politicians
In rebuilding of Marawai City
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 10 July 2017
Fisrt published by the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 6 July 2017

The government, through the Department of Public Works and Highways, is reportedly formulating a ‘master plan’ to rebuild, reconstruct and rehabilitate’ Marawi City once the fighting ends there.
That is very good news for the thousands of residents of the city, many of whom
had fled to neighboring towns and cities because of the fighting between
government troops and the Abu Sayyaf-Maute terrorist group combine that led to
the destruction of their homes and loss of lives of relatives.
Public Works Secretary Mark Villar said the administration would avoid the
mistakes that were committed when the government rebuilt communities in Eastern
Visayas devastated by Supertyphoon “Yolanda.”
The government, reports said, will allot P20 billion for that purpose, and I
hope that local and national politicians from Mindanao will not be taking
advantage of their positions to corner contracts and exact kickbacks from the
effort.
It would take years, if ever it would be implemented, before the “master plan”
can be finally completed.
And I hope that our soldiers and police force would be present before and during the rebuilding and rehabilitation of Marawi City to keep watch against terrorists and at the same time prevent crooked politicians from taking advantage of the situation.
When the government rebuilt communities in Eastern Visayas devastated by
Yolanda, politicians from the region dipped their hands into every project,
lobbying to have their favored contractors bag contracts, resulting in
substandard homes and facilities.
I hope that the President and Secretary Villar will tap the AFP and the PNP to
monitor and denounce crooked politicians who will take advantage of the
situation when the ‘master plan’ to rebuild Marawi City starts.

Danar. Del Rosario,
Manila,
Philippines



Move over Makati City
A new financial center is born
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 9 July 2017
First pubished in the Philippine Inquirer, Thursday 6 July 2017

Taguig City today is undeniably emerging as the Philippines’ financial center.
What makes Taguig City tick and click?
Well, plain and simple.
Ample spaces, less traffic, good location, an ecofriendly environment, good
governance and most important a graft-free city government.
Multinational companies such as BPOs, hotels, condos, malls, international schools, etc., are all located in Taguig’s Bonifacio Global City. More local and foreign companies and even government offices such as the Supreme Court are already about to set up shop in the sprawling Bonifacio Global City in the near future.
So … move over Makati City? A new financial center is born.

Pedro V. Refuerzo Jr., jn.,
Manila,
Philippines

 

Genuine tax reform means reversing
The pro-rich bias in the taxation system
The Southeast Asian Times, Saturday 8 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Friday 29 June 2017

The existing tax system in the Philippines, already biased toward the rich, is up for reform.
However, the Duterte administration’s proposed tax reform package House Bill No. 5636, also referred to as the Tax Reform Acceleration and Inclusion Act or TRAIN, recently adopted by the House of Representatives, further burdens the poor and low-income earners.
Genuine tax reform means reversing the pro-rich bias in the taxation system.
It must be a mechanism that redistributes wealth from the rich to the rest of the
population. Income inequality is increasing, with the richest families earning
nine times more than poor families.
Genuine tax reform should be a mechanism for reducing the gap in income inequality.
But the Duterte administration’s tax reform does the opposite.
According to estimates by some legislators, it reduces the income of the bottom 60 percent of the households.
The monthly take-home pay of poor households will shrink by P1,189 and those of middle-class workers by P13,652.
According to the bill, workers earning P250,000 a year or approximately P20,000
per month won’t have to pay taxes.
Yes, but this looks like a con scheme.
More of our income will go to paying the value added tax (VAT): The VAT will be
expanded and it will be imposed on some exempted goods and services.
According to some estimates, the government will be collecting around P170 billion less from the richest families, while the rest of us will be paying more than P340
billion for previously VAT-exempt items.
We will pay more for oil and petroleum products as the excise tax on these
commodities will be increased (P3-P6 excise tax per liter of fuel).
The overall package would result in a net gain of P133.8 billion for the
government.
This tax revenue will mainly fund the Duterte administration’s trillions worth of infrastructure spending; but note the lucrative contracts for these projects under the program will be awarded to the corporate rich.
It’s a win-win for the rich and their corporations, while the rest of us are
being conned into paying the lucrative infrastructure contracts to be awarded to
the corporate rich, which will include foreign-owned firms.
In view of this, Partido Lakas ng Masa calls for genuine tax reform to
redistribute wealth and reduce the income inequality between the rich and the
rest of the Filipino populace.
It means scrapping VAT; implementing a steeply graduated and progressive tax system where the wealthy pay their share; introducing a wealth tax for the super rich; exacting bigger tax from environment polluters; ending the billions of pesos in public subsidies to private corporations, banks and energy companies; doubling the tax free threshold to P500,000 a year; increasing the minimum wage and the social wage, among others.

Rei Melencio,
Partido Lakas ng Masa,
Manila,
Philippines




Hong Kong cannot be independent
Hong Kong's economy depends on China
The Southeast Asian Times, Friday 7 July 2017
First Published in The Bangkok Post Wednesday 5 July 2017

Re: "China must stop meddling", in Bangkok Post, Wednesday 5 July 2017.
Your editorial says: "Only Beijing can make things right by living up to the one
country, two systems principle".

This small island was robbed by Queen Victoria's navy when China tried to stop
UK traders who brought in opium to destroy the health of Chinese people and
damage China's economy (the annual sale of opium at that time was sixfold higher
than China's national budget). Since the occupation of Hong Kong by the UK is
not right and fair, why does Beijing have to honour that promise?
Hong Kong cannot be independent because its economy thrives on China's support.
It also cannot survive without water supplied from the mainland at a friendly
price.

Prasan Stianrapapongs,
Pattaya,
Thailanda



What good is a hundred thousand pesos
To a centenarian?
The Southeast Asian Times, Thursday 6 July 2017
First Philippine Inquirer, Saturday 1 July 2017

A case of too little, too late?
Well, maybe not too little. But yes, perhaps too late.
Approved by the House of Representatives as House Bill No. 834, the Centenarians
Act of 2010 gives Filipino senior citizens reaching the ripe old age of 100 a
cash gift of P100,000, plus 50 percent discount on the purchase of goods and
services, as well as exemptions on value-added tax
Authored by then Minority Leader Edcel Lagman, the bill is well-intended, and is doubtless welcome news to the estimated 8,000 superseniors it is meant to bless.
But of what good is a hundred thousand pesos to a centenarian? Sure, it may help
defray the cost of hospital and medical bills, pay for medication and caregivers
-a dismal list - but will it really bring cheer to the hearts of the old dears?
I doubt it!
Likewise, whom will it really benefit, the intended beneficiaries, or their
caregivers?
Not that caregivers don’t deserve to be rewarded.
But if the amount is genuinely intended to ease the lot and bring cheer to the targeted
beneficiaries, shouldn’t it perhaps be made earlier, at a time in their lives when they can still enjoy its benefits say, at 90 instead of 100?
Let’s face it!
There is not much a 100-year-old can do with P100,000, no matter how healthy or fit he/she may be at that age. A decade earlier perhaps, and the beneficiary may be better able to appreciate, use and enjoy the gift.
But at 100, it’s like giving the centenarian a pair of dancing shoes!

Blanche Daid-Gallardo,
Muninnlupa City
Philippines



Philippines only nation in Southeast Asia
To aid Jews during World War Two
The Southeast AsianTimes, Wednesday 5 July 2017
First published in the Philippine Inquirer, Monday 3 July 2017

Allow me to openly thank the Inquirer for the very inspiring article “Monument to Philippine humanitarianism rises in Israel” in Philippine Inquirer 12 June.
In times like this, we’re proud to be Filipinos.
The article relates how the Philippine Commonwealth, led by President Manuel L.
Quezon, issued 30,000 passports to Jews in 1939 to help rescue them from
persecution.
This “humanitarian gesture made an impact on the consciousness of Jewish survivors who had to pick up the pieces of their shattered selves after the war. To the Jews and the Israelis, the Philippines was the only nation in Asia to run to their aid.”
The article wonderfully continued: “As a result, the Philippines has been numbered by Israel and the Jews among ‘Righteous Gentiles.’”
In a recent visit to Washington, DC, we noticed, in the Holocaust Memorial
Museum, that the Philippines seems to be not included in the list of those who
extended help to the Jews.
Anyway, the humanitarian act that our country did is worthy of emulation by leaders and citizens alike as a noble act of rising above self in serving the needs of others.
The article likewise mentioned that a modern public sculpture called “Open
Doors”
was installed in Tel Aviv, Israel, where these cherished words of Quezon
are inscribed:
It is my hope and, indeed, my expectation that the people of the Philippines will have in the future every reason to be glad that when the time of need came, the country was willing to extend a hand of welcome.”
These are heartening marks of the Filipino traits of compassion and hospitality
that must be passed on from generation to generation.

Ching D. Aunario,
Manila,
Philippines

 

 

Chinese-Thai rail project from Bangkok to Lao border
Not really needed

The Southeast Asian Times, Tuesday 4 July 2017T
First published in the Bangkok Post, Sunday 30 June 2017

The Chinese-Thai rail project is wrong for several reasons.
To begin with, it's not really needed. Secondly, even its proponents admit it
will probably be a money-loser. Third, it will cost more than the
170-billion-baht estimate, as all big-ticket municipal items in Thailand always
cost more in the long run.
Thailand will be committed to paying Chinese banks mega-amounts of money for
something akin to the giant concrete monuments leading out to Don Mueang
airport. The self-appointed military men needed to take over government a few
years ago, to lessen political demonstrations, but they should have started, on
day one, to steer Thailand toward new elections. That could have taken six to 10
months. Instead, they've put themselves in power semi-permanently and are making
big decisions for Thailand's future for the next 60 years. They're committing
future Thai generations to sending a trillion baht to China to pay for military
hardware and fancy infrastructure that's not really needed.
Thailand needs elected leaders to steer towards its future -- not self-appointed
military men who primarily care about using taxpayer money to buy expensive
military items (and speedy trains of questionable quality) from China.

Kip Keino,
Bangkok,
Thailand




A greater loss than the sale of the British Embassy in Bangkok
Is the duty of care by embassies of their expats
The Southeast Asian Times, Monday 3 July 2017
First published in the Bangkok Post, Wednesday 28 June 2017

Regarding the sale of the British Embassy in Ploenchit, whilst I share the view
that the loss of the current place is a pity, there is no question the embassy's
role, make-up and way of doing business has changed a great deal in the 17 years
since I left it.
Yes, it was a marvellous and spacious place in which to work and the number of UK-based staff was much greater than it is now.
Apart from its diplomatic role as the British government's representative in Thailand, the embassy carried out all the traditional services that expatriates had come to expect.
Fast-forward a few years and reductions in budget and staff, coupled with a "do
highly paid diplomats need to do x?" approach from whitehall, has inevitably led
to the outsourcing of these services at - and I have no qualms in stating this
- extortionate prices.
It has also led to the selling off of the real estate, although no doubt much of the revenue from this will be sucked up by the new location purchase and move.
Like most British expats here, I mourn the passing of the old embassy, but you
can't fight City Hall and you can't turn the clock back.
But the greater loss is of what might have been termed the "duty of care" by embassies for their resident expats.
However, the standards are not set by them, but by the UK government, and there are precious few signs of any sort of duty of care from that source.

Col Johnny Thoyts,
Bangkok,
Thailand



Call for Malaysians not to be influenced
By US statements against Malaysian government
The Southeast Asian Times, Sunday 2 July 2017
First published in New Straits Times, Monday 260June 2017

It is crucial for Malaysians not to be influenced by statements made by the
United States against our government.
The series of statements by the US Department of Justice against the Malaysian
government since last year cannot be considered facts as they are just accusations. They have made many accusations, but why has there been no action taken against the accused?
I agree with Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Abdul Rahman Dahlan’s statement that DoJ should clarify and provide proof of their
accusations. Contrary to popular sentiment, 1MDB was never a party to the civil
suit submitted by DoJ.
However, when DoJ issues statements with terms such as “the Malaysian
government”, “Malaysian Official No. 1” and “MO1”,
it creates the perception that our country’s leaders are in the centre of its investigation.
The fact is that last year, Public Accounts Committee vice-chairman Dr Tan Seng
Giaw, who is Kepong DAP member of parliament, stated that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was not involved in any 1MDB dealing and acted only as a non-executive chairman of the advisory board of the government-owned company.
We have to remember that if an accusation or information comes from any
government department or agency of the US, we need to take it with a pinch of
salt.
I’m not saying all the statements by the US are elaborate lies for it to pursue
its agenda, but some of them are exaggerated and far from the truth.
It is time for Malaysians not only to be politically mature, but also to use our
logic and common sense, especially in understanding a statement made against
Malaysia by a country that is willing to do anything as long as it fulfils its
agenda.
I believe that we have to trust our leaders, and even though some of us are
unable to do that, never trust foreign countries, especially those that have a
record of lying and media manipulation, even against their own people.

Ahmad Soffian,
Shah Alam,
Selangor